Moe Vela 抨擊川普的 The Defant Ones 加密平台：“行動勝於雄辯”

聽到川普組織——Truth Social (DJT) 背後的組織——準備透過其名為 The DeFiant Ones 的平台進軍加密貨幣市場，商界多少感到震驚。

Former Biden Administration Senior Advisor and Unicoin Senior Advisor Moe Vela joined us for a question-and-answer segment on the matter, and here is what he had to say.

前拜登政府高級顧問和 Unicoin 高級顧問 Moe Vela 加入我們就此事進行問答環節，以下是他不得不說的內容。

1. Tell us more about The DeFiant Ones. Give us a general summary of what the service is and how it differs from currently operating exchanges that are more established in the field.

1. 告訴我們更多關於 Defant Ones 的資訊。請向我們概述一下該服務是什麼，以及它與該領域目前正在運營的交易所有何不同。

Frankly, little is known about what they plan on doing with this proposed platform. At this point, it’s pure speculation as to what “digital real estate” will mean from a practical perspective or what this “digital bank” platform truly entails. What further clouds all of this is how it will maneuver in and around existing and future regulatory environments.

坦白說，人們對他們計劃利用這個提議的平台做什麼知之甚少。目前，從實際角度來看「數位房地產」意味著什麼，或者這個「數位銀行」平台真正意味著什麼，這純粹是猜測。進一步籠罩所有這一切的是它將如何在現有和未來的監管環境中及其周圍進行操作。

2. Will The DeFiant Ones be able to continue operating past November in the event of a Harris presidency?

2. 如果哈里斯當選總統，DeFiant Ones 能否在 11 月之後繼續營運？

If Trump Steaks and Trump University are any indication, this could very well be just another publicity stunt by the Trumps, and it might not even get off the ground, much less make it past the election.

如果川普牛排和川普大學有任何跡象的話，這很可能只是川普家族的另一個宣傳噱頭，它甚至可能無法啟動，更不用說通過選舉了。

3. What features would make The DeFiant Ones better able to survive in the field that aren’t already known? What would you suggest it add to better protect itself from its currently operating competitors?

3. 哪些功能可以讓 The Defant Ones 在未知領域中更好生存？您建議它添加哪些內容以更好地保護自己免受當前營運競爭對手的侵害？

The Trumps would need to de-politicize their proposed platform, in my opinion, in order to win any semblance of mass appeal. The mere fact that their brand and its tremendous past failures and bankruptcies affiliated with that brand would mean they should outsource the management of this new platform should it come to fruition.

在我看來，川普家族需要將他們提出的平台去政治化，才能贏得任何表面上的大眾吸引力。他們的品牌以及與該品牌相關的過去的巨大失敗和破產這一事實本身就意味著，如果這個新平台能夠實現的話，他們應該將其管理外包。

4. You claim that Trump “cannot be trusted to lay the framework for a stable crypto future,” in large part due to previous opposition. What steps should he take to demonstrate that he can be trusted with such an effort?

4. 您聲稱川普“不能被信任為穩定的加密貨幣未來奠定框架”，這在很大程度上是由於先前的反對。他應該採取什麼措施來證明他的這種努力值得信任？

Actions speak louder than words, and when Vice President Harris hired two crypto experts on her senior campaign team, it demonstrated exactly the type of actions that develop trust, credibility, and viability. Mr. Trump, so far, has done nothing more than express political bluster in support of cryptocurrency and continues to simply tell people what they want to hear. If I were advising him, I would suggest he practice what he preaches and spell out specific policies and regulatory platforms as it relates to cryptocurrency.

行動勝於雄辯，當副總統哈里斯在她的高級競選團隊中聘請了兩名加密貨幣專家時，這恰恰證明了建立信任、可信度和可行性的行動類型。到目前為止，川普除了表達支持加密貨幣的政治咆哮之外什麼也沒做，並繼續簡單地告訴人們他們想聽到什麼。如果我為他提供建議，我會建議他言出必行，並闡明與加密貨幣相關的具體政策和監管平台。

5. You claim that Trump’s “past opposition to cryptocurrencies” makes his current statements “…little more than pandering.” How is this different from Jamie Dimon’s heel-face turn on crypto, where he went from planning to fire any trader that handled Bitcoin (Bloomberg, September 2017) to actively embracing it at JPMorgan (CoinDesk, December 2023)?

5. 您聲稱川普「過去對加密貨幣的反對」使得他目前的言論「…只不過是迎合而已」。這與 Jamie Dimon 對加密貨幣的徹底轉變有何不同？

Mr. Dimon is not running for President of the United States, nor does he have a history of reckless, irresponsible, and pandering statements. As a staunch supporter of the crypto community myself, I applaud and welcome anyone who wants to help us grow this sector while protecting investors from fraudulent and nefarious actors. Mr. Trump’s entire career, past and continuous pandering statements, and hateful and divisive remarks on almost every topic known to man make it very difficult to trust him or believe he is at all sincere in his comments on cryptocurrency.

戴蒙先生沒有競選美國總統，也沒有魯莽、不負責任和迎合性言論的歷史。作為加密貨幣社群的堅定支持者，我讚揚並歡迎任何想要幫助我們發展這個行業，同時保護投資者免受欺詐和邪惡行為者侵害的人。川普先生的整個職業生涯，過去和持續的迎合言論，以及對人類已知的幾乎每個話題的仇恨和分裂言論，使得人們很難相信他或相信他對加密貨幣的評論是真誠的。