市值: $2.7526T 4.320%
體積(24小時): $84.5529B -5.030%
  • 市值: $2.7526T 4.320%
  • 體積(24小時): $84.5529B -5.030%
  • 恐懼與貪婪指數:
  • 市值: $2.7526T 4.320%
Cryptos
主題
Cryptospedia
資訊
CryptosTopics
影片
Top News
Cryptos
主題
Cryptospedia
資訊
CryptosTopics
影片
bitcoin
bitcoin

$82833.083289 USD

-0.64%

ethereum
ethereum

$1895.772539 USD

0.28%

tether
tether

$0.999901 USD

-0.01%

xrp
xrp

$2.318667 USD

2.23%

bnb
bnb

$580.792401 USD

0.44%

solana
solana

$125.858295 USD

-0.69%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999913 USD

-0.02%

cardano
cardano

$0.722211 USD

-0.37%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.169527 USD

-1.07%

tron
tron

$0.221501 USD

-1.36%

pi
pi

$1.578559 USD

-7.83%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.783397 USD

0.76%

chainlink
chainlink

$14.039280 USD

5.24%

stellar
stellar

$0.282425 USD

3.40%

hedera
hedera

$0.192278 USD

-2.56%

加密貨幣新聞文章

想像一個世界,您的數字身份確實是您自己的

2025/03/13 06:06

這不是烏托邦的願景,而是在數字主權是基本權利的時代,社交媒體的必要演變。

想像一個世界,您的數字身份確實是您自己的

The article "A New Future for TikTok: Decentralization and the Fight for Digital Sovereignty" discusses the increasing attention on user-driven social media platforms with the recent news of potential buyers lining up for TikTok. However, the article argues that the focus should shift from who owns the platform to how it's governed.

文章“ Tiktok:權力下放和爭取數字主權的鬥爭的新未來”討論了對用戶驅動的社交媒體平台的越來越多的關注,而最近的潛在買家為Tiktok排隊而言。但是,本文認為,重點應該從誰擁有該平台轉變為其管理方式。

Highlighting the initiative by Project Liberty's technology team to develop Frequency, a public, permissionless blockchain designed specifically for high-volume social networking, and its collaboration with Alexis Ohanian, the co-founder of Reddit, and Kevin O'Leary, renowned investor and entrepreneur known for his role on Shark Tank, to take TikTok on-chain.

強調了Project Liberty的技術團隊的倡議,這是一個專門針對高批量社交網絡設計的公眾,無許可的區塊鏈,以及與Reddit的聯合創始人Alexis Ohanian和Kevin O'Leary,著名的投資者和Entrepreneur在Shark Tank上的角色而聞名的凱文·奧利裡(Kevin O'Leary)的共同創始人Alexis Ohanian。

Together, these initiatives aim to move social media away from corporate ownership and toward an open, user-controlled model.

這些舉措共同將社交媒體從公司所有權轉移到開放,用戶控制的模型中。

The article also touches upon Bluesky, an open-source social media project, in its effort to create a more decentralized future for social media. It offers a glimpse into what a decentralized social web could look like, but key vulnerabilities remain.

這篇文章還涉及了一個開源社交媒體項目藍軍(Bluesky),旨在為社交媒體創造更加分散的未來。它可以瞥見分散的社交網絡的外觀,但仍然存在關鍵漏洞。

Key Takeaways:

關鍵要點:

* Project Liberty's technology team has developed Frequency, a public, permissionless blockchain designed specifically for high-volume social networking, to reinforce the foundation of a user-driven internet, prioritizing interoperability, data sovereignty, and resilience against centralized control.

* Project Liberty的技術團隊已開發出頻率,這是一個專門為高批量社交網絡設計的公眾,無權的區塊鏈,旨在增強用戶驅動的互聯網的基礎,優先考慮互操作性,數據主權和反對集中控制的彈性。

* These initiatives aim to move social media away from corporate ownership and toward an open, user-controlled model.

*這些舉措旨在將社交媒體從公司所有權轉移到開放,用戶控制的模型中。

* Bluesky, an open-source social media project, is one attempt to answer the call for decentralization.

* Bluesky是一個開源社交媒體項目,是回答權力下放呼籲的一種嘗試。

* True digital liberation demands more than good intentions; it requires a structural commitment to full decentralization.

*真正的數字解放需要的不僅僅是良好的意圖;它需要對全面權力下放的結構承諾。

* Frequency operates on the principle of minimal, purposeful decentralization, making long-term sustainability of the ecosystem at population scale viable.

*頻率基於最小,有目的的權力下放的原則,使人口規模的生態系統的長期可持續性可行。

* The only data stored on-chain is what’s essential to guarantee individual data rights.

*唯一存儲在鏈上的數據是保證個人數據權利的必要條件。

* This design approach allows for efficient chain optimization focused on core social events, primarily activity related to account, graph, and communication primitives.

*這種設計方法允許有效的連鎖優化專注於核心社交事件,這主要是與帳戶,圖形和通信原始相關的活動。

* This focus on core social allows for tokenized incentives to be designed around management of network capacity, with specific incentives for creators, consumers, and other more specific actors left to higher levels of the technology stack.

*對核心社會的關注,可以圍繞網絡容量的管理設計令牌化的激勵措施,並為創建者,消費者和其他更具體的參與者提供了特定的激勵措施,而這些獎勵的技術堆棧水平較高。

* Frequency ensures that users have cryptographic protection over their personal data, along with granular controls that dictate how their data is shared.

*頻率可確保用戶對個人數據具有加密保護,並確保顆粒狀控件決定其數據的共享方式。

* They also have the flexibility to impose platform-specific restrictions, ensuring that their content appears only in the digital spaces where they want it to be seen.

*他們還具有施加特定於平台的限制的靈活性,確保其內容僅出現在他們希望看到的數字空間中。

* Crucially, they must be able to delete their content at their discretion.

*至關重要的是,他們必須能夠自行決定刪除其內容。

* They should also have the power to restrict content to specific platforms if they choose to do so.

*如果他們選擇這樣做,他們還應該有權將內容限制為特定平台。

* This approach directly addresses the fundamental roadblocks that have prevented previous attempts at decentralization from scaling.

*這種方法直接解決了阻礙先前嘗試權力下放試圖擴展的基本障礙。

* Frequency ensures that no single entity—not even its own node operators—has the power to alter or censor user data.

*頻率確保沒有​​單個實體(甚至其自己的節點運算符)具有更改或審查用戶數據的能力。

* It provides a decentralized backup of Bluesky's Firehose, ensuring that user-generated content remains accessible beyond the control of a single party.

*它提供了對藍調的Firehose的分散備份,以確保用戶生成的內容在單一方面的控制之外仍然可以訪問。

* Its architecture is designed not just for ideological purity but also for practical sustainability and scalability, offering minimal latency and cost-efficient operations to ensure the system remains viable for mass adoption.

*它的架構不僅是為了意識形態純度,而且是為了實用的可持續性和可擴展性,提供了最小的延遲和成本效益的操作,以確保系統對大規模採用仍然可行。

The article concludes by stating that the internet was meant to be open, interconnected, and free. Today, we stand at a crossroads: either we continue to rely on corporate-controlled social media, or we take the necessary steps to create a more open, user-owned digital future.

本文總結說,互聯網本來應該是開放,互連和免費的。今天,我們站在一個十字路口:我們要么繼續依靠公司控制的社交媒體,要么我們採取必要的步驟來創建一個更開放的用戶擁有的數字未來。

Bluesky is a step forward, but without addressing its remaining points of centralization, it risks becoming just another walled garden, perhaps a slightly more open one, but still one where users lack true control. TikTok presents an even bigger challenge. The debate over its ownership misses the point. The real question isn't who should own TikTok, but whether any social media giant should be owned at all in the traditional sense. Decentralization offers a new way forward, one where platforms are built around user sovereignty, rather than corporate control.

藍軍是向前邁出的一步,但是如果沒有解決其剩餘的集中點,它可能會成為另一個圍牆的花園,也許是一個更開放的花園,但仍然是用戶缺乏真正控制的一個花園。 Tiktok提出了一個更大的挑戰。關於其所有權的辯論錯過了這一點。真正的問題不是誰應該擁有Tiktok,而是在傳統意義上是否應該擁有任何社交媒體巨頭。權力下放提供了一種新的前進方向,即圍繞用戶主權而不是公司控制的平台建立平台。

With Frequency, we are moving one step closer to reclaiming the original promise of the internet. True digital liberation requires breaking free from the data monopolies that have defined the social media era. This isn't just a technological upgrade; it's a necessary shift in power.

隨著頻率,我們越來越近一步,以收回互聯網的原始承諾。真正的數字解放需要擺脫定義社交媒體時代的數據壟斷。這不僅僅是技術升級;這是權力的必要轉變。

免責聲明:info@kdj.com

所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!

如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。

2025年03月15日 其他文章發表於