特朗普總統的加密沙皇大衛·薩克斯（David Sacks）否認拋棄他的股份

特朗普總統的加密沙皇大衛·薩克斯（David Sacks）是美國加密政策中的關鍵人物，他對媒體報導說，他聲稱他“拋棄”了他的加密貨幣持有。

President Trump’s crypto czar, David Sacks, has hit back at media reports that claimed he had ‘dumped’ his cryptocurrency holdings.

特朗普總統的加密沙皇戴維·薩克斯（David Sacks）曾在媒體報導中反擊，聲稱他已經“拋棄”了他的加密貨幣持有。

Taking to X, Sacks, a key figure in U.S. crypto policy, clarified that his decision to sell was a required divestment, not a sudden sell-off meant to crash the market.

在美國加密貨幣政策中的關鍵人物X，Sacks上，他澄清說，他的決定是必需的撤資，而不是突然的拋售旨在使市場崩潰。

The controversy started when reports claimed that Sacks, the White House’s crypto policy leader, had offloaded his holdings despite the market remaining stable. This led to speculation that he had lost faith in the sector.

當報導稱白宮的加密政策負責人薩克斯（Sacks）仍然穩定，這一爭議開始了他的股份。這導致猜測他對該行業失去了信心。

However, Sacks noted that his decision had nothing to do with market trends and was purely a matter of following government rules.

但是，薩克斯指出，他的決定與市場趨勢無關，純粹是遵守政府規則的問題。

“Is it possible that the press could be making things up again? Apparently not. My firm, Craft Ventures, sold over $200 million in digital assets (BTC, ETH, SOL, etc.) as part of a complete and total divestment of assets required by the government before I began my role in the administration,” Sacks said in a tweet post on Thursday.

薩克斯在周四的一篇文章中說：“媒體可能會再次造成我的公司嗎？

The statement comes in response to a report by The Block, which asserted that Sacks's actions were "a striking scene in the drama of crypto's rise and fall." The report claimed that Sacks's actions would likely be viewed negatively by the crypto community.

該聲明是對該區塊的一份報告的回應，該報告斷言，薩克斯的舉動是“加密蛋糕興衰的戲劇中的一個驚人場景”。該報告聲稱，加密貨幣社區可能會對薩克斯的行為負面看法。

Sacks, however, expressed annoyance at the media's angle on the story, arguing that such narratives harm the image of cryptocurrency. He pointed out that crypto is often unfairly scrutinized, despite its growing role in the financial world.

然而，薩克斯對故事的角度表示煩惱，認為這種敘述會損害加密貨幣的形象。他指出，儘管加密貨幣在金融界中的作用越來越大，但經常受到不公正的審查。

“The angle of this story is interesting—the press is reporting it as a negative thing (which I guess makes sense since they do prefer bad news). But it's also ironic given how quickly and viciously they turn on anything they deem 'hot' or 'overhyped,'” he added.

他補充說：“這個故事的角度很有趣 - 媒體將其報告為負面的事情（我想這確實有意義，因為他們更喜歡壞消息）。

The statement aimed to reassure the crypto community that his decision was a legal requirement rather than a personal judgment on the market’s future.

該聲明旨在向加密貨幣社區保證，他的決定是法律要求，而不是對市場未來的個人判斷。

Sacks's post drew mixed reactions, with some showing support and others remaining skeptical. Many in the crypto space also spoke out against the media's take on the story.

薩克斯（Sacks）的帖子引起了混合反應，有些反應顯示支持，有些則保持持懷疑態度。加密空間中的許多人也反對媒體對故事的看法。

“They sell clicks, not ethics,” Binance's former CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ) commented on Friday, referring to the news articles that spun the narrative negatively.

Binance的前首席執行官Changpeng Zhao（CZ）週五評論說：“他們出售點擊，而不是道德。”

Similarly, David Nage from Arca argued that the media's narrative reflects a misunderstanding of cryptos.

同樣，來自阿爾卡（Arca）的大衛·納奇（David Nage）認為，媒體的敘述反映了對加密貨幣的誤解。

"The angle of the story is also ironic given how quickly and viciously the press turn on anything they deem 'hot' or 'overhyped.' But isn't that the nature of the news cycle? Perhaps we shouldn't be surprised," Nage added.

“故事的角度也具有諷刺意味的是，媒體將媒體打開他們認為'Hot'或“誇大其詞”的任何速度。但是，這不是新聞周期的性質嗎？

Even Bankless co-owner David Hoffman added another perspective, saying that many people outside of crypto don't want to believe in its success. He argued that negative headlines cater to those who feel uncomfortable seeing others profit from digital assets.

即使是無岸的共同所有者戴維·霍夫曼（David Hoffman）也增加了另一種觀點，他說，加密貨幣之外的許多人都不想相信其成功。他認為，負面的頭條新聞適合那些看到他人從數字資產中獲利的人感到不舒服。

"Everyone's making this story about the good or bad angle, but I think it hits on something else: A deep-seated skepticism towards anything that appears to generate easy riches, especially in an economic downturn, tends to fester in the minds of many," Hoffman stated.

霍夫曼說：“每個人都在做這個關於好是或壞角度的故事，但我認為這是對其他事情的打擊：對似乎產生容易的財富的任何事物的深深懷疑，尤其是在經濟衰退中，往往會在許多人的腦海中消失。”

With crypto becoming more political, the debate over regulations and government involvement will likely continue. But for now, Sacks remains firm his crypto sale wasn't a reckless move, but a necessary step under government rules.

隨著加密貨幣的政治發展，有關法規和政府參與的辯論可能會繼續。但是就目前而言，薩克斯仍然堅定他的加密貨幣出售不是魯ck的舉動，而是政府規定的必要步驟。