誰是比特幣之謎背後的神秘力量？

2024 年 2 月，Online Gaming Company 對 1,000 名加密貨幣愛好者進行了調查，以揭開比特幣神秘創造者中本聰的身份。調查結果顯示候選人範圍廣泛，其中尼克·薩博(Nick Szabo) (40%)、哈爾·芬尼(Hal Finney) (35%) 和亞當·貝克(Adam Back) (12%) 成為最有力的競爭者。其他潛在候選人包括戴偉、Len Sassaman、Gavin Andersen、Craig Wright、Shinichi Mochizuki、Elon Musk 和 Dorian Nakamoto。

Who's Behind the Bitcoin Enigma?

誰是比特幣之謎的幕後黑手？

In February 2024, Online Gaming Company embarked on a mission to uncover the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, the elusive creator of Bitcoin. The company surveyed 1,000 cryptocurrency enthusiasts to gauge their opinions on potential candidates.

2024 年 2 月，線上遊戲公司開始執行一項任務，揭開難以捉摸的比特幣創造者中本聰的真實身分。該公司對 1,000 名加密貨幣愛好者進行了調查，以了解他們對潛在候選人的看法。

Top Suspects: A Who's Who of Crypto

頭號嫌疑犯：加密貨幣名人錄

The survey revealed a diverse cast of suspects, each with their own compelling credentials:

調查顯示了不同的嫌疑人，每個人都有自己令人信服的資歷：

1. Nick Szabo: The Digital Contract Architect

1. Nick Szabo：數位合約架構師

Leading the pack with 40% of the votes, Nick Szabo stands as a prime contender. His pioneering work on digital contracts and the creation of "Bit Gold," a precursor to Bitcoin, make him a strong match for the anonymous founder.

尼克·薩博 (Nick Szabo) 以 40% 的得票率領先，是主要競爭者。他在數位合約方面的開創性工作以及比特幣前身「Bit Gold」的創建，使他與這位匿名創始人非常匹配。

2. Hal Finney: The Bitcoin Pioneer

2.哈爾芬尼：比特幣先驅

Trailing closely behind at 35%, Hal Finney emerges as another formidable candidate. His involvement in the first Bitcoin transaction and his deep understanding of cryptography have solidified his reputation in the crypto community.

哈爾芬尼 (Hal Finney) 以 35% 的支持率緊隨其後，成為另一位強大的候選人。他參與第一筆比特幣交易以及對密碼學的深刻理解鞏固了他在加密社群的聲譽。

3. Adam Back: The Hashcash Creator

3. Adam Back：Hashcash 創造者

With 12% of the votes, Adam Back earns his place among the suspects. His creation of Hashcash, a critical component of Bitcoin's proof-of-work mechanism, strengthens his claim to the Bitcoin mantle.

亞當·巴克 (Adam Back) 憑藉 12% 的選票，在嫌疑犯中佔有一席之地。他創建的 Hashcash 是比特幣工作量證明機制的關鍵組成部分，這強化了他對比特幣衣缽的主張。

4. Wei Dai: The B-Money Innovator

4. Wei Dai：B-Money 創新者

Wei Dai, with 6% of the vote, is seen as a potential Nakamoto due to his development of b-money, a decentralized digital currency that predated Bitcoin. His early contributions to the field make him an intriguing possibility.

戴偉擁有 6% 的選票，因其開發了 b-money（一種早於比特幣的去中心化數位貨幣）而被視為潛在的中本聰。他早期對該領域的貢獻使他成為有趣的可能性。

5. Len Sassaman: The Privacy Advocate

5.Len Sassaman：隱私權倡議者

Len Sassaman, garnering 3% of the votes, is a lesser-known candidate but has intrigued some survey participants. His close ties to crypto experts and his focus on privacy align with the elusive nature of Nakamoto.

Len Sassaman 獲得 3% 的選票，是一位不太知名的候選人，但引起了一些調查參與者的興趣。他與加密貨幣專家的密切聯繫以及對隱私的關注與中本聰難以捉摸的本質一致。

6. Gavin Andersen: The Bitcoin Developer

6. 加文·安德森：比特幣開發者

Gavin Andersen, with 1.5% of the votes, is recognized for his early contributions to Bitcoin's development and his direct interactions with Nakamoto. His involvement in the project's infancy makes him a plausible candidate.

加文·安德森 (Gavin Andersen) 擁有 1.5% 的選票，因其對比特幣發展的早期貢獻以及與中本聰的直接互動而受到認可。他對該項目初期的參與使他成為一個看似合理的候選人。

7. Craig Wright: The Controversial Claimant

7. Craig Wright：有爭議的索賠人

Despite his public claims, only 1% of participants believe Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto. His credibility has been tarnished by ongoing debates and a lack of concrete evidence to support his assertions.

儘管克雷格·賴特公開宣稱，但只有 1% 的參與者認為他是中本聰。由於持續不斷的辯論和缺乏支持他的主張的具體證據，他的可信度受到損害。

8. Shinichi Mochizuki: The Mathematical Enigma

8.望月新一：數學之謎

Shinichi Mochizuki, with a mere 0.5% of the vote, is considered an unlikely Nakamoto due to his limited computer science background and lack of ties to the cypherpunk community.

望月新一 (Shinichi Mochizuki) 的得票率僅為 0.5%，由於他有限的電腦科學背景以及與密碼龐克社群缺乏聯繫，他被認為不太可能是中本聰。

9. Elon Musk: The Tech Titan

9.伊隆馬斯克：科技巨頭

Elon Musk, also with 0.5% of the votes, ranks ninth on the list. While acknowledging his brilliance, participants question his involvement in Bitcoin's early days.

伊隆馬斯克也以 0.5% 的得票率排名第九。在承認他的才華的同時，參與者質疑他對比特幣早期的參與。

10. Dorian Nakamoto: The Misidentified Suspect

10. 多里安·中本：被誤認的嫌疑人

Dorian Nakamoto, with only 0.4% of the votes, reflects the general skepticism surrounding his alleged connection to Bitcoin. His lack of technical knowledge and disinterest in the cryptocurrency cast doubt on his involvement.

Dorian Nakamoto 僅獲得 0.4% 的選票，反映出人們普遍對他與比特幣的所謂聯繫持懷疑態度。他缺乏技術知識並且對加密貨幣不感興趣，這讓人們對他的參與產生了懷疑。

The Enigma Unraveled?

謎團解開了嗎？

The survey's findings shed light on the speculation surrounding Satoshi Nakamoto's identity. However, the mystery remains unsolved, with no clear consensus emerging from the participants' opinions.

該調查的結果揭示了圍繞中本聰身份的猜測。然而，謎團仍未解開，參與者的意見也沒有形成明確的共識。

Wright's Claims Debunked

賴特的說法被揭穿

In a recent twist, a British judge dismissed Craig Wright's claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto. The court found no evidence to support Wright's assertions and concluded that he is not the author of the Bitcoin whitepaper or the creator of the Bitcoin software.

最近出現的轉折是，一位英國法官駁回了克雷格·賴特 (Craig Wright) 的自稱是中本聰 (Satoshi Nakamoto) 的說法。法院沒有發現任何證據支持賴特的主張，並得出結論，他不是比特幣白皮書的作者或比特幣軟體的創建者。

The Search Continues

搜尋仍在繼續

The quest to uncover Satoshi Nakamoto's true identity continues. As Bitcoin's influence grows, so too does the curiosity about its enigmatic founder. The cryptocurrency community eagerly awaits the day when the mystery is finally solved.

揭開中本聰真實身分的探索仍在繼續。隨著比特幣影響力的增強，人們對其神秘創始人的好奇心也隨之增強。加密貨幣社群熱切等待著謎團最終解開的那一天。