Hyperliquid 因其治理和安全性面臨批評，承諾與其他驗證者共享質押代幣

Hyperliquid 是一個永續期貨交易平台，其治理和安全性正面臨批評。該公司已對擔憂做出回應。

Hyperliquid, a platform for trading perpetual futures, has come under fire for its governance and security practices. Specifically, concerns have been raised about the selection process for network validators and the level of decentralization within the system. Validators are responsible for verifying and securing transactions on the platform.

Hyperliquid 是一個永續期貨交易平台，因其治理和安全實踐而受到批評。具體來說，人們對網路驗證者的選擇過程和系統內的去中心化程度提出了擔憂。驗證者負責驗證和保護平台上的交易。

The issue came to light on January 7 when Kam Benbrik, an employee of the node operator Chorus One, took to social media to highlight problems with Hyperliquid. Among his criticisms was the allegation that new validators were being permitted to “buy their seats.” According to Benbrik, validators should be chosen based on their technical abilities, rather than their capacity to pay for a position.

這個問題於 1 月 7 日曝光，當時節點運營商 Chorus One 的員工 Kam Benbrik 在社交媒體上強調了 Hyperliquid 的問題。他的批評之一是指控新的驗證者被允許「購買席位」。 Benbrik 認為，驗證者的選擇應該基於他們的技術能力，而不是他們支付職位費用的能力。

In response to these claims, Hyperliquid issued a statement on January 8, refuting the allegations. The platform stated that all validators were selected based on their performance during a testing phase, known as a testnet, and that there was no mechanism for purchasing a validator position.

針對這些說法，Hyperliquid 於 1 月 8 日發表聲明，駁斥了這些指控。該平台表示，所有驗證者都是根據測試階段（稱為測試網）的表現來選擇的，並且沒有購買驗證者職位的機制。

Moreover, the platform noted that it would be adding more validators over time as the blockchain scaled up, which is a common practice among most blockchain systems. This explanation appeared to alleviate some market concerns, with the price of HYPE, Hyperliquid’s native token, briefly rebounding from $20.81 on January 7 to nearly $24 before settling at $23.

此外，該平台指出，隨著區塊鏈規模的擴大，它將隨著時間的推移添加更多驗證器，這是大多數區塊鏈系統中的常見做法。這一解釋似乎緩解了一些市場擔憂，Hyperliquid 的原生代幣 HYPE 的價格從 1 月 7 日的 20.81 美元短暫反彈至近 24 美元，然後穩定在 23 美元。

Earlier criticisms of Hyperliquid’s decentralization surfaced in December, when reports emerged that hackers from North Korea were probing Hyperliquid’s defenses. At the time, Hyperliquid had only four validators, raising concerns that if hackers managed to compromise three of them, they could take over the network.

早前對 Hyperliquid 去中心化的批評在去年 12 月就已浮出水面，當時有報道稱，來自北韓的駭客正在探測 Hyperliquid 的防禦措施。當時，Hyperliquid 只有四個驗證器，這引發了人們的擔憂，如果駭客設法破壞其中三個驗證器，他們就可以接管網路。

Since then, Hyperliquid has increased the number of validators to 16; however, critics maintain that the system remains overly centralized. Five validators controlled by the Hyper Foundation hold over 81% of the staked tokens, implying that a single entity could halt the system by controlling one-third of the stake and take over the entire platform by controlling two-thirds.

此後，Hyperliquid 將驗證人數量增加至 16 個；然而，批評者認為該系統仍然過於集中。 Hyper 基金會控制的五個驗證者持有超過 81% 的質押代幣，這意味著單一實體可以透過控制三分之一的質押來停止系統，並透過控制三分之二來接管整個平台。

To mitigate this potential vulnerability, Hyperliquid has announced a program to share some of its staked tokens with other validators in an effort to enhance decentralization.

為了緩解這一潛在漏洞，Hyperliquid 宣布了一項計劃，與其他驗證者分享其部分質押代幣，以增強去中心化。

Another point of contention relates to the closed-source nature of the code used by Hyperliquid’s validators. As a result, people are unable to view or examine how the system functions. According to some validators, this has led to them being penalized unfairly because they did not fully understand the system.

另一個爭論點與 Hyperliquid 驗證器所使用的程式碼的封閉來源性質有關。結果，人們無法查看或檢查系統如何運作。一些驗證者表示，這導致他們受到不公平的懲罰，因為他們沒有完全理解這個系統。

Hyperliquid has acknowledged that its code is not yet publicly available but stated that it will be released once it is more secure and stable. Opening up the code would allow users to inspect and verify the system, which is a common practice in building trust in a platform.

Hyperliquid 承認其程式碼尚未公開，但表示一旦更安全和穩定就會發布。開放代碼將允許用戶檢查和驗證系統，這是在平台中建立信任的常見做法。