隨著新主題加密貨幣代幣的出現，《魷魚遊戲》第二季的發布重新引發了詐騙擔憂

12 月26 日，《魷魚遊戲》第二季在Netflix（納斯達克股票代碼：NFLX）上映，重新點燃了人們對這部熱門韓劇的迷戀，導致了多種新的《魷魚遊戲》主題的加密貨幣代幣的出現。

The release of Squid Game Season 2 on Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX) on December 26 has led to the emergence of several new Squid Game-themed cryptocurrency tokens.

12 月 26 日，《Squid Game》第二季在 Netflix（納斯達克股票代碼：NFLX）發布，引發了多種新的 Squid Game 主題加密貨幣代幣的出現。

Among the numerous tokens, Squid Game (squidgame.top) SQUID stands out with massive gains.

在眾多代幣中，魷魚遊戲（squidgame.top）SQUID以巨大漲幅脫穎而出。

The token has rallied over 6,700% in the past week, trading at $0.0001203 after a 300% surge in the last 24 hours, according to data retrieved by Finbold from CoinMarketCap on December 30.

根據 Finbold 12 月 30 日從 CoinMarketCap 檢索到的數據，在過去 24 小時內飆升 300% 後，該代幣在過去一周上漲了 6,700% 以上，交易價格為 0.0001203 美元。

It’s worth noting that SQUID is part of a wave of tokens aiming to profit from popular cultural phenomena despite its questionable history.

值得注意的是，SQUID 是一波旨在從流行文化現像中獲利的代幣浪潮的一部分，儘管其歷史值得懷疑。

The Squid Game tokens first gained popularity in 2021 during the show’s initial season, with some witnessing a massive price surge before plummeting in what was identified as a ‘rug pull’ scam.

Squid Game 代幣於 2021 年該劇第一季首次受到歡迎，一些人見證了代幣價格大幅飆升，然後在被認為是「拉扯」騙局的情況下暴跌。

For one token, developers abruptly abandoned the project, leaving investors with losses as the token’s value dropped to nearly zero within minutes.

對於一種代幣，開發人員突然放棄了該項目，導致投資者蒙受損失，因為該代幣的價值在幾分鐘內幾乎跌至零。

Following this collapse, Binance investigated the 2021 SQUID token crash, labeling it a likely scam. The exchange noted that projects tied to high-profile pop culture phenomena often exploit the resulting hype to lure unsuspecting buyers into risky or fraudulent schemes.

這次崩潰之後，幣安對 2021 年 SQUID 代幣崩潰進行了調查，並將其標記為可能的騙局。該交易所指出，與引人注目的流行文化現象相關的項目經常利用由此產生的炒作來引誘毫無戒心的買家參與危險或欺詐性的計劃。

Meanwhile, analyzing the token by the cryptocurrency scam detection platform Token Sniffer indicates that the token shows signs of a potential scam.

同時，透過加密貨幣詐騙檢測平台 Token Sniffer 對代幣進行分析表明，該代幣顯示出潛在詐騙的跡象。

SQUID’s market capitalization is estimated at $5.57 million, but CoinMarketCap stressed that this figure is unverifiable, raising transparency concerns. Credibility remains uncertain with a 24-hour trading volume of $2.6 million and a self-reported circulating supply of 45.6 billion—equal to its maximum supply.

SQUID 的市值估計為 557 萬美元，但 CoinMarketCap 強調這一數字無法核實，引發了透明度擔憂。 24 小時交易量為 260 萬美元，自我報告的流通供應量為 456 億，等於其最大供應量，可信度仍不確定。

To this end, blockchain security firm PeckShield has flagged multiple Squid Game-themed tokens as fraudulent.

為此，區塊鏈安全公司 PeckShield 已將多個 Squid Game 主題代幣標記為詐欺代幣。

In one case, the entity noted that a token on the Base network experienced a 99% value collapse shortly after launch, with its creator holding the majority of the supply in what appeared to be a coordinated dump.

在一個案例中，該實體指出，Base 網路上的一種代幣在發布後不久就經歷了 99% 的價值暴跌，其創建者在似乎是協調轉儲的地方持有大部分供應。

#PeckShieldAlert Beware of scam #SquidGame tokens circulating in the wild. We have detected a fraudulent #SquidGame token deployed on #Base just 3 hours ago, with the deployer as the largest holder. The token has dropped 99%. pic.twitter.com/EIdaUldzaF

#PeckShieldAlert 謹防在野外流通的騙局#SquidGame 代幣。我們偵測到 3 小時前部署在 #Base 上的詐騙 #SquidGame 代幣，部署者是最大的持有者。代幣已下跌 99%。 pic.twitter.com/EIdaUldzaF

Moreover, a review of CoinMarketCap revealed multiple SQUID token variations with distinct market capitalizations, raising concerns about potential scams. The presence of similar tokens can confuse investors and hint at attempts by bad actors to exploit the token’s popularity through fraudulent schemes.

此外，對 CoinMarketCap 的審查揭示了多種具有不同市值的 SQUID 代幣變體，引發了對潛在詐騙的擔憂。類似代幣的存在可能會讓投資者感到困惑，並暗示不良行為者試圖透過詐欺計畫來利用代幣的受歡迎程度。

Similar concerns have emerged on the Solana (SOL) network, where several wallets holding large portions of the supply appear to be linked, suggesting manipulation and potential exploitation of unsuspecting investors.

Solana (SOL) 網路上也出現了類似的擔憂，其中持有大部分供應量的幾個錢包似乎是相互關聯的，這表明毫無戒心的投資者存在操縱行為和潛在的剝削行為。

While SQUID’s price surge may tempt speculative traders, its controversial history and the lingering red flags, such as the lack of underlying use cases, point to substantial risks.

雖然 SQUID 的價格飆升可能會吸引投機交易者，但其有爭議的歷史和揮之不去的危險信號（例如缺乏基礎用例）表明存在巨大風險。