基地會自動創建一個ERC-20令牌，導致立即，野生價格波動

基礎團隊最近在Zora上的測試文章會自動創建一個ERC-20代幣，從而立即進行野生價格波動。

A recent test post by the Base team on Zora has generated an ERC-20 token, which is quickly being sold on Uniswap for huge gains and losses.

基礎團隊在Zora上最近的測試帖子產生了ERC-20令牌，該令牌很快在Uniswap上出售，以獲得巨大的收益和損失。

The event has raised questions about onchain content value and how users see these new "content coins."

該活動提出了有關Onchain內容價值以及用戶如何看到這些新“內容硬幣”的問題。

The token saw huge gains and losses within hours, sparking debate about market speculation, bots, and the need for clearer standards.

代幣在數小時內看到了巨大的損失，引發了有關市場投機，機器人以及對更清晰標準的需求的辯論。

Base is posting on Zora because we believe everyone should bring their content onchain, and use the tools that make it possible.Memes. Moments. Culture.If we want the future to be onchain, we have to be willing to experiment in public. That’s what we’re doing.To be clear, we are not selling any tokens. These are not official Base or Coinbase tokens.

Base發佈在Zora上，因為我們相信每個人都應該將其內容on Chain帶來，並使用使其成為可能的工具。時刻。文化。如果我們希望未來成為鏈，我們必須願意在公開場合進行試驗。這就是我們正在做的事情。要清楚，我們沒有出售任何令牌。這些不是官方的基礎或共同的代幣。

To clarify, posting on Zora generates an ERC-20 token, part of Zora’s way to tokenize content. Following Zora’s standard process, Base received 10 million tokens (1% of the total supply) for the post.

為了澄清，在Zora上發布ZORA的ERC-20令牌是Zora代表內容的方式的一部分。在Zora的標準過程之後，Base獲得了該職位的1000萬個令牌（佔總供應總額的1％）。

The token appeared on Uniswap, where trading volume quickly surged past $13 million.

代幣出現在Uniswap上，交易量迅速飆升了1300萬美元。

After about four hours, the token experienced a sharp price spike, which was immediately followed by an equally sharp crash that drained liquidity and saw the token lose over 99% of its value. It has since seen a minor bounce.

大約四個小時後，代幣經歷了尖銳的價格飆升，緊接著發生了同樣急劇的崩潰，耗盡了流動性，並看到代幣損失了其價值的99％以上。從那以後，它看到了輕微的彈跳。

Those who bought the token early and sold at the height of the surge experienced massive gains, while those who entered later faced significant losses as the token plummeted.

那些早早購買了代幣並在激增的高峰期賣出的人經歷了巨大的收益，而後來進入代幣的人則面臨巨大的損失。

The rapid price action and large volume trades fueled speculation about market manipulation, with some users suspecting a "pump and dump" scheme.

快速的價格行動和大量批量交易的猜測是關於市場操縱的猜測，一些用戶懷疑“泵和轉儲”計劃。

Let me get this straight> base tweets a token on their main account> Top 3 holders had 47% of the supply (sold a lot)> Jesse defends it> Posts 2 more tokens> "This is culture" > Rugs 2500 holders (potentially new base users) https://t.co/95o03E9K9v

讓我直截了當>基本推文在他們的主帳戶上的代幣>前三名持有人的供應量的47％（賣了很多）> Jesse辯護>>“這就是文化”>“這就是文化”> Rugs 2500個持有人（可能是新的基本用戶）

A Base representative confirmed that the token wasn't official, directing users to a disclaimer on the Zora page.

一位基本代表確認，令牌不是官方的，將用戶指示ZORA頁面上的免責聲明。

The disclaimer stated that the token was "not an official ... token for Base, Coinbase, or any other related product or service" and was intended "solely for artistic and cultural purposes."

免責聲明說，令牌“不是官方的……用於基礎，共同基礎或任何其他相關產品或服務的代幣”，並且旨在“僅出於藝術和文化目的”。

These "content coins" are generated on Zora, where anyone can post content like images, videos, or articles, and the post will automatically mint an ERC-20 token.

這些“內容硬幣”是在Zora上生成的，任何人都可以在其中發布圖像，視頻或文章之類的內容，並且該帖子將自動鑄造ERC-20令牌。

The tokens are meant to be a way to collect value for creators and a standard for onchain culture.

代幣是一種收集創作者價值的一種方式，也是OnChain文化的標準。

Base founder Jesse Pollak later explained these “content coins.” He described them as directly representing the content, stating, “The coin is the content and the content is the coin.”

基礎創始人傑西·波拉克（Jesse Pollak）後來解釋了這些“內容硬幣”。他將它們描述為直接代表內容，並指出：“硬幣是內容，內容是硬幣。”

According to Pollak, market speculation is what drives the vast swings in the coin’s price, not the coin’s artistic purpose or cultural meaning.

根據Pollak的說法，市場投機是推動硬幣價格巨大波動的原因，而不是硬幣的藝術目的或文化意義。