Memecoin 的激增在安全困境中推動了 Coinbase 的 Layer 2

自從以太坊第 2 層實施 Dencun 升級以來，Coinbase 的 Base 經歷了用戶、交易和鎖定總價值的激增，這主要是由投機性 memecoin 交易推動的。然而，一項調查顯示，大多數 Base memecoin 都存在安全漏洞，可能會導致重大財務損失，其中近五分之一是故意惡意並採用各種策略竊取用戶資金。

Base Surge: Memecoin Frenzy Propels Coinbase's Layer 2 Amidst Security Concerns

基礎激增：Memecoin 狂熱在安全擔憂中推動 Coinbase 的第 2 層

The Dencun upgrade has ignited a surge in adoption and activity on Base, Coinbase's permissionless layer 2 solution for Ethereum. This surge is largely driven by the proliferation of memecoins, a class of digital assets known for their speculative nature and lack of intrinsic value. While memecoin trading has fueled rapid growth on Base, it has also raised significant security concerns.

Dencun 升級引發了 Base 的採用和活動激增，Base 是 Coinbase 的以太坊無需許可的第 2 層解決方案。這種激增很大程度上是由模因幣的激增推動的，模因幣是一類以其投機性和缺乏內在價值而聞名的數位資產。雖然 memecoin 交易推動了 Base 的快速成長，但它也引發了重大的安全問題。

Security Analysis of Base Memecoins Reveals Widespread Vulnerabilities

基礎 Memecoin 的安全分析揭示了廣泛存在的漏洞

An extensive security analysis conducted by Magazine revealed that a staggering 90.8% of 1,000 newly launched Base tokens failed to implement fundamental security measures, such as locked liquidity, verified contracts, and absence of honeypots. These security flaws expose users to potential financial losses and malicious activities.

Magazine 進行的廣泛安全分析顯示，在 1,000 個新推出的 Base 代幣中，高達 90.8% 的代幣未能實施基本安全措施，例如鎖定流動性、驗證合約和不存在蜜罐。這些安全缺陷使用戶面臨潛在的財務損失和惡意活動。

Deliberate Scams and Fraudulent Practices Prevalent

蓄意詐欺和詐欺行為盛行

Disturbingly, the analysis also uncovered that a significant proportion of Base memecoins (16.9%) exhibit malicious intent, using deceptive tactics to steal user funds. These scams include honeypots, which prevent users from selling tokens, and exaggerated sales "taxes" that siphon away investor capital.

令人不安的是，分析還發現很大一部分 Base memecoin（16.9%）表現出惡意意圖，使用欺騙手段竊取用戶資金。這些騙局包括阻止用戶出售代幣的蜜罐，以及吸走投資者資金的誇大銷售「稅」。

Honeypots: The Subterfuge of Base Scams

蜜罐：基地詐騙的詭計

Honeypots are a particularly insidious type of scam that lures investors with the promise of high returns but ultimately prevents them from cashing out their profits. These contracts contain malicious code that restricts token transfers, effectively trapping user funds.

蜜罐是一種特別陰險的騙局，它以高回報的承諾來吸引投資者，但最終阻止他們兌現利潤。這些合約包含限制代幣轉移的惡意程式碼，有效地捕獲了用戶資金。

Liquidity Pools: A Target for Rug Pulls

流動性池：地毯拉動的目標

The most prevalent security vulnerability among Base memecoins lies in their liquidity pools. A total of 90.5% of the analyzed tokens did not lock their liquidity, making them susceptible to rug pulls. Rug pulls occur when developers withdraw liquidity from the pool, abandoning the project and leaving investors with worthless tokens.

基礎模因幣中最普遍的安全漏洞在於其流動性池。總共 90.5% 的分析代幣沒有鎖定其流動性，這使得它們容易受到拉動的影響。當開發商從池中撤回流動性、放棄項目並給投資者留下毫無價值的代幣時，就會發生拉動。

Unverified Contracts: A Red Flag for Potential Scams

未經驗證的合約：潛在詐騙的危險信號

Of the tokens with unlocked liquidity, nearly a quarter (230) also lacked verified contracts. Verified contracts allow investors to review the code and assess potential risks, providing a level of transparency and accountability. The absence of verified contracts raises further concerns about the legitimacy and trustworthiness of these projects.

在具有解鎖流動性的代幣中，近四分之一（230 個）也缺乏經過驗證的合約。經過驗證的合約允許投資者審查代碼並評估潛在風險，提供一定程度的透明度和問責制。缺乏經過驗證的合約進一步引發了人們對這些項目的合法性和可信度的擔憂。

Coinbase's Neutrality Amidst the Security Concerns

Coinbase 在安全疑慮中保持中立

Coinbase, the custodian of Base, has maintained a neutral stance regarding the security vulnerabilities discovered in memecoins. The company emphasizes the permissionless nature of Base, allowing projects to launch without endorsement or vetting. However, Coinbase acknowledges the ongoing efforts to enhance on-chain technology and make it more accessible and secure.

Base 的託管人 Coinbase 對於 memecoin 中發現的安全漏洞一直保持中立立場。該公司強調 Base 的無需許可的性質，允許專案在沒有認可或審查的情況下啟動。然而，Coinbase 承認我們正在努力增強鏈上技術並使其更易於存取和安全。

Memecoin Frenzy Fuels Base Adoption, but Raises Concerns

Memecoin 狂熱推動了基礎採用，但引發了擔憂

The influx of memecoins on Base has propelled the platform to new highs in terms of user activity, transactions, and total value locked. However, the ease of launching tokens on Base, coupled with the prevalence of security vulnerabilities and scams, has sparked debate within the industry.

Base 上 memecoin 的湧入推動該平台在用戶活躍度、交易量和鎖定總價值方面創下新高。然而，在 Base 發行代幣的便利性，加上安全漏洞和詐騙的盛行，引發了業界的爭論。

Supporters and Critics Debate the Impact of Memecoins

支持者和批評者爭論模因幣的影響

Supporters of memecoins argue that they attract new investors to the cryptocurrency space, contributing to overall growth and adoption. However, critics express concerns about the potential for financial losses and the negative impact memecoins could have on the credibility of the industry.

迷因幣的支持者認為，它們吸引了新的投資者進入加密貨幣領域，有助於整體成長和採用。然而，批評者對迷因幣可能造成的經濟損失以及對該行業信譽可能產生的負面影響表示擔憂。

Conclusion: A Balancing Act Between Innovation and Security

結論：創新與安全之間的平衡之舉

The surge in memecoin activity on Base highlights the complexities of balancing innovation with security in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. While memecoins can drive adoption and excitement, they also introduce significant risks for users. It is crucial for investors to exercise caution, conduct thorough research, and prioritize security when interacting with Base memecoins.

Base 上 memecoin 活動的激增凸顯了在加密貨幣生態系統中平衡創新與安全的複雜性。雖然模因幣可以推動採用和興奮，但它們也給用戶帶來了重大風險。投資者在與 Base memecoin 互動時務必謹慎行事、進行徹底研究並優先考慮安全性。

Despite the challenges, the ongoing evolution of Base and the broader cryptocurrency landscape promises continued innovation and opportunities. As the industry matures, it is essential to strike a balance between fostering creativity and safeguarding user funds, ensuring the long-term sustainability and credibility of the crypto ecosystem.

儘管面臨挑戰，Base 的不斷發展和更廣泛的加密貨幣格局有望持續創新和機會。隨著產業的成熟，必須在培養創造力和保護用戶資金之間取得平衡，確保加密生態系統的長期可持續性和可信度。