這就是為什麼$ xrp不能便宜的$ 10,000即將迫在眉睫🤝

戴維·施瓦茨（David Schwartz）解釋說，XRP價格較高，需要更少的XRP來移動相同的交易金額。對於10億美元的轉移，適用以下條件：

Brett (@Brett_Crypto_X), a popular cryptocurrency expert on X, highlighted past remarks by Ripple CTO David Schwartz to explain why the XRP token must rise in price to fulfill its intended utility at scale.

Brett（@BRETT_CRYPTO_X）是X上受歡迎的加密貨幣專家，他強調了Ripple CTO CTO David Schwartz的過去言論，以解釋為什麼XRP代幣必須上漲以實現其規模的預期實用程序。

While discussing the ability of XRP to facilitate large-scale value transfers, Schwartz explained that a higher XRP price would mean less XRP is needed to move the same transaction amount. For the transfer of 1 billion US dollars, the following applies:

在討論XRP促進大規模價值轉移的能力時，Schwartz解釋說，較高的XRP價格意味著移動相同交易量所需的XRP較少。對於10億美元的轉移，適用以下條件：

* If XRP cost $1, they’d need a million XRP, which would cost $1 million.

*如果XRP的價格為1美元，他們需要一百萬XRP，這將花費100萬美元。

* If XRP cost $1,000, they’d need 1,000 XRP, which would, again, be $1 million.

*如果XRP的價格為1,000美元，他們需要1,000 XRP，這再次是100萬美元。

* If XRP cost $10,000, they’d need one XRP, which would, again, be $1 million.

*如果XRP售價10,000美元，他們需要一個XRP，這再次是100萬美元。

This logic is often used to argue that the price per XRP must increase to efficiently facilitate high-value transactions, especially those involving institutional-scale cross-border payments. A recent Coinbase report highlighted that XRP is appealing to institutions, and as adoption rises, the asset’s price will have to follow to ensure it can handle the required volume.

這種邏輯通常用於爭辯說，每XRP的價格必須上漲以有效促進高價值交易，尤其是涉及機構規模的跨境支付的交易。最近的一份Coinbase報告強調，XRP吸引了機構，隨著採用的上漲，資產的價格必須遵循，以確保其可以處理所需的數量。

Schwartz further explained how market dynamics support this pricing logic. He stated that higher prices make payments cheaper, using Bitcoin's price evolution as an example. When Bitcoin was priced at $300, attempting to buy a million-dollar house would require the movement of a large number of tokens, which would move the market too much and be too expensive. At higher prices, fewer tokens are needed, reducing market slippage and making transactions more manageable.

Schwartz進一步解釋了市場動態如何支持這種定價邏輯。他說，以比特幣的價格演變為例，更高的價格使付款更便宜。當比特幣的價格為300美元時，試圖購買一百萬美元的房屋將需要大量代幣的移動，這將使市場過多，而且太貴了。以更高的價格，需要更少的令牌，減少市場滑倒並使交易更易於管理。

In another tweet, Schwartz clarified how XRP transactions with institutions are handled. He explained that institutional sales of XRP are handled on a case-by-case basis and typically come with lockups, meaning they do not directly affect the public market.

在另一條推文中，Schwartz闡明瞭如何處理機構的XRP交易。他解釋說，XRP的機構銷售是根據具體情況處理的，通常會鎖定，這意味著它們不會直接影響公共市場。

With institutions showing interest in XRP, this distinction adds to the asset’s appeal. The broader implication of these arguments is that XRP’s price must be sufficiently high to support its utility as a bridge asset for large-scale transfers. As the token is used to facilitate liquidity between fiat pairs, a low price would require an excessive volume to settle large sums, creating practical limitations on the asset’s utility.

隨著機構對XRP的興趣，這種區別增加了資產的上訴。這些論點的廣泛含義是，XRP的價格必須足夠高，以支持其作為大規模轉移的橋樑資產的效用。由於代幣用於促進菲亞特對之間的流動性，因此低價將需要大量的數量來解決大筆款項，從而對資產的實用程序產生實際限制。

While XRP has faced setbacks recently, the logic presented by Schwartz continues to be a factor in investor expectations. The premise is straightforward: if XRP is to be used to settle transfers of billions of dollars, the token’s price must be high enough to make it possible without disrupting markets.

儘管XRP最近面臨挫折，但Schwartz提出的邏輯仍然是投資者期望的一個因素。前提很簡單：如果要使用XRP來解決數十億美元的轉移，則令牌的價格必須足夠高，以使其成為可能，而不會破壞市場。