市值: $2.6133T -4.120%
體積(24小時): $136.1508B 77.830%
  • 市值: $2.6133T -4.120%
  • 體積(24小時): $136.1508B 77.830%
  • 恐懼與貪婪指數:
  • 市值: $2.6133T -4.120%
加密
主題
加密植物
資訊
加密術
影片
頭號新聞
加密
主題
加密植物
資訊
加密術
影片
bitcoin
bitcoin

$83571.608249 USD

-1.38%

ethereum
ethereum

$1826.028236 USD

-3.02%

tether
tether

$0.999839 USD

-0.01%

xrp
xrp

$2.053149 USD

-2.48%

bnb
bnb

$601.140115 USD

-0.44%

solana
solana

$120.357332 USD

-3.79%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999833 USD

-0.02%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.166175 USD

-3.43%

cardano
cardano

$0.652521 USD

-3.00%

tron
tron

$0.236809 USD

-0.59%

toncoin
toncoin

$3.785339 USD

-5.02%

chainlink
chainlink

$13.253231 USD

-3.91%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.397427 USD

-0.19%

stellar
stellar

$0.266444 USD

-1.00%

sui
sui

$2.409007 USD

1.15%

加密貨幣新聞文章

Techteryx是Tureusd背後的公司,要求賈斯汀·孫(Justin Sun

2025/04/03 01:21

香港的法庭文件和Coindesk的報導透露,Tureusd背後的公司Techteryx要求賈斯汀·孫(Justin Sun)儲備在第一個數字信託中陷入困境,並有效地破產了。

Techteryx是Tureusd背後的公司,要求賈斯汀·孫(Justin Sun

Techteryx, the firm behind TrueUSD, required a loan from Justin Sun after its reserves became stuck in First Digital Trust and it became effectively insolvent, unable to redeem its tokens, local reports from Hong Kong and coverage by CoinDesk have revealed.

Techteryx是Tureusd背後的公司,要求賈斯汀·孫(Justin Sun)儲備在第一座數字信託基金中,並有效地破產,無法贖回其代幣。

This runs contrary to certain public claims by TrueUSD that during the period in question, it continued to claim that it was backed “1:1” by US dollars — even after it started having redemption issues with First Digital.

這與Trueusd的某些公眾主張相反,即在有關期間,它繼續聲稱它是通過美元支持“ 1:1”的 - 即使它開始使用第一個數字兌換問題。

These claims relate to TrueUSD’s relationship with First Digital Trust, which was its primary asset manager.

這些主張與Trueusd與首先是其主要資產經理的Digital Trust的關係有關。

TrueUSD trusted First Digital to manage its reserve, and First Digital Trust invested in trade finance on its behalf. TrueUSD has since alleged that it was unable to redeem those funds and that First Digital directed some assets to another firm, “Glass Door,” apparently without permission from Techteryx.

TrueUsd信任第一數字來管理其儲備金,並代表其對貿易融資進行了投資。此後,Trueusd聲稱它無法兌換這些資金,並且首先未經Techteryx允許將某些資產引向另一家公司“ Glass Door”。

SEC case

SEC案

This insolvency was also at the center of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) case against TrueUSD, which clearly alleged that TrueUSD misrepresented its “1:1” backing.

這種破產也是針對Tureusd的證券交易委員會(SEC)案的中心,該案件清楚地聲稱Tureusd歪曲了其“ 1:1”的支持。

TrueUSD agreed to settle this case, and in its current Hong Kong case, it notes that it “did not dispute the complaint.”

Trueusd同意解決此案,並在目前的香港案中指出,它“沒有對投訴提出異議”。

The SEC case also revealed publicly that TrueUSD’s problems were related to First Digital Trust and that the fund that First Digital marketed to TrueUSD was described in other documents as only suitable for those who could “bear the risk of losing most or all of their investment.”

SEC案子還公開透露,Trueusd的問題與第一個數字信託有關,並且在其他文檔中將第一個數字銷售的基金描述為僅適用於那些可能“承擔損失大部分或全部投資的風險”的人。

Read more: What’s up with TrueUSD and the rest of TrustToken’s stablecoins?

閱讀更多:Trueusd和Trusttoken的其他穩定者怎麼了?

Strangely, even after this settlement, a close review of TrueUSD’s attestations seems to suggest that TrueUSD remained invested in First Digital, likely related to the fact that it was unable to redeem these funds.

奇怪的是,即使在達成和解之後,對Trueusd的證明的仔細審查似乎表明Trueusd仍然投資於第一個數字,這可能與無法兌換這些資金的事實有關。

Even in today’s attestation, prepared by Moore Hong Kong, it is revealed that nearly all of the reserves, worth over $500 million, are still held at First Digital. The accounting firm further notes that those portions of the reserves are “reported at cost,” and that its “procedures do not include an examination over the fair market value of the investments.”

即使在今天由摩爾香港編寫的證明中,也據透露,幾乎所有價值超過5億美元的儲備仍然在首先數字上持有。這家會計師事務所進一步指出,這些儲量的這些部分是“以成本報告的”,並且“程序不包括對投資的公平市場價值進行檢查”。

Even management’s notes to the report signed by Jennifer Jiang show that the assets that First Digital invested in are not “readily convertible to cash.” They also note that “Techteryx has already engaged alternative liquidity, separate from the reserves of USD denominated collateral.”

即使管理層在詹妮弗·江(Jennifer Jiang)簽署的報告中的註釋也表明,首次投資的資產並不是“容易轉換為現金”。他們還指出:“ Techteryx已經參與了替代流動性,與美元的抵押品的儲備區分開。”

However, notably, the website homepage no longer claims “1:1” backing.

但是,尤其是該網站主頁不再聲稱“ 1:1”支持。

Hong Kong case

香港案

The Hong Kong suit echoes the need for alternative liquidity, noting that it “has engaged liquidity solutions to reinforce the integrity of the TUSD stablecoin.”

香港訴訟呼應了對替代流動性的需求,並指出它“聘用了加強TUSD Stablecoin完整性的流動性解決方案”。

CoinDesk’s reporting suggests that this liquidity came from Sun and was structured as a loan.

Coindesk的報告表明,這種流動性來自太陽,並作為貸款結構構成。

This liquidity was necessary because First Digital would not or could not service the redemptions that TrueUSD requested, and the total damage from this is the entire value still invested with First Digital.

這種流動性是必要的,因為首先數字將無法或無法為Tureusd要求的贖回服務,而這是該贖回的總損失,這是仍然用第一個數字投資的全部價值。

Read more: TrueUSD was hacked and issued fake tokens

閱讀更多:Trueusd被黑客入侵並發出了假令牌

The lawsuit also claims that “secret payments” were transferred to bank accounts in the name of Legacy Trust, another trust firm run by Chok that previously worked with TrueUSD and has a close relationship with First Digital Trust.

該訴訟還聲稱,“秘密付款”是以Chok經營的另一家信託公司的名義轉移到銀行帳戶的,該公司以前曾與Tureusd合作,並與First Digital Trust有著密切的關係。

TrueUSD alleges that these payments were an “illicit kick-back” and claims that it only became aware of them last month.

Trueusd聲稱這些付款是“非法的踢腳”,並聲稱上個月才意識到它們。

It also makes a more exceptional claim, specifically that Chok claimed that First Digital Trust “was raising funds from other customers and would repay the plaintiff with such funds.” This is behavior that TrueUSD alleges is “akin to a ‘Ponzi’ scheme.”

這也提出了一個更加異常的主張,特別是Chok聲稱第一筆數字信託“正在從其他客戶那裡籌集資金,並將通過此類資金償還原告”。這是Trueusd聲稱的行為“類似於“龐氏案”計劃。

Justin Sun’s role

賈斯汀·孫的角色

Justin Sun has claimed that he does not own Techteryx or TrueUSD but has been identified as an “Asia Market Advisor” to TrueUSD.

賈斯汀·孫(Justin Sun)聲稱,他不擁有Techteryx或Trueusd,而是被確定為Tureusd的“亞洲市場顧問”。

He has also previously admitted that he is a “partner market maker” for TrueUSD

他以前還承認,他是Tureusd的“合作夥伴做市商”

This is important because Techteryx has claimed publicly that TrueUSD was not owned by Justin Sun.

這很重要,因為Techteryx已公開聲稱Trueusd並非由Justin Sun擁有。

Read more: TrueUSD bank FlowBank forced into bankruptcy

閱讀更多:Tureusd Bank Flowbank被迫破產

However, this has been previously cast into doubt by a pro se lawsuit filed by the former TrustLabs Chief Executive, Daniel Jaiyong An, who claimed that Sun, with the assistance of Can Sun, tried to acquire TrueUSD.

但是,此前,這位前TrustLabs首席執行官Daniel Jaiyong An提起的一項職業訴訟以前對此表示懷疑,後者聲稱Sun在Can Sun的協助下試圖收購Trueusd。

This new loan from Sun to Techteryx suggests that Sun may have more entwined business relationships with Techteryx than previously disclosed.

從Sun到Techteryx的這筆新貸款表明,Sun可能與Techteryx具有比以前披露的更多的糾纏業務關係。

Currently, 80% of TUSD tokens on Ethereum are held in three addresses that received all their TUSD from Sun-advised HTX.

目前,以太坊上有80%的TUSD令牌在三個地址中持有,這些地址從Sun Audvised HTX獲得了所有TUSD。

On Tron, nearly 90% of TUSD tokens are held in two addresses that received all their TUSD from Sun-advised HTX.

在Tron上,將近90%的TUSD令牌持有兩個地址,這些地址從Sun Audvised HTX中獲得了所有TUSD。

TrueUSD and First Digital did not respond to a request for comment before publication.

Trueusd和First Digital在發布之前沒有回應置評請求。

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or

有小費嗎?通過Protos洩漏向我們發送電子郵件。有關更多知情的新聞,請關注我們X,Bluesky和Google新聞,或

免責聲明:info@kdj.com

所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!

如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。

2025年04月03日 其他文章發表於