市值: $2.8414T -0.410%
體積(24小時): $56.2017B -56.090%
  • 市值: $2.8414T -0.410%
  • 體積(24小時): $56.2017B -56.090%
  • 恐懼與貪婪指數:
  • 市值: $2.8414T -0.410%
Cryptos
主題
Cryptospedia
資訊
CryptosTopics
影片
Top News
Cryptos
主題
Cryptospedia
資訊
CryptosTopics
影片
bitcoin
bitcoin

$86016.827096 USD

-3.42%

ethereum
ethereum

$2129.471540 USD

-3.13%

tether
tether

$0.999844 USD

-0.03%

xrp
xrp

$2.328702 USD

-8.44%

bnb
bnb

$595.845758 USD

-0.82%

solana
solana

$137.920269 USD

-4.71%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999995 USD

-0.01%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.194781 USD

-3.73%

cardano
cardano

$0.809126 USD

-8.20%

tron
tron

$0.250091 USD

3.31%

pi
pi

$1.801049 USD

0.03%

chainlink
chainlink

$15.303441 USD

-10.54%

hedera
hedera

$0.227466 USD

-10.38%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.837554 USD

-0.88%

stellar
stellar

$0.276271 USD

-8.05%

加密貨幣新聞文章

Ripple 和 Coinbase 案件交织在一起,塑造了加密货币监管格局

2024/04/20 12:02

Ripple 和 Coinbase 案件交织在一起,塑造了加密货币监管格局

The Ripple and Coinbase Cases: Unraveling the Regulatory Landscape for Cryptocurrencies

In a significant legal development, attorney John E Deaton, who represents XRP holders in the SEC vs. Ripple case, has sought permission to represent over 4,700 Coinbase customers in the ongoing SEC vs. Coinbase litigation. This move underscores the interconnectedness of these two high-profile cases and highlights the broader implications for the regulatory future of cryptocurrencies in the United States.

Coinbase's Interlocutory Appeal: Challenging the SEC's Stance

The SEC's recent victory in the Coinbase case, where it alleged that nine digital assets offered by the exchange were unregistered securities, prompted Coinbase to file an interlocutory appeal. This strategic move challenges a key legal point in the dispute, namely the application of the Howey test to digital asset transactions.

The Howey test, established by the Supreme Court in 1946, is used to determine whether an investment contract qualifies as a security. Coinbase argues that its application to digital assets has created uncertainty and ambiguity in defining what constitutes a security.

Implications for Ripple and the Crypto Industry

The outcome of the SEC vs. Coinbase case has significant implications for the SEC vs. Ripple case, which is also centered around the classification of digital assets as securities. If Coinbase successfully challenges the SEC's regulatory stance, it could provide legal arguments that Ripple can leverage in its defense.

Conversely, an SEC victory would strengthen the regulator's position and potentially influence its approach to similar cases, including Ripple's. Moreover, developments in one case may inform regulatory policies and interpretations that could impact the broader crypto industry, including Ripple.

John E Deaton's Representation of Coinbase Customers

Attorney John E Deaton's representation of over 4,700 Coinbase customers is a testament to the growing importance of investor voices in regulatory matters. This move not only solidifies the bond between Ripple and Coinbase but also underscores the potential impact of the Coinbase case on the regulatory landscape for digital assets in the US.

The outcome of the SEC vs. Coinbase litigation could have far-reaching consequences for the cryptocurrency industry, shaping regulatory policies and providing clarity on the classification of digital assets. It is a case that will be closely watched by legal experts, investors, and industry stakeholders alike, with the potential to set precedents for the future of crypto regulation in the US.

免責聲明:info@kdj.com

所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!

如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。

2025年03月09日 其他文章發表於