新的二手报告揭示了加密型气盘系统中的严重问题

Yerevan（coinchapter.com） - 一份新的binance报告揭示了加密空调系统中的严重问题。它突出了气流通常如何承诺公平的代币分布，但后来无法满足期望。

YEREVAN (CoinChapter.com) — Binance’s new report highlights serious issues in the crypto airdrop system. Often, airdrops promise fair token distribution but later fail to meet expectations.

Yerevan（coinchapter.com） - Binance的新报告突出了加密助气水系统中的严重问题。气流通常会承诺公平的代币分布，但后来无法满足期望。

According to Binance’s Grok AI sentiment tracker, late changes in plans drew 2/10. Early backlash followed news that Redstone (RED) planned to allocate 9.5% of its tokens to the community but later reduced it to 5% shortly before launch.

根据Binance的Grok AI情感跟踪器的说法，计划的较晚变化吸引了2/10。早期的反弹之后，有消息称，雷德斯通（Redstone）计划将其令牌的9.5％分配给社区，但后来将其降低到发布前不久的5％。

Moreover, Scroll’s October 2024 airdrop received a 3/10 rating. It used vague eligibility rules and lacked clear communication. Participants were confused about who qualified and how.

此外，Scroll于2024年10月的Airdrop获得了3/10的评级。它使用了模糊的资格规则，缺乏明确的沟通。参与者对谁的资格以及如何方式感到困惑。

The Binance report also notes issues with insider allocations. In February 2025, Kaito gave 43.3% of its token supply to insiders. Only 10% went to regular users. This imbalance, along with rapid sell-offs by influencers, led to dissatisfaction.

Binance报告还指出了内部分配的问题。 2025年2月，凯托（Kaito）向内部人士提供了43.3％的令牌供应。普通用户只有10％。这种失衡以及影响者的快速抛售导致了不满。

Sybil farming by bots, collecting tokens using multiple wallets to gain an unfair advantage, also contributed to fewer tokens being available for real users.

机器人的Sybil耕种，使用多个钱包收集代币以获得不公平的优势，这也导致了真正的用户可用的代币。

Magic Eden faced issues in December 2024 with its claim process failing during the airdrop. Many users couldn’t claim tokens due to technical problems, while bots exploited the situation.

魔术伊登（Magic Eden）在2024年12月面临问题，其索赔程序在空调期间失败。许多用户由于技术问题而无法要求代币，而机器人则利用了这种情况。

These cases show that failed airdrops are often linked to planning errors, lack of clarity in rules, and bot interference.

这些案例表明，失败的气流通常与计划错误，规则缺乏明确性和机器人干扰有关。

According to the Binance report, trust in crypto airdrops drops quickly after issues like these. Missed expectations and lack of transparency continue to affect public confidence.

根据Binance的报告，在此类问题之后，对加密驾驶汽车的信任很快下降。错过的期望和缺乏透明度继续影响公众的信心。

The report shows how late changes, such as Redstone’s reduced allocation, appear as poor planning. Scroll’s unclear eligibility is also a sign of missing communication.

该报告显示了变化的晚期，例如Redstone的分配减少，似乎是计划不良的计划。滚动的不清楚资格也是缺失通信的迹象。

Insider-heavy token distribution further separates regular users from key decision-making. Bots and technical problems make the process harder for communities that rely on fairness.

内部人员繁重的代币分布进一步将普通用户与关键决策分开。机器人和技术问题使依靠公平的社区更加困难。

In each example, the report links low satisfaction scores to these patterns: vague rules, technical problems, and unequal airdrop rewards.

在每个示例中，该报告都将低满意度得分与这些模式联系起来：模糊的规则，技术问题和不平等的空投奖励。

According to the report, Pudgy Penguins received a 10/10 score for following a clear plan and delivering consistent airdrop rewards.

根据该报告，矮胖的企鹅因遵循明确的计划并提供一致的气盘奖励而获得10/10分。

Hyperliquid also performed well, getting a 9/10 rating for delivering strong results in the DeFi space. Both cases showed clear token distribution, without major issues.

高流动性也表现良好，获得9/10的评分，以在Defi空间中提供强大的结果。这两个案例均显示出明确的令牌分布，没有重大问题。

These examples stand apart from failed airdrops. They had clear rules, no last-minute changes, and fewer complaints from the community.

这些示例与失败的气动台不同。他们有明确的规则，没有最后一刻的变化，社区的投诉较少。

The Binance report includes comments from its team to provide context.

Binance报告包括其团队提供上下文的评论。

“Tokens are a new asset class….Airdrops are their wild frontier.”

“代币是一种新的资产类别……。摩擦是他们的野生边界。”

This statement by Joshua Wong, a macro researcher, was included alongside the data to show how unpredictable the process remains. While some projects succeed, many fail due to missteps in planning, token distribution, and technical handling.

宏观研究人员约书亚·王（Joshua Wong）的这一说法与数据旁边包括在内，以显示该过程的不可预测性。尽管某些项目成功，但许多项目因计划，代币分销和技术处理而失败。

The report offers a detailed record of events. It tracks project performance based on community feedback and sentiment analysis. The issues it documents reflect how airdrops can affect overall trust in blockchain ecosystems.

该报告提供了事件的详细记录。它根据社区反馈和情感分析跟踪项目绩效。 IT记录的问题反映了气流如何影响区块链生态系统的整体信任。