伯威克·勞（Burwick Law）是麥克斯·伯威克（Max Burwick）的伯維克·勞（Burwick Law）的創始人兼創始人，很可能在正在進行的泵趣味訴訟的中心推出了Dogshit2

加密影響者Wirelyss的研究表明，DogShit2（Bigbl”推出的帳戶與Degods NFT的購買者（“ Y00T＃6430”）共享了同樣的加密透碼地址。

The Managing Partner and Founder of Burwick Law, Max Burwick, is likely to have launched DOGSHIT2, the token at the centre of an ongoing Pump Fun lawsuit, despite claiming his firm had nothing to do with it.

Burwick Law的執行合夥人兼創始人Max Burwick可能會推出Dogshit2，即持續的泵趣味訴訟中心的代幣，儘管聲稱他的公司與此無關。

Research from crypto influencer Wirelyss shows that the account behind the launch of DOGSHIT2, 'Bigbl,' shares the same crypto address with the purchaser of the DeGods NFT, 'y00t #6430'.

加密影響者Wirelyss的研究表明，DogShit2（Bigbl）的推出背後的帳戶與Degods NFT的購買者“ Y00T＃6430”共享了相同的加密地址。

An associate of Burwick, @brandon_galang, met up with Burwick in 2023 for some 'degen yoga'. Galang shared a picture of three individuals with NFT pictures covering their faces and tagged Burwick and '@dgoldzz'.

@brandon_galang的Burwick合夥人在2023年與Burwick見面，以“ Degen Yoga”。 Galang分享了一張三個人的照片，其中包括NFT圖片覆蓋他們的臉，並標記為Burwick和“ @dgoldzz”。

The NFT on the far left is the y00t #6430 NFT linked to the Bigbl Pump Fun account.

最左邊的NFT是Y00T＃6430 NFT，鏈接到Bigbl Pump Fun帳戶。

The person behind this y00t NFT has a tattoo on his left arm that closely resembles the end of the tattoo on Burwick’s left arm. Another post from a Solana artist followed by Burwick claims that Burwick is 'a y00t'.

這個Y00T NFT背後的人的左臂上有一個紋身，與Burwick左臂上的紋身末端非常相似。 Solana藝術家的另一篇文章隨後Burwick聲稱Burwick是“ Y00T”。

Burwick Law denies launching Dogshit2 onchain

Burwick Law否認推出Dogshit2 OnChain

The DOGSHIT2 token appeared in Burwick Law’s lawsuit against Pump Fun in a series of screenshots detailing its step-by-step launch process. Pump Fun allegedly offered and sold unregistered securities while omitting 'basic investor protections'.

DogShit2代幣出現在Burwick Law針對Pump Fun的訴訟中，其中一系列屏幕截圖詳細介紹了其逐步發布過程。據稱，Pump Fun提供並出售了未註冊的證券，同時省略了“基本投資者保護”。

Burwick Law claims it has 'no affiliation, endorsement, or ownership interest in the DOGSHIT2 token or any related assets. Simply put, our firms have not launched any memecoins onchain'.

Burwick Law聲稱，它沒有“ dogshit2代幣或任何相關資產的隸屬關係，認可或所有權”。簡而言之，我們的公司尚未推出任何Memecoins OnChain'。

Legal intern Dancing Eddie asked Burwick who created the token, and he said, 'Why would it matter?' while refusing to comment further.

埃迪（Eddie）的法律實習生問伯威克（Burwick）是誰創建了代幣，他說：“為什麼要重要？”同時拒絕進一步評論。

Wirelyss has previously criticized Burwick Law for denying it launched the token 'on-chain'.

Wirelyss此前曾批評Burwick Law否認它推出了代幣的“鏈”。

Wirelyss claims the firm launched the token 'off-chain' instead and is trying to shift launch accountability from itself and onto the token’s first buyer.

Wirelyss聲稱該公司推出了代幣的“脫鏈”，並試圖將啟動問責制從本身轉移到代幣的第一個買家。

Indeed, Pump Fun notes that DOGSHIT2 'was created offchain, which means that the CA deployer may appear different to the actual coin creator'.

確實，泵趣味指出，dogshit2'是從鏈上創建的，這意味著CA部署可能與實際的硬幣創建者不同。

SEC says memecoin aren’t securities

SEC說Memecoin不是證券

Burwick Law says Pump Fun has the technical capability to take down DOGSHIT2, but is choosing not to 'despite the clear financial and legal risks posed to the public'.

Burwick Law說，Pump Fun具有拆除DogShit2的技術能力，但選擇“儘管對公眾有明顯的財務和法律風險”而選擇不選擇“不構成公眾”。

The lawsuit against Pump Fun may also be hampered by the latest Securities and Exchange Commission statement on memecoins. It claims memecoins 'do not involve the offer and sale of securities under the federal securities laws'.

對泵趣味的訴訟也可能受到Memecoins最新證券交易委員會聲明的阻礙。它聲稱Memecoins的“不涉及根據聯邦證券法的要約和出售證券”。

'As such, persons who participate in the offer and sale of memecoins do not need to register their transactions with the Commission under the Securities Act of 1933 or fall within one of the Securities Act’s exemptions from registration.'

“因此，參加和銷售Memecoins的人無需根據1933年的《證券法》或《證券法案的豁免之一》的一項登記，在委員會中註冊其交易。”

Protos has reached out to Burwick Law and Wirelyss for comment.

Protos已與Burwick Law和Wirelyss接觸。