|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
這些評論是加密貨幣對 SEC 日益嚴峻的法律挑戰的一部分,SEC 上個月在 Crypto.com 的訴訟中受到打擊。
SEC Commissioner Mark Uyeda has slammed the agency’s handling of the crypto industry, calling it a “debacle” and a “disaster.”
美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 專員馬克烏耶達 (Mark Uyeda) 猛烈抨擊了該機構對加密貨幣行業的處理方式,稱其為「崩潰」和「災難」。
His comments come as part of crypto’s growing legal challenge to the SEC, which last month faced a blow in a lawsuit from Crypto.com.
他的言論是加密貨幣對 SEC 日益嚴峻的法律挑戰的一部分,SEC 上個月在 Crypto.com 的訴訟中受到了打擊。
With frustration growing among parts of the industry over the SEC’s reliance on enforcement actions that provide little or no regulatory guidance for the industry, Uyeda’s remarks offer an example of that ill feeling.
由於美國證券交易委員會依賴執法行動,而這些執法行動很少或根本沒有為該行業提供監管指導,因此該行業的部分人士越來越感到沮喪,上田的言論就是這種不滿情緒的一個例子。
Crypto.com Sues SEC Over Regulatory Overreach
Crypto.com 因監管越權起訴 SEC
Recently, Crypto.com filed a lawsuit against the SEC, accusing the agency of overreach. The situation occurred after Crypto.com allegedly violated securities laws by functioning as an unregistered broker-dealer, and the SEC followed up with a Wells notice. Crypto.com stated that the SEC should clearly provide regulatory guidance, which is why it seeks to enforce the rules through legal action.
最近,Crypto.com 對 SEC 提起訴訟,指責該機構越權。在發生這種情況之前,Crypto.com 涉嫌充當未註冊的經紀交易商,違反了證券法,美國證券交易委員會隨後發出了 Wells 通知。 Crypto.com 表示,SEC 應該明確提供監管指導,這就是為什麼它尋求透過法律行動來執行規則。
Crypto.com’s lawsuit is just one of many legal battles the crypto industry has faced with the SEC. It comes after the agency lost a high-profile case against Ripple Labs regarding XRP tokens and drew conflicting court rulings. Some of these cases have been stalled, but the SEC hasn’t given up on appeals, and the cases still throw the crypto world into legal uncertainty.
Crypto.com 的訴訟只是加密產業與 SEC 面臨的眾多法律糾紛之一。此前,該機構在針對 Ripple Labs 的有關 XRP 代幣的一場備受矚目的訴訟中敗訴,並引發了相互矛盾的法院裁決。其中一些案件已經陷入僵局,但 SEC 並沒有放棄上訴,這些案件仍然讓加密世界陷入法律不確定性。
SEC’s Regulatory Approach Leaves Firms Uncertain
SEC 的監管方式讓企業充滿不確定性
According to Uyeda, the SEC mainly regulates crypto through enforcement. He said that companies have been guessing how to follow existing securities laws without clear rules. However, the courts, not the SEC, have drawn the lines in the legal sand, leading to uneven rulings.
Uyeda 表示,SEC 主要透過執法來監管加密貨幣。他表示,企業一直在猜測如何在沒有明確規則的情況下遵守現有的證券法。然而,是法院,而不是美國證券交易委員會,在法律上劃定了界限,導致了不平衡的裁決。
In addition, the SEC’s enforcement actions have brought more confusion than clarity, leaving tens of millions of firms unsure precisely how to stand legally. This strategy has created a fractured regulatory environment, as different courts have determined contradictory decisions.
此外,美國證券交易委員會的執法行動帶來的混亂多於清晰度,讓數以千萬計的公司不確定如何合法地站穩腳跟。這項策略造成了一個支離破碎的監管環境,因為不同的法院做出了相互矛盾的裁決。
Uyeda’s comments highlight the growing divide between the SEC and the industry it seeks to regulate, with both sides expressing frustration over the current state of affairs.
上田的言論突顯了美國證券交易委員會與其尋求監管的行業之間日益擴大的分歧,雙方都對目前的事態表示沮喪。
Uyeda Criticizes SEC Focus on ESG Mandates
Uyeda 批評 SEC 關注 ESG 指令
Uyeda also criticized the SEC’s handling of cryptocurrency regulation and the agency’s focus on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) mandates. These efforts, he said, usually veer away from the SEC’s core financial oversight responsibilities. Uyeda said financial regulators should focus on making markets transparent and fair instead of imposing social or environmental goals.
Uyeda 也批評了 SEC 對加密貨幣監管的處理方式以及該機構對環境、社會和治理 (ESG) 指令的關注。他說,這些努力通常偏離了 SEC 的核心財務監督職責。烏耶達表示,金融監管機構應專注於使市場透明和公平,而不是強加社會或環境目標。
Uyeda believes that this broader criticism reflects his view that the SEC should stay within its primary job of financial regulation and not overreach.
烏耶達認為,這種更廣泛的批評反映了他的觀點,即美國證券交易委員會應該繼續履行其金融監管的主要職責,而不是越權。
The agency’s emphasis on issues other than finances, he said, could divert attention from its core responsibilities. His position on ESG issues indicates Uyeda is worried the SEC may stray beyond its boundaries as a traditional regulator.
他說,該機構對財務以外問題的重視可能會轉移對其核心職責的注意力。他在 ESG 問題上的立場表明 Uyeda 擔心 SEC 可能會超出其作為傳統監管機構的界限。
Uyeda’s comments emphasize an even more pressing issue: regulatory guidance for cryptocurrencies. He said that the SEC still needs to provide interpretive guidance explaining what companies are allowed and not allowed to do. The lack of clarity has meant crypto firms are at legal risk and don’t know if they follow federal security laws.
烏耶達的評論強調了一個更緊迫的問題:加密貨幣的監管指導。他表示,美國證券交易委員會仍需要提供解釋性指導,解釋公司允許做什麼和不允許做什麼。缺乏明確性意味著加密貨幣公司面臨法律風險,並且不知道他們是否遵守聯邦安全法。
免責聲明:info@kdj.com
所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!
如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。
-
- Plus 錢包:安全和獎勵的最佳選擇
- 2024-10-12 04:25:25
- 長期以來,Exodus錢包一直是比特幣錢包的首選,以其可靠的安全性和用戶友好的操作而聞名。
-
- 如果你找的一枚罕見的 50 便士硬幣上有這個特定的草圖短語,它的價值可能會增加二十倍
- 2024-10-12 04:25:02
- 這件珍貴的作品於 2020 年發布,以紀念英國退出歐盟。
-
- 跟隨鯨魚:ZDEX 和另外 4 種山寨幣正在以創紀錄的數量積累
- 2024-10-12 04:25:02
- 大型投資者正以前所未有的速度悄悄增持某些加密貨幣。這些重大舉措暗示了加密貨幣市場可能發生的變化。