新的二手報告揭示了加密型氣盤系統中的嚴重問題

Yerevan（coinchapter.com） - 一份新的binance報告揭示了加密空調系統中的嚴重問題。它突出了氣流通常如何承諾公平的代幣分佈，但後來無法滿足期望。

YEREVAN (CoinChapter.com) — Binance’s new report highlights serious issues in the crypto airdrop system. Often, airdrops promise fair token distribution but later fail to meet expectations.

Yerevan（coinchapter.com） - Binance的新報告突出了加密助氣水系統中的嚴重問題。氣流通常會承諾公平的代幣分佈，但後來無法滿足期望。

According to Binance’s Grok AI sentiment tracker, late changes in plans drew 2/10. Early backlash followed news that Redstone (RED) planned to allocate 9.5% of its tokens to the community but later reduced it to 5% shortly before launch.

根據Binance的Grok AI情感跟踪器的說法，計劃的較晚變化吸引了2/10。早期的反彈之後，有消息稱，雷德斯通（Redstone）計劃將其令牌的9.5％分配給社區，但後來將其降低到發布前不久的5％。

Moreover, Scroll’s October 2024 airdrop received a 3/10 rating. It used vague eligibility rules and lacked clear communication. Participants were confused about who qualified and how.

此外，Scroll於2024年10月的Airdrop獲得了3/10的評級。它使用了模糊的資格規則，缺乏明確的溝通。參與者對誰的資格以及如何方式感到困惑。

The Binance report also notes issues with insider allocations. In February 2025, Kaito gave 43.3% of its token supply to insiders. Only 10% went to regular users. This imbalance, along with rapid sell-offs by influencers, led to dissatisfaction.

Binance報告還指出了內部分配的問題。 2025年2月，凱托（Kaito）向內部人士提供了43.3％的令牌供應。普通用戶只有10％。這種失衡以及影響者的快速拋售導致了不滿。

Sybil farming by bots, collecting tokens using multiple wallets to gain an unfair advantage, also contributed to fewer tokens being available for real users.

機器人的Sybil耕種，使用多個錢包收集代幣以獲得不公平的優勢，這也導致了真正的用戶可用的代幣。

Magic Eden faced issues in December 2024 with its claim process failing during the airdrop. Many users couldn’t claim tokens due to technical problems, while bots exploited the situation.

魔術伊登（Magic Eden）在2024年12月面臨問題，其索賠程序在空調期間失敗。許多用戶由於技術問題而無法要求代幣，而機器人則利用了這種情況。

These cases show that failed airdrops are often linked to planning errors, lack of clarity in rules, and bot interference.

這些案例表明，失敗的氣流通常與計劃錯誤，規則缺乏明確性和機器人干擾有關。

According to the Binance report, trust in crypto airdrops drops quickly after issues like these. Missed expectations and lack of transparency continue to affect public confidence.

根據Binance的報告，在此類問題之後，對加密駕駛汽車的信任很快下降。錯過的期望和缺乏透明度繼續影響公眾的信心。

The report shows how late changes, such as Redstone’s reduced allocation, appear as poor planning. Scroll’s unclear eligibility is also a sign of missing communication.

該報告顯示了變化的晚期，例如Redstone的分配減少，似乎是計劃不良的計劃。滾動的不清楚資格也是缺失通信的跡象。

Insider-heavy token distribution further separates regular users from key decision-making. Bots and technical problems make the process harder for communities that rely on fairness.

內部人員繁重的代幣分佈進一步將普通用戶與關鍵決策分開。機器人和技術問題使依靠公平的社區更加困難。

In each example, the report links low satisfaction scores to these patterns: vague rules, technical problems, and unequal airdrop rewards.

在每個示例中，該報告都將低滿意度得分與這些模式聯繫起來：模糊的規則，技術問題和不平等的空投獎勵。

According to the report, Pudgy Penguins received a 10/10 score for following a clear plan and delivering consistent airdrop rewards.

根據該報告，矮胖的企鵝因遵循明確的計劃並提供一致的氣盤獎勵而獲得10/10分。

Hyperliquid also performed well, getting a 9/10 rating for delivering strong results in the DeFi space. Both cases showed clear token distribution, without major issues.

高流動性也表現良好，獲得9/10的評分，以在Defi空間中提供強大的結果。這兩個案例均顯示出明確的令牌分佈，沒有重大問題。

These examples stand apart from failed airdrops. They had clear rules, no last-minute changes, and fewer complaints from the community.

這些示例與失敗的氣動台不同。他們有明確的規則，沒有最後一刻的變化，社區的投訴較少。

The Binance report includes comments from its team to provide context.

Binance報告包括其團隊提供上下文的評論。

“Tokens are a new asset class….Airdrops are their wild frontier.”

“代幣是一種新的資產類別……。摩擦是他們的野生邊界。”

This statement by Joshua Wong, a macro researcher, was included alongside the data to show how unpredictable the process remains. While some projects succeed, many fail due to missteps in planning, token distribution, and technical handling.

宏觀研究人員約書亞·王（Joshua Wong）的這一說法與數據旁邊包括在內，以顯示該過程的不可預測性。儘管某些項目成功，但許多項目因計劃，代幣分銷和技術處理而失敗。

The report offers a detailed record of events. It tracks project performance based on community feedback and sentiment analysis. The issues it documents reflect how airdrops can affect overall trust in blockchain ecosystems.

該報告提供了事件的詳細記錄。它根據社區反饋和情感分析跟踪項目績效。 IT記錄的問題反映了氣流如何影響區塊鏈生態系統的整體信任。