Blast Network 面臨挑戰，TVL 暴跌 62%，每日活躍用戶跌至六個月低點

最近，Blast Network 面臨重大挑戰，TVL 較高峰暴跌 62%，令人震驚

Blast Network has faced several challenges recently, including a 62% drop in TVL from its peak and a loss of $300 million in liquidity. The network’s TVL dropped to $785 million by August 5, its lowest in six months.

Blast Network 最近面臨多項挑戰，包括 TVL 較高峰下降 62%，以及流動性損失 3 億美元。截至 8 月 5 日，該網路的 TVL 降至 7.85 億美元，為六個月以來的最低水準。

Despite recovering over $100 million in TVL, Blast still remains down over 60% from its record high of $2.3 billion in early June.

儘管 TVL 已恢復超過 1 億美元，但 Blast 仍比 6 月初 23 億美元的歷史高點下降了 60% 以上。

The challenges are also highlighted by a decline in daily active users, which fell to 27,800 by August 18, the lowest since Blast began its expansion in late February.

日活躍用戶數量的下降也凸顯了這些挑戰，截至 8 月 18 日，每日活躍用戶數量降至 27,800 人，這是自 2 月底 Blast 開始擴張以來的最低水平。

This contrasts with rivals Base and Arbitrum, which have 740,000 and 360,000 daily active wallets, respectively. In mid-June, Blast-based dapps saw more than 180,000 daily wallet users.

這與競爭對手 Base 和 Arbitrum 形成鮮明對比，後者分別擁有 740,000 個和 360,000 個每日活躍錢包。 6 月中旬，基於 Blast 的 dapp 每日錢包用戶超過 18 萬。

The decline follows a problematic airdrop in June and growing dissatisfaction among users and developers. Initiatives like Pacmoon are exploring other options.

這一下降是在 6 月出現問題的空投以及用戶和開發者日益增長的不滿之後發生的。 Pacmoon 等項目正在探索其他選擇。

Pacmoon’s Lamboland has criticized Blast, saying, “Blast failed to address these crucial aspects and built a system that focused on token creation without providing necessary social support.”

Pacmoon 的 Lamboland 批評了 Blast，稱“Blast 未能解決這些關鍵問題，並建立了一個專注於代幣創建的系統，而沒有提供必要的社會支持。”

The network has also been criticized for its launch strategy, especially regarding the bridge feature that prevented users from accessing their funds for an extended time.

該網路也因其啟動策略而受到批評，尤其是阻止用戶長時間存取其資金的橋接功能。

This situation has only intensified the mounting frustration felt by both the community and developers.

這種情況只會加劇社區和開發人員日益增加的挫折感。

The dramatic decline of Blast’s key metrics demonstrates that decentralized finance (DeFi) projects and public decentralized networks should pay more attention to securing organic growth and focusing on their communities and use cases.

Blast 關鍵指標的急劇下降表明，去中心化金融（DeFi）計畫和公共去中心化網路應該更加關注確保有機成長並關注其社群和用例。

The ecosystem experienced a swift expansion fueled by the eagerly awaited airdrop. Yet, when the giveaway kicked off in June, responses varied, as numerous users expressed dissatisfaction with the token-claiming procedure and how the tokens were distributed.

在期待已久的空投的推動下，生態系統經歷了迅速擴張。然而，當贈品活動於 6 月開始時，反應各不相同，因為許多用戶對代幣領取程序和代幣分配方式表示不滿。

Not only were airdrop participants unhappy with the network’s approach, but some projects building on Blast were also frustrated. For instance, Pacmoon, previously the leading meme coin on layer 2, is making the move to Solana.

空投參與者不僅對該網路的做法不滿意，而且一些基於 Blast 的專案也感到沮喪。例如，Pacmoon，以前是第 2 層領先的 meme 幣，現在正在遷移到 Solana。

According to Pacmoon’s Lamboland on X, “We think that tokens, community, and culture are what make a blockchain successful. However, Blast never focused on that. They created a system where native tokens on Blast are actively disincentivized and they provided zero social support.”

根據 Pacmoon 的 Lamboland 在 X 上的說法，「我們認為代幣、社群和文化是區塊鏈成功的因素。然而，Blast 從未關注過這一點。他們創建了一個系統，其中 Blast 上的原生代幣被積極抑制，並且他們提供了零社會支持。