紋波VS。 SEC：傑里米·霍根 (Jeremy Hogan) 批評 SEC 的 20 億美元索賠

法律專家 Jeremy Hogan 批評 SEC 對 Ripple 提出的 20 億美元索賠，質疑其公平性。他認為，巨額罰款可能會損害散戶投資者，破壞該機構保護他們的使命。霍根的擔憂引發了人們對美國證券交易委員會優先事項的懷疑，這表明機構投資者可能會以犧牲個人利益為代價而受益。

SEC's Heavy-Handed Tactics: Ripple and Retail Investors Bear the Brunt

美國證券交易委員會的高壓手段：瑞波幣和散戶投資者首當其衝

Is the SEC's $2 Billion Fine of Ripple Fair Play?

SEC 對 Ripple 開出 20 億美元罰款是否公平？

Legal eagle Jeremy Hogan has slammed the SEC's hefty fine of $2 billion on Ripple Labs, questioning its alignment with the agency's mission of protecting investors. Hogan argues that such a penalty would force Ripple to unload a significant chunk of XRP, potentially crushing retail holders' investments.

法律鷹傑里米·霍根 (Jeremy Hogan) 猛烈抨擊了 SEC 對 Ripple Labs 的 20 億美元巨額罰款，並質疑其是否符合該機構保護投資者的使命。霍根認為，這樣的懲罰將迫使 Ripple 拋售大量 XRP，可能會壓垮散戶持有者的投資。

Does the SEC Value Institutional Investors Over Retail?

SEC 更重視機構投資人而非散戶？

Hogan's criticism highlights the SEC's questionable attitude towards Ripple, which appears to harm retail investors, the very people it's supposed to safeguard. The proposed redistribution of the fine raises concerns that institutional holders could benefit at the expense of individual investors, casting doubt on the SEC's effectiveness in protecting the general investor population.

霍根的批評凸顯了 SEC 對 Ripple 的可疑態度，這似乎傷害了散戶投資者，而這些投資者正是 SEC 應該保護的人。擬議的罰款重新分配引發了人們的擔憂，即機構持有人可能會以犧牲個人投資者的利益為代價而受益，這使人們對美國證券交易委員會在保護普通投資者群體方面的有效性產生懷疑。

SEC's Enforcement Dampens Ripple Token Value

SEC 的執法削弱了 Ripple 代幣價值

The SEC's allegations against Ripple Labs, accusing it of harming investors and market stability, have triggered a hefty penalty package. Critics like Hogan argue that imposing traditional regulations on cryptocurrencies, like XRP, could have unintended consequences. Ripple's forced sale of XRP to cover the fine would likely depress its value, potentially harming the investors the SEC aims to protect.

美國證券交易委員會對 Ripple Labs 的指控，指控其損害投資者和市場穩定，並引發了巨額處罰。霍根等批評者認為，對 XRP 等加密貨幣實施傳統監管可能會產生意想不到的後果。 Ripple 強制出售 XRP 以支付罰款可能會壓低其價值，這可能會損害 SEC 旨在保護的投資者。

Is the SEC's Outdated Regulation Stifling Crypto Innovation?

美國證券交易委員會過時的監管是否會扼殺加密貨幣創新？

Ripple advocate and Senate candidate John Deaton has joined the chorus of voices criticizing the SEC's regulatory approach. Deaton points to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and its focus on investor safeguards in the aftermath of the 1929 crash. While acknowledging the SEC's historical mission, Deaton contends that it needs to embrace technological advancements like blockchain and cryptocurrencies.

Ripple 倡導者、參議院候選人 John Deaton 也加入了批評 SEC 監管方式的行列。迪頓指出 1934 年的《證券交易法》及其對 1929 年股市崩盤後投資人保障的關注。在承認 SEC 的歷史使命的同時，迪頓認為它需要擁抱區塊鏈和加密貨幣等技術進步。

Time for a Regulatory Revamp: Deaton Calls on SEC to Modernize

是時候進行監管改革了：迪頓呼籲 SEC 現代化

Deaton's call for a regulatory overhaul reflects the growing frustration with the SEC's application of outdated laws to digital assets. He emphasizes that with a significant portion of Americans now owning cryptocurrencies, the agency must evolve its strategies to address the realities of today's market. His demand for SEC Chairman Gary Gensler's resignation underscores the urgency for a regulatory framework that fosters innovation in the cryptocurrency space.

迪頓呼籲進行監管改革，反映出人們對 SEC 對數位資產適用過時法律的日益不滿。他強調，由於很大一部分美國人現在擁有加密貨幣，該機構必須制定策略以應對當今市場的現實。他要求 SEC 主席加里·詹斯勒 (Gary Gensler) 辭職，這凸顯了建立促進加密貨幣領域創新的監管框架的緊迫性。