美國自由金融公司（WLFI）的一家美元穩定股（WLFI）是一個與唐納德·特朗普總統的家人相關的加密貨幣平台，這是一家美元的穩定穩定性，這引起了國會的關注。

3月推出的Stablecoin是隨著立法者制定Stablecoin立法而進行的，有些人擔心這可能會使兩黨通過監管框架的努力變得複雜。

The launch of USD1, a U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoin by World Liberty Financial (WLFI), a cryptocurrency platform linked to President Donald Trump’s family, is drawing concerns in Congress.

美國自由金融公司（WLFI）的一家美元穩定股（WLFI）是一個與唐納德·特朗普總統的家人相關的加密貨幣平台，這是一家美元的穩定穩定股，這是國會的關注點。

The stablecoin, launched in March, comes as lawmakers work on stablecoin legislation, and some lawmakers fear it could complicate bipartisan efforts to pass legislation.

該穩定者於3月發起，隨著立法者制定Stablecoin立法，一些立法者擔心這可能會使兩黨制定的努力複雜化，以通過立法。

While some view the launch of USD1 as a positive step for crypto adoption in the U.S., others worry about potential conflicts of interest due to Trump’s family’s involvement in the stablecoin.

儘管有些人認為USD1的推出是在美國採用加密貨幣的積極步驟，但其他人則擔心由於特朗普的家人參與Stablecoin而導致潛在的利益衝突。

Several Democrats, including Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), have criticized the project.

包括參議員伊麗莎白·沃倫（D-MA）在內的幾位民主黨人批評了該項目。

Earlier this year, Warren referred to USD1 as a “grift.” She also suggested that any legislation benefiting stablecoin issuers could financially benefit Trump’s family, which she claimed would be a conflict of interest.

今年早些時候，沃倫將USD1稱為“ Grift”。她還建議，任何受益於Stablecoin發行人的立法都可以在經濟上受益於特朗普的家庭，她聲稱這將是利益衝突。

"If they're going to be pushing legislation that benefits stablecoin issuers, then that's going to create a conflict of interest with the president's family's involvement in USD1," said a Democratic aide. "And it's going to be clear to everyone that any delay in passing such bills would align with President Trump's interests."

一位民主黨助手說：“如果他們要推動受益於穩定發行人的立法，那麼這將與總統家人參與USD1造成利益衝突。” “對於每個人來說，通過此類法案的任何延誤都將與特朗普總統的利益保持一致。”

However, Trump’s increasing involvement in the crypto sector, including meme coins, NFTs, and Bitcoin mining, is creating additional challenges for lawmakers.

但是，特朗普越來越多地參與加密貨幣領域，包括模因硬幣，NFTS和比特幣採礦，正在為立法者帶來其他挑戰。

"It's no secret that President Trump has been a vocal supporter of cryptocurrency throughout his presidency," said Rep. French Hill (R-AR), a member of the House Financial Services Committee. "But his recent activities, especially related to stablecoins, are making it harder to pass meaningful legislation."

眾議院金融服務委員會成員眾議員法國希爾（R-AR）說：“特朗普總統在整個總統任期內一直是加密貨幣的聲音支持者，這並不是什麼秘密了。” “但是他最近的活動，尤其是與穩定的活動，使得通過有意義的立法變得更加困難。”

As a result, critics fear that the growing political entanglement could delay efforts to pass the bills.

結果，批評家擔心，日益增長的政治糾纏可能會延遲通過法案的努力。

"Both the GENIUS Act and the STABLE Act have bipartisan support and are moving toward final approval," said an aide to a House Republican.

一位共和黨人的助手說：“《天才法案》和《穩定法》都得到了兩黨的支持，並正在朝著最終批准。”

The STABLE Act, which stands for "Stablecoin Transparency and Enforcement Laborious Explicable") Act, is expected to be voted on by the House Financial Services Committee 'very soon,' according to multiple sources.

據多個消息人士稱，該法案代表“ Stablecoin透明度和實施費用的可解釋”法案，預計將由眾議院金融服務委員會投票。

The bipartisan GENIUS Act, which stands for "Grading and Evaluating New Interoperable Systems," is being advanced by Senators Bill Hagerty (R-TN) and Mark Warner (D-VA).

參議員比爾·哈格蒂（R-TN）和馬克·華納（Mark Warner）（D-VA）提出了《兩黨天才法》，該法案代表“分級和評估新的可互操作系統”。

Both bills aim to offer clarity for the stablecoin market but differ on how foreign issuers like Tether should be regulated.

這兩項法案旨在為Stablecoin市場提供清晰度，但在像Tether這樣的外國發行人的監管方面有所不同。

Rep. Bryan Steil (R-WI), chair of the House panel on digital assets, indicated that while the bills are 80% similar, they still need to be reconciled before moving forward.

眾議院數字資產小組主席眾議員布萊恩·史蒂爾（R-WI）表示，儘管賬單相似，但仍需要對其進行調和，然後才能繼續前進。

Despite concerns, stablecoin bills are moving toward final approval. However, Trump’s involvement is complicating the process, and some believe that the stablecoin debate may be delayed or influenced by political considerations.

儘管有擔憂，但Stablecoin法案仍在朝著最終批准。但是，特朗普的參與使這一過程變得複雜，有些人認為，穩定的辯論可能會受到政治考慮的延遲或影響。

This ongoing issue highlights the tension between crypto innovation and regulatory oversight in the United States.

這一持續的問題凸顯了美國加密創新與監管監督之間的緊張關係。