龍捲風現金發布：加密攪拌機的潮流是潮流嗎？

並非每天都有一種匿名工具，即與北朝鮮黑客（臭名昭著的拉撒路集團，負責Bybit Hack）的同謀

For a time, Tornado Cash was the ugly duckling of the blockchain. Accused of obscuring the trail of several billion dollars in dubious funds, the famous crypto mixer found itself on the U.S. Treasury’s blacklist. But surprise on March 21: the guillotine fell… the other way around. The United States government has simply lifted the sanctions against this protocol. A twist of fate? Maybe. A sign of change? Definitely.

一段時間以來，龍捲風現金一直是區塊鏈的醜陋小鴨。這位著名的加密混音器被指控掩蓋了數十億美元的可疑資金，因此在美國財政部的黑名單上發現了自己。但是3月21日驚喜：斷頭台倒下了……相反。美國政府只是取消了針對該協議的製裁。命運的轉折？或許。變化的跡象？確實。

Tornado Cash released: is the tide turning for crypto mixers?

龍捲風現金發布：加密攪拌機的潮流是潮流嗎？

It’s not every day that an anonymization tool, deemed complicit with North Korean hackers (the infamous Lazarus Group, responsible for the Bybit hack), is cleared of all suspicion… or almost. The affair dates back to 2022 when Tornado Cash was accused of helping to make over 7 billion dollars disappear. Just that. Authorities hit hard, blocking access and freezing connections with U.S. players.

並非每天都有一種匿名工具被認為與朝鮮黑客（臭名昭著的Lazarus集團，負責Bybit Hack）的同謀被清除了所有懷疑……或者幾乎幾乎。這項事件的歷史可以追溯到2022年，當時龍捲風現金被指控幫助使超過70億美元消失。就是這樣。當局猛烈打擊，阻止訪問權限並與美國玩家凍結聯繫。

But here’s the thing: a tiny grain of sand came to jam the judicial machine. Last November, an appeals court ruled that Tornado Cash’s smart contracts were neither people nor properties. Translation: you cannot sanction code as if it were a legal entity. A real case study for lawyers and a relief for advocates of free code.

但這是事實：一小撮沙塞在司法機器上。去年11月，上訴法院裁定，龍捲風現金的智能合約既不是人，也不是財產。翻譯：您不能製裁代碼，就好像它是法人實體一樣。律師的真實案例研究，並為自由代碼的擁護者提供救濟。

Decentralization vs regulation: does freedom have its limits?

權力下放與法規：自由有限制嗎？

So, what does this turnaround mean for the crypto world? First, it proves that decentralization seriously complicates the regulators’ task. It is impossible to muzzle open code like you would fine a Wall Street crook. Next, it raises a serious question: how far can we go to protect privacy without opening the door to abuses?

那麼，這種周轉對加密世界意味著什麼？首先，它證明權力下放會嚴重複雜監管機構的任務。不可能像您罰款華爾街騙子一樣開放代碼。接下來，它提出了一個嚴重的問題：我們可以在不打開虐待之門的情況下要多遠保護隱私？

The Treasury, for its part, is not letting its guard down. It continues to monitor North Korean cybercriminals and reminds that vigilance is still necessary. The message is clear: “OK for anonymity, but not for impunity.”

財政部並沒有讓它的警衛失望。它繼續監視朝鮮的網絡犯罪分子，並提醒仍然需要警惕。消息很明確：“可以匿名，但不罰。”

As the SEC has just cleared up a legal gray area around PoW mining, it is now Tornado Cash’s turn to be freed. If the code is free, its uses are not always so. At a time when crypto regulation is still feeling its way, this case reminds us that innovation often moves faster than the law… and that the discussion is just beginning.

由於SEC剛剛清理了Pow Mining周圍的合法灰色區域，現在輪到龍捲風了。如果代碼是免費的，則並非總是如此。在加密監管仍在感覺方面的時候，此案提醒我們，創新通常比法律更快……而討論才剛剛開始。