Charles Hoskinson 認為 XRP 在懷俄明州穩定代幣（WST）計畫期間遭受重大挫折

Cardano 創辦人 Charles Hoskinson 認為，XRP 在懷俄明州穩定代幣（WST）計畫期間遭受了重大挫折。

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has slammed the Wyoming Stable Token (WST) project, arguing that XRP suffered a major setback during the initiative.

Cardano 創始人 Charles Hoskinson 猛烈抨擊了懷俄明州穩定代幣（WST）項目，認為 XRP 在該計劃期間遭受了重大挫折。

Over the past few weeks, Hoskinson has been actively criticizing the process of selecting blockchains for the WST project. He has maintained that the selection was unfair and biased, ultimately sidelining Cardano and other significant projects.

在過去的幾周里，Hoskinson 一直在積極批評為 WST 專案選擇區塊鏈的過程。他堅稱這個選擇是不公平且有偏見的，最終導致卡爾達諾和其他重要項目被邊緣化。

While Ripple recently managed to secure approval for its RLUSD stablecoin from the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS), Hoskinson believes that the XRP Ledger (XRPL) lost a crucial opportunity to expand its liquidity and visibility.

儘管 Ripple 最近成功獲得了紐約金融服務部 (NYDFS) 對其 RLUSD 穩定幣的批准，但 Hoskinson 認為 XRP Ledger (XRPL) 失去了擴大其流動性和知名度的關鍵機會。

Examining XRP’s Liquidity Impact

檢查 XRP 的流動性影響

Hoskinson insists that the WST project could have played a pivotal role in boosting liquidity for the XRPL.

Hoskinson 堅稱，WST 計畫本可以在提高 XRPL 流動性方面發揮關鍵作用。

He explains that Ripple’s RLUSD system was designed to compete directly with solutions offered by Circle. However, the WST initiative opted to integrate Circle’s project rather than utilizing Ripple’s infrastructure.

他解釋說，Ripple 的 RLUSD 系統旨在與 Circle 提供的解決方案直接競爭。然而，WST 計劃選擇整合 Circle 的項目，而不是利用 Ripple 的基礎設施。

According to Hoskinson, if Ripple had been included in the process, Wyoming could have issued tokens valued in the millions using the RLUSD infrastructure. This would have integrated XRP into major exchanges, providing a benefit that Ripple ultimately missed out on.

Hoskinson 表示，如果 Ripple 參與這一過程，懷俄明州可能會使用 RLUSD 基礎設施發行價值數百萬美元的代幣。這將使 XRP 整合到主要交易所中，從而提供 Ripple 最終錯過的好處。

Allegations of a Conspiracy in the Selection Process

甄選過程中存在陰謀的指控

Hoskinson has levied accusations that powerful organizations such as Consensys, Circle, and BlackRock worked together to influence the selection of blockchains for the WST project.

Hoskinson 指控 Consensys、Circle 和 BlackRock 等強大組織共同影響 WST 專案區塊鏈的選擇。

He claims that individuals with connections to these groups held key positions on the commission responsible for making the decision. As a result, he alleges that the commission was biased in favor of Ethereum-based solutions.

他聲稱與這些團體有聯繫的個人在負責做出決定的委員會中擔任關鍵職位。因此，他聲稱該委員會偏向於基於以太坊的解決方案。

Hoskinson has repeatedly highlighted the fact that Cardano, XRP, and Bitcoin were unfairly excluded from the project due to this alleged collaboration.

霍斯金森一再強調，由於這種所謂的合作，卡爾達諾、瑞波幣和比特幣被不公平地排除在這個計畫之外。

Tracking the Abandonment of the WST Multichain Vision

追蹤 WST 多鏈願景的放棄

Initially, the WST project was intended to support multiple blockchains.

最初，WST 專案旨在支援多個區塊鏈。

Hoskinson maintains that this vision was altered when Anthony Apollo, the executive director of the WST commission, became involved. Apollo, who has a background with Consensys, allegedly shifted the project’s focus toward Ethereum.

霍斯金森堅持認為，當 WST 委員會執行董事安東尼·阿波羅介入後，這一願景發生了變化。據稱，阿波羅擁有 Consensys 的背景，他將該專案的重點轉向了以太坊。

As a consequence, the initial plan to evaluate prototypes for various blockchains was abandoned in favor of a closed and exclusionary process.

因此，評估各種區塊鏈原型的最初計劃被放棄，轉而採用封閉和排他性的流程。

Also Read: Stellar vs XRP: A Deep Dive into the Key Differences

另請閱讀：Stellar 與 XRP：深入探討主要差異

Stellar vs. XRPL: A Contentious Choice

Stellar 與 XRPL：一個有爭議的選擇

The decision to integrate Stellar into the WST project over the XRPL has sparked significant debate.

透過 XRPL 將 Stellar 整合到 WST 專案的決定引發了激烈的爭論。

Hoskinson draws attention to the vast disparities between the two projects. The XRPL boasts a market capitalization of $140 billion and daily trading volumes in the tens of billions. In contrast, Stellar has a market cap of $13 billion and daily trading volume of only $1 billion.

霍斯金森提請人們注意這兩個項目之間的巨大差異。 XRPL 市值達 1,400 億美元，每日交易量達數百億。相比之下，Stellar 的市值為 130 億美元，每日交易量僅為 10 億美元。

Despite these differences, Stellar was ultimately selected. Hoskinson questions how Stellar could have outperformed Ripple’s technology based on the scoring criteria, and he describes the decision as inconsistent.

儘管存在這些差異，Stellar 最終還是被選中。 Hoskinson 質疑 Stellar 如何根據評分標準超越 Ripple 的技術，他認為這一決定不一致。

Hoskinson Persists in Criticizing the Wyoming Stablecoin Initiative

霍斯金森堅持批評懷俄明州穩定幣計劃

Throughout his interactions with the community, Hoskinson has not shied away from expressing his dissatisfaction with the selection process for the WST project.

在與社區的互動中，Hoskinson 毫不掩飾地表達了他對 WST 計畫選擇過程的不滿。

He maintains that the exclusion of Cardano, XRP, and Bitcoin from the project highlights a lack of fairness in the adoption of blockchain technology. He believes that this has broader implications for the crypto ecosystem, as it stifles innovation and competition.

他認為，將卡爾達諾、XRP 和比特幣排除在該專案之外凸顯了區塊鏈技術採用中缺乏公平性。他認為這對加密生態系統有更廣泛的影響，因為它抑制了創新和競爭。

By raising these concerns, Hoskinson aims to promote transparency and inclusivity in future blockchain initiatives.

透過提出這些擔憂，霍斯金森旨在促進未來區塊鏈計畫的透明度和包容性。

Highlighting Ripple’s Success with RLUSD: A Missed Opportunity

強調 Ripple 透過 RLUSD 取得的成功：錯失的機會

While Ripple certainly achieved a milestone with the NYDFS approval for its RLUSD stablecoin, Hoskinson argues that this success cannot fully compensate for the missed opportunity in Wyoming.

雖然 Ripple 憑藉 NYDFS 批准其 RLUSD 穩定幣無疑實現了里程碑，但 Hoskinson 認為這一成功並不能完全彌補懷俄明州錯失的機會。

He emphasizes that the WST project could have showcased Ripple’s capabilities on a much grander scale. Instead, the biased selection process left Ripple on the sidelines.

他強調，WST 專案本來可以在更大範圍內展示 Ripple 的能力。相反，帶有偏見的選擇過程讓瑞波幣處於觀望狀態。

Hoskinson suggests that Ripple’s RLUSD infrastructure was uniquely suited to meet the needs of the WST project. However, this potential remained unrealized.

Hoskinson 認為 Ripple 的 RLUSD 基礎設施非常適合滿足 WST 專案的需求。然而，這項潛力仍未實現。