本週，Coingeek的首席比特幣歷史學家Kurt Wuckert Jr.加入了顛覆性頻譜播客來談論隱私，需要擴展比特幣

作為對人類自由的倡導者和倡導者，艾滋病派及其聯合主持人薩爾（Sal）對為什麼Wuckert不再更多地參與像Monero這樣的隱私硬幣。

In this week’s episode of The Subversive Spectrum podcast, CoinGeek’s Chief Bitcoin Historian, Kurt Wuckert Jr., joined Sal the Agorist and his co-host to discuss privacy, the need to scale Bitcoin, how little ‘crypto’ has actually achieved, and much more.

在本週的《顛覆性頻譜播客》中，Coingeek的首席比特幣歷史學家小庫爾特·沃克特（Kurt Wuckert Jr.

As Agorists and advocates for human liberty, Sal the Agorist and his co-host are interested in why Wuckert isn’t more involved in a privacy coin like Monero.

作為對人類自由的倡導者和倡導者，艾滋病派及其聯合主持人薩爾（Sal）對為什麼Wuckert不再更多地參與像Monero這樣的隱私硬幣。

“16 proofs is great, but it’s still only 16,” Wuckert says. Monero isn’t as private as some people think, and while there’s lots of marketing around privacy tech in general, there are always vulnerabilities.

“ 16個證明很棒，但仍然只有16個，” Wuckert說。蒙羅（Monero）並不像某些人想像的那樣私密，儘管一般而言，圍繞隱私技術的營銷有很多營銷，但總會有脆弱性。

Instead of relying on flawed technology, Wuckert favors massive scalability and huge transaction volumes. BSV allows people to construct lots of unique transaction types, even using tech like ring signatures, but the real secret to privacy lies in billions of on-chain transactions and how they make it impossible for law enforcement in authoritarian states to track and trace people. With so many transactions to sift through, police are forced to focus on hardened criminals and serious crimes.

Wuckert不依賴有缺陷的技術，而是偏愛巨大的可擴展性和巨大的交易量。 BSV允許人們構建許多獨特的交易類型，即使使用諸如環形簽名之類的技術，但隱私的真正秘訣在於數十億美元的鏈接交易，以及他們如何使專制國家執法部門無法追踪和追踪人員。通過如此多的交易進行篩選，警察被迫專注於頑固的罪犯和嚴重的犯罪。

Recently, Wuckert wrote an article on CoinGeek titled ‘Economic slowdown is here—Bitcoin’s utility is even more crucial.’ In it, he explores the recent market pullbacks, how HODLing is not good for the economy, and why Bitcoin can be better used to create more efficient markets. Sal the Agorist asks him to expand on the thinking in this article.

最近，Wuckert寫了一篇關於Coingeek的文章，標題為“經濟放緩在這裡 - Bitcoin的效用更為重要”。在其中，他探討了最近的市場回調，霍德林對經濟不利，以及為什麼可以更好地使用比特幣來創造更有效的市場。艾滋病主義者薩爾（Sal）要求他對本文的思想進行擴展。

Wuckert explains that Donald Trump, Howard Lutnick, and others in the administration aren’t ‘crypto guys’ but bankers who have figured out how to make a buck in the industry. Marketing BTC as a store of value was a solution to the fact it doesn’t scale, and now it seems the U.S. government will be the “bagholder of last resort.”

Wuckert解釋說，唐納德·特朗普（Donald Trump），霍華德·盧特尼克（Howard Lutnick）和政府中的其他人不是“加密貨幣人物”，而是弄清楚如何在行業中賺錢的銀行家。營銷BTC作為價值存儲是一種解決事實的解決方案，現在似乎美國政府將成為“ Last Resort的行李箱”。

After discussing the Agorist principles of self-ownership and how they relate to crypto, Sal the Agorist asks why, given that BSV and Monero are both widely delisted on exchanges, Wuckert doesn’t go for Bitcoin Cash.

在討論了自我所有權的代表原則及其與加密貨幣之間的關係之後，艾滋病主義者問為什麼，鑑於BSV和Monero都在交流中廣泛偏愛，因此Wuckert不購買比特幣現金。

Wuckert says he agrees with the “pamphlet version” of BCH, but the technical reality is quite different. Fundamentally, it just can’t scale enough to act as the replacement for fiat currency.

Wuckert說他同意BCH的“小冊子版本”，但技術現實卻大不相同。從根本上講，它的擴展不足以作為菲亞特貨幣的替代。

It has taken a decade and tens of millions to scale BSV to one million transactions per second, with a team of experts focused on that goal. It would take just as long and cost just as much for the BCH camp to catch up, by which time BSV will be even further ahead.

將BSV擴展到每秒100萬筆交易已經花了十年和數千萬，一組專家集中在這一目標上。 BCH營地趕上這將需要盡可能長的時間，而BSV將更遠。

If Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) or Walmart (NASDAQ:WMT) were to embrace Bitcoin tomorrow, only BSV could deliver the required transaction throughput.

如果亞馬遜（NASDAQ：AMZN）或沃爾瑪（NASDAQ：WMT）明天要接受比特幣，則只有BSV才能提供所需的交易吞吐量。

Wuckert says he finds the Trump administration highly entertaining, aside from the tariffs and trade wars, which are objectively bad. He thinks everyone at the summit was a clown or a crook, labeling the entire thing a “clown show.”

瓦克特說，除了客觀上糟糕的關稅和貿易戰爭外，他發現特朗普政府非常娛樂。他認為山頂上的每個人都是小丑或騙子，將整個東西都標記為“小丑表演”。

As for the strategic crypto reserve, which includes assets like XRP, SOL, and ADA, Wuckert is against it. There’s no reason to stockpile assets that have no utility; using either seized funds or taxpayer money to do it is insulting. There’s a justification to have strategic stockpiles of oil, gold, or ammo in case of war, but not for these totally useless assets.

至於包括XRP，SOL和ADA等資產的戰略加密保護區，Wuckert反對它。沒有理由儲存沒有公用事業的資產。使用扣押的資金或納稅人的錢來做到這一點。有一個理由是在戰爭中擁有戰略性的石油，黃金或彈藥，但沒有這些完全無用的資產。

To hear more about data sovereignty, efficient payments, and why the blockchain industry has achieved so little despite so much investment in the past decade, watch the replay of the podcast here.

要了解有關數據主權，高效付款的更多信息，以及為什麼在過去的十年中投資太多，區塊鏈行業的成就很少，請在此處觀看播客的重播。