美國加密貨幣大鏡頭呼籲採取更多針對性的立法，以阻止未來對行業的監管攻擊

意見：美國加密貨幣大鏡頭呼籲採取更多針對性的立法，以阻止未來對該行業的監管攻擊。唐納德·特朗普總統的執行命令

The US crypto big shots are calling for more targeted legislation to block future regulatory attacks on the industry. While President Donald Trump’s Executive Orders have facilitated the industry’s release from years of militant regulation, industry experts think these efforts may not stand the test of time if proper legislation is not passed to consolidate them.

美國加密貨幣大鏡頭呼籲採取更多針對性的立法，以阻止未來對行業的監管攻擊。儘管唐納德·特朗普總統的執行命令促進了該行業從多年激進法規中釋放出來，但行業專家認為，如果未通過適當的立法來鞏固這些努力，這些努力可能不會經受時間的考驗。

Trump Can Not Directly Authorize Crypto Purchase

特朗普無法直接授權加密購買

With the several audacious EOs that have been issued by President Trump, it might be natural to conclude that he has the authority to order the purchase of Bitcoin and other crypto assets. However, crypto lawyer John Deaton bursts that bubble and makes it clear that such expectations are far-fetched.

由於特朗普總統發行的幾個大膽的EO，很自然地得出結論，他有權下令購買比特幣和其他加密資產。但是，加密律師約翰·迪頓（John Deaton）爆發了這種泡沫，並清楚地表明，這種期望是遙不可及的。

“I’m a bit surprised at how many people think the President can authorize the purchases of BTC or any other crypto,” said Deaton.

Deaton說：“我對有多少人認為總統可以授權購買BTC或任何其他加密貨幣感到有些驚訝。”

He believes that Trump can issue an EO for agencies to remit any seized crypto to the Treasury to be reserved for the next 20 years, which a new President could revoke in the next four years and have all the crypto sold.

他認為，特朗普可以向機構簽發EO，以將任何被扣押的加密貨幣匯給未來20年的財政部，這是新任總統可以在未來四年內撤銷的，並將所有加密貨幣賣出。

“But for a direct purchase of BTC, XRP, or any other token, congressional approval is required,” said Deaton.

Deaton說：“但是要直接購買BTC，XRP或任何其他代幣，需要獲得國會批准。”

The legal expert does not see any path toward a consensus to purchase crypto with public funds anytime soon, considering that Senator Lummis’ Bitcoin Bill is not close to passing as she admitted.

考慮到參議員盧米斯（Lummis）的比特幣法案並不接近通過，法律專家沒有看到任何公共資金購買加密貨幣的道路。

The President could also deploy his national security or emergency powers if he chooses to do so. He could justify an emergency Bitcoin purchase as a matter of national security under the Defense Production Act or he could go through the ESF (Exchange Stabilization Fund), which allows the Treasury’s purchase of foreign currencies and assets to bolster US dollar stability.

如果總統選擇這樣做，他還可以部署其國家安全或緊急權力。根據《國防生產法》，他可以根據國家安全的急需比特幣合理，或者他可以通過ESF（交易穩定基金），這允許國庫購買外幣和資產以增強美元穩定性。

That said, Deaton notes that all these approaches “would be immediately challenged in court.” Instead of gunning for the Crypto Reserve, which he said “is not happening anytime soon,” he proposes meaningful reform and legislation covering stablecoins, market structure, centralized exchange oversight, tax, and Accredited Investor Rule reforms.

也就是說，Deaton指出，所有這些方法都“將立即在法庭上受到質疑”。他沒有為加密保護區（Crypto Reserve）持續槍擊，他說“不會很快發生”，他提出有意義的改革和立法，涵蓋了穩定的股份，市場結構，集中式交流監督，稅收和認可的投資者規則改革。

Legislation Will Block Potential Regulatory Tyranny Toward The Crypto Industry

立法將阻止潛在的監管暴政對加密工業

Gemini Co-founder Cameron Winklevoss has called for a no-trust approach towards regulators to prevent any potential loophole that could lead to the type of crackdown the crypto space witnessed under Gary Gensler and his infamous alliance with anti-crypto Senator Elizabeth Warren.

雙子座的聯合創始人卡梅隆·溫克爾沃斯（Cameron Winklevoss）呼籲採取一種不信任的方法，以防止任何潛在的漏洞，這可能導致加里·貢斯勒（Gary Gensler）在加里·貢斯勒（Gary Gensler）和他與反克里普托參議員伊麗莎白·沃倫（Elizabeth Warren）臭名昭著的聯盟下見證的加密空間。

“Any future crypto legislation must make it very hard to weaponize federal agencies against crypto. We need a firewall against federal regulatory attacks. This should be a major goal of any future legislation put forth.”

“任何未來的加密立法都必須使聯邦機構對加密貨幣的武器進行武器武器武器。我們需要防火牆，以防止聯邦監管襲擊。這應該是未來立法的主要目標。”

According to Winklevoss, if Warren could weaponize the SEC to attack crypto with enforcement actions, then “we should assume” that she will also try to infiltrate other agencies like the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) to vest her malicious regulatory intent on crypto.

根據Winklevoss的說法，如果沃倫（Warren）可以通過執法行動進行武器攻擊加密貨幣，那麼“我們應該假設”她還將試圖滲透到其他機構（例如CFTC（商品期貨交易委員會）），以使其惡意的監管意圖在Crypto上。

“Warren gave us an invaluable lesson in the abuse of power and tyranny that we must never forget.”

“沃倫（Warren）在濫用權力和暴政方面給了我們一個寶貴的教訓，我們絕對永遠不會忘記。”

In conclusion, he urges the industry to operate with a “zero trust model” and tighten up legislation, assuming that agencies are already “infiltrated with Warrenites” and will be weaponized against the industry in the future.

總之，他敦促該行業以“零信託模式”運營並加強立法，假設代理商已經“滲透到勇士蘭特”，將來將對該行業進行武器。