為什麼pepe青蛙硬幣會導致異常高的以太元素氣費

與經常以大型交易交易的USDT，USDC或Weth等主要的ERC-20代幣，Pepe大多在分散交易交易所（DEX）上以高頻，小價值的交易進行交易。

Ethereum gas fees are directly influenced by network demand, and certain tokens, like PEPE, have consistently caused extreme gas spikes compared to other ERC-20 tokens. This phenomenon can be attributed to a unique combination of factors related to PEPE's trading behavior and smart contract design. Here's a deeper analysis of how PEPE drives gas fees higher than other tokens.

與其他ERC-20代幣相比，某些令牌（如Pepe）始終引起極端的氣體峰值，以太坊氣體費用直接影響了網絡需求。這種現象可以歸因於與Pepe的交易行為和智能合約設計有關的獨特組合。這是對PEPE如何驅動汽油費用高於其他令牌的更深入的分析。

1. PEPE’s Extreme Trading Volume on Decentralized Exchanges (DEXs)

1。佩佩（Pepe）在分散交易所（DEX）上的極端交易量

Unlike major ERC-20 tokens like USDT, USDC, or WETH, which are often traded in large, infrequent transactions, PEPE is mostly traded in high-frequency, small-value transactions on decentralized exchanges (DEXs) like Uniswap.

與經常以大型交易交易的USDT，USDC或Weth等主要的ERC-20代幣，Pepe大多在分散交易交易所（DEX）上以高頻，小價值的交易進行交易。

How This Increases Gas Fees:

這如何增加汽油費：

✅ Uniswap swaps require more gas than simple token transfers (DEX interactions involve smart contracts, increasing complexity).

✅UNISWAP互換比簡單的令牌轉移需要更多的氣體（DEX相互作用涉及智能合約，增加複雜性）。

✅ PEPE’s volatility causes rapid buying and selling, increasing demand for transactions.

Pepe的波動性會導致快速買賣，從而增加了對交易的需求。

✅ More transactions = higher network congestion, making users bid more gas to prioritize their trades.

✅更多交易=更高的網絡擁塞，使用戶競標更多的汽油以優先考慮其交易。

Real-World Example:

現實世界示例：

🔹 During PEPE’s peak trading volume in April–May 2023, Uniswap swaps for PEPE accounted for over 30% of all Ethereum transactions, leading to gas fees exceeding $100 per swap.

🔹在佩佩（Pepe）2023年3月至3月的高峰交易量期間，PEPE的UNISWAP互換佔所有以太坊交易的30％以上，導致每次交易的汽油費用超過100美元。

In contrast, stablecoins like USDT or USDC are mostly used in large, single transfers, which require much less gas and don’t cause as much congestion.

相比之下，像USDT或USDC這樣的穩定​​幣大多用於大型單個轉移中，這些轉移需要更少的氣體，並且不會引起太多的擁塞。

2. The FOMO Effect: PEPE’s Retail Appeal Draws Thousands of Transactions

2。FOMO效應：Pepe的零售上訴吸引了數千筆交易

PEPE is a meme coin, meaning it attracts a different crowd compared to traditional Ethereum-based tokens. Retail investors, often driven by FOMO (fear of missing out), create a trading frenzy, further driving up gas fees.

佩佩（Pepe）是一種模因硬幣，這意味著與傳統的基於以太坊的令牌相比，它吸引了不同的人群。散戶投資者經常受到FOMO的驅動（擔心失踪），創造了一個瘋狂的貿易，進一步增加了汽油費。

How This Increases Gas Fees:

這如何增加汽油費：

✅ Retail traders place many small orders instead of a few large trades, leading to more transactions overall.

✅零售交易者下達了許多小訂單，而不是進行一些大型交易，從而導致更多的交易。

✅ Higher transaction volume fills Ethereum blocks quickly, forcing traders to outbid each other on gas prices to get their transactions processed faster.

✅較高的交易量迅速填補了以太坊的塊，迫使交易者在汽油價格上相互競爭，以使處理交易的速度更快。

✅ Bot activity & sniping add more congestion, as automated trading bots spam the network with rapid transactions.

自動交易機器人以快速交易的網絡垃圾郵件，機器人活動和狙擊會增加更多的擁塞。

Comparison With Other Tokens:

與其他令牌進行比較：

🔹 ETH & blue-chip ERC-20 tokens (e.g., LINK, UNI) → Traded in larger blocks, meaning fewer but higher-value transactions.

🔹ETH和Blue-Chip ERC-20令牌（例如，鏈接，Uni）→以較大的塊進行交易，這意味著更少但更高價值的交易。

🔹 PEPE & other meme coins → Traded in smaller, high-frequency transactions, leading to thousands of gas-consuming trades per hour.

Pepe和其他模因硬幣→進行較小的高頻交易，導致每小時數千美元的汽油交易。

This retail-driven micro-trading leads to Ethereum network congestion, increasing gas fees for all users.

這種零售驅動的微交易導致以太坊網絡擁堵，增加了所有用戶的汽油費用。

3. PEPE’s Smart Contract Inefficiencies Compared to Standard ERC-20 Tokens

3。與標準ERC-20令牌相比，Pepe的智能合同效率低下

Not all ERC-20 tokens use optimized smart contracts, and PEPE’s contract is less efficient than those of stablecoins or blue-chip tokens.

並非所有ERC-20代幣都使用優化的智能合約，而Pepe的合同效率不如Stablecoins或Blue-Chip令牌。

Why PEPE’s Contract Consumes More Gas:

為什麼Pepe的合同消耗更多的汽油：

🔸 Additional security & anti-bot mechanisms → PEPE’s smart contract has built-in protection against bots, which can make transactions more complex.

🔸其他安全和反機制機制→Pepe的智能合約對機器人具有內置保護，這可能會使交易更加複雜。

🔸 More contract interactions per trade → Every time PEPE is bought/sold, more computational steps are required than in standard ERC-20 transfers.

🔸每次交易的合同互動→每次購買/出售PEPE時，都需要比標準ERC-20轉移需要更多的計算步驟。

🔸 DEX liquidity pool mechanics → PEPE’s main trading venue is Uniswap, which requires more computational steps than centralized exchange trading.

🔸DEX流動性池力學→Pepe的主要交易場所是UNISWAP，它需要比集中式交易所交易更多的計算步驟。

Gas Cost Comparison (Typical Transactions):

天然氣成本比較（典型交易）：

💡 Insight: A single PEPE trade can use 2-3x more gas than an ETH or stablecoin swap, leading to higher fees across the Ethereum network.

💡洞察力：單一的Pepe貿易比ETH或Stablecoin交換的氣體多2-3倍，從而導致整個以太坊網絡的費用更高。

4. Bot Wars: Automated Trading Bots Contribute to Gas Spikes

4。機器人戰爭：自動交易機器人有助於汽油尖峰

PEPE’s explosive price moves have made it a prime target for MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) bots, which seek to exploit price inefficiencies. These bots aggressively compete for priority transactions, further increasing gas fees.

Pepe的爆炸性價格變動使其成為MEV（最大可提取價值）機器人的主要目標，該機器人試圖利用價格效率低下。這些機器人積極競爭優先交易，進一步增加了汽油費。

How Bots Contribute to Higher Gas Fees:

機器人如何促進更高的汽油費：

✔️ Front-running transactions → Bots pay extra gas to place their trades before retail traders.

✔️前運行交易→機器人支付額外的汽油，將其交易放在零售交易者面前。

✔️ Sandwich attacks → Bots execute multiple transactions in one block to profit off price fluctuations, further clogging the network.

✔️三明治攻擊→機器人在一個街區中執行多次交易，以獲利價格波動，進一步阻塞了網絡。

✔️ Sniping PEPE liquidity pools → Bots spam Ethereum with thousands of rapid transactions, competing for liquidity and causing gas price spikes.

✔️狙擊Pepe流動性池→Bots垃圾郵件以太坊具有成千上萬的快速交易，爭奪流動性並引起汽油價格峰值。

🔹 Example: During PEPE’s peak, MEV bots spent millions of dollars in gas fees to execute profitable arbitrage and front-running trades, making the situation even worse for regular users.

🔹示例：在佩佩（Pepe）的高峰期，梅夫機器人花了數百萬美元的汽油費來執行有利可圖的套利和領先的交易，從而使情況變得更糟。

5. High On-Chain Trading Activity Compared to CEX-Traded Tokens

5。與CEX交易的代幣相比，高鏈交易活動高

Unlike major ERC-20 tokens like AAVE, UNI, or LINK, which are primarily traded on centralized exchanges (CEXs), PEPE was initially only available on DEXs. This meant every PEPE trade had to be processed on-chain, consuming Ethereum’s block space.

與主要在集中式交易所（CEXS）交易的AAVE，UNI或LINK等主要ERC-20代幣不同，PEPE最初僅在DEX上可用。這意味著每個Pepe貿易都必須在鏈上處理，以消耗以太坊的塊空間。

Why

為什麼