Coinbase的基本第2層網絡意外推出了一個令牌，市場爆炸

Base的官方X帳戶刪除了“ Base Is For Allosh”一詞，然後是一個帖子，上面寫著“ Just Coin It”，鏈接到Zora

Coinbase's Layer 2 network Base unintentionally kicked off one of the most chaotic experiments in recent Web3 memory. It started with a simple post "Base is for everyone".

Coinbase的第2層網絡基礎無意間揭開了最近Web3內存中最混亂的實驗之一。它始於簡單的帖子“ Base Is for所有人”。

Base is for everyone. pic.twitter.com/gq3lLLuXO1

基礎適合所有人。 pic.twitter.com/gq3llluxo1

— Base (@base) April 16, 2025

- 基礎（@base）2025年4月16日

What followed was an experimental token launch, market mania, backlash, and a broader conversation on the future of tokenized content.

隨之而來的是實驗令牌發布，市場躁狂，反彈以及關於令牌化內容的未來的更廣泛的對話。

The Spark: A Tweet, a Token, and a Frenzy

火花：一條推文，一個令牌和瘋狂

Base's official X account dropped the phrase "Base is for everyone" followed by a post that read "just coin it", linking to Zora, a platform that allows content to be minted as tokens.

Base的官方X帳戶刪除了“ Base Is For Allosh”一詞，然後是一個帖子，上面寫著“ Just Coin It”，鏈接到Zora，該平台允許內容鑄造為代幣。

Just coin it. https://t.co/RB6BF9wrjh

只是硬幣。 https://t.co/rb6bf9wrjh

— Base (@base) April 16, 2025

- 基礎（@base）2025年4月16日

That seemingly innocent link led to the creation of an ERC-20 token titled "Base is for everyone". Although Zora posted a disclaimer clarifying it wasn't official, the damage, or rather the excitement, was already in motion.

看似無辜的鏈接導致創建了ERC-20的象徵性題為“ base Is for所有人”。儘管佐拉（Zora）發布了一個免責聲明，但它不是正式的，但損害或興奮已經在運動中。

Within hours, the token exploded to a $17 million market cap, crashed by 94% to nearly $1 million, and then rebounded to over $23 million, all in less than 12 hours.

在幾個小時內，代幣爆炸到了1700萬美元的市值，跌至94％至近100萬美元，然後反彈至2300萬美元，不到12小時。

At the time of writing, it's sitting around $14 million with over $33 million in trading volume, according to the data by DEXScreener.

DexScreener的數據顯示，在撰寫本文時，它的交易量超過3300萬美元。

Who Benefited?

誰受益？

While thousands of wallets jumped into the speculative craze, a few made out with profits.

雖然成千上萬的錢包跳入投機性熱潮，但一些錢包以利潤獲利。

One wallet, 0x0992, bought 256 million tokens for just 1.5 ETH (~$2,370) and sold them for 108 ETH (~$170,400), pocketing a massive $168,000 profit. The other two, 0x5D9D and 0xBD31 made profits of $266,000 and $231,800, respectively.

一個錢包，0x0992，以1.5 eth（〜2,370美元）的價格購買了2.56億個令牌，以108 ETH（約170,400美元）出售了它們，賺了168,000美元的利潤。另外兩個，0x5D9D和0xBD31分別賺了266,000美元和231,800美元。

Another wallet, 0x5D9D, also raked in profits, while three wallets altogether made around $666,000 on the day, according to Lookonchain.

根據Lookonchain的說法，另一個錢包0x5D9D也獲得了利潤，而三個錢包當天賺了666,000美元。

3 wallets bought a large amount of "Base is for everyone" before @base posted and sold them, making a profit of ~$666K.

3個錢包在@Base發布並出售它們之前購買了大量“基礎是每個人”，賺取了約66.6萬美元的利潤。

0x0992 spent 1.5 $ETH($2,370) to buy 256.39M "Base is for everyone", and sold all for 108 $ETH($170.4K), making $168K.https://t.co/1QSP9LDMF8

0x0992花費了1.5 $ eth（$ 2,370）購買25639萬美元的“基礎是每個人”，並以108美元的eth（$ 170.4K）出售，賺了$ 168K.https：//t.co/1qsp9ldmf8

0x5D9D spent 1... pic.twitter.com/1lrSydphxP

0x5d9d花費1 ... pic.twitter.com/1lrsydphxp

— Lookonchain (@lookonchain) April 17, 2025

- lookonchain（@lookonchain）2025年4月17日

Unsurprisingly, this led to accusations of insider sniping, with Harrison Leggio (aka “Pop Punk”) calling it “HORRIFICALLY sniped”.

毫不奇怪，這導致了內幕狙擊的指控，哈里森·萊吉奧（Harrison Leggio）（又名“流行朋克”）稱其為“恐怖片”。

Base token on Zora was HORRIFICALLY sniped.

佐拉（Zora）上的基本令牌令人震驚。

From a quick look, here's 2 wallets that purchased 21% of the supply for 2 ETH.

從快速看，這裡有2個錢包，購買了2個ETH的21％的供應量。

They then transferred to other wallets and sold for $300k profit.

然後，他們轉移到其他錢包，以30萬美元的利潤出售。

This is what can happen if you don't have snipe protection… pic.twitter.com/FT4kNWPtoQ

如果您沒有狙擊保護，這可能會發生……pic.twitter.com/ft4knwptoq

— Pop Punk (@PopPunkOnChain) April 16, 2025

- 流行朋克（@poppunkonchain）2025年4月16日

The Controversy

爭議

Not long after the token's launch, critics slammed Base for what they saw as a reckless move. Former Vice President of Research of Riot Platforms, Pierre Rochard, called it "terrible for the industry".

令牌發布後不久，批評家抨擊了他們認為魯ck的舉動。 RIOT平台研究的前副總裁Pierre Rochard稱其為“對行業的可怕”。

On-chain analyst Hantao Yuan revealed that just three wallets controlled nearly 47% of the total supply, with one wallet alone holding 25.6%.

鍊鍊分析師漢托·元（Hantao Yuan）透露，只有三個錢包控制了總供應量的近47％，僅一個錢包佔25.6％。

Let me get this straight> base tweets a token on their main account> Top 3 holders had 47% of the supply (sold a lot)> Jesse defends it> Posts 2 more tokens> "This is culture"

讓我直截了當>基本推文在其主要帳戶上的代幣>前三名持有人擁有47％的供應量（賣出很多）>傑西（Jesse

Rugs 2500 holders (potentially new base users)

地毯2500個持有人（可能是新的基本用戶）

This is a joke, right?

這是個玩笑，對吧？

Don’t do this if you’re reading this. It’s terrible for the industry. We need to build things people want to use, not pyramid schemes.

如果您正在閱讀本文，請不要這樣做。這對行業來說是可怕的。我們需要建立人們想要使用的東西，而不是金字塔方案。

On-chain analyst reveals that three wallets controlled nearly 47% of the total supply, with one wallet alone holding 25.6% of the “Base is for everyone” token.

鏈上分析師透露，三個錢包控制了總供應量的近47％，僅一個錢包就容納了25.6％的“基礎是每個人”的代幣。

Volume bots were also used to amplify the

體積機器人也用於擴增