基地会自动创建一个ERC-20令牌，导致立即，野生价格波动

基础团队最近在Zora上的测试文章会自动创建一个ERC-20代币，从而立即进行野生价格波动。

A recent test post by the Base team on Zora has generated an ERC-20 token, which is quickly being sold on Uniswap for huge gains and losses.

基础团队在Zora上最近的测试帖子产生了ERC-20令牌，该令牌很快在Uniswap上出售，以获得巨大的收益和损失。

The event has raised questions about onchain content value and how users see these new "content coins."

该活动提出了有关Onchain内容价值以及用户如何看到这些新“内容硬币”的问题。

The token saw huge gains and losses within hours, sparking debate about market speculation, bots, and the need for clearer standards.

代币在数小时内看到了巨大的损失，引发了有关市场投机，机器人以及对更清晰标准的需求的辩论。

Base is posting on Zora because we believe everyone should bring their content onchain, and use the tools that make it possible.Memes. Moments. Culture.If we want the future to be onchain, we have to be willing to experiment in public. That’s what we’re doing.To be clear, we are not selling any tokens. These are not official Base or Coinbase tokens.

Base发布在Zora上，因为我们相信每个人都应该将其内容on Chain带来，并使用使其成为可能的工具。时刻。文化。如果我们希望未来成为链，我们必须愿意在公开场合进行试验。这就是我们正在做的事情。要清楚，我们没有出售任何令牌。这些不是官方的基础或共同的代币。

To clarify, posting on Zora generates an ERC-20 token, part of Zora’s way to tokenize content. Following Zora’s standard process, Base received 10 million tokens (1% of the total supply) for the post.

为了澄清，在Zora上发布ZORA的ERC-20令牌是Zora代表内容的方式的一部分。在Zora的标准过程之后，Base获得了该职位的1000万个令牌（占总供应总额的1％）。

The token appeared on Uniswap, where trading volume quickly surged past $13 million.

代币出现在Uniswap上，交易量迅速飙升了1300万美元。

After about four hours, the token experienced a sharp price spike, which was immediately followed by an equally sharp crash that drained liquidity and saw the token lose over 99% of its value. It has since seen a minor bounce.

大约四个小时后，代币经历了尖锐的价格飙升，紧接着发生了同样急剧的崩溃，耗尽了流动性，并看到代币损失了其价值的99％以上。从那以后，它看到了轻微的弹跳。

Those who bought the token early and sold at the height of the surge experienced massive gains, while those who entered later faced significant losses as the token plummeted.

那些早早购买了代币并在激增的高峰期卖出的人经历了巨大的收益，而后来进入代币的人则面临巨大的损失。

The rapid price action and large volume trades fueled speculation about market manipulation, with some users suspecting a "pump and dump" scheme.

快速的价格行动和大量批量交易的猜测是关于市场操纵的猜测，一些用户怀疑“泵和转储”计划。

Let me get this straight> base tweets a token on their main account> Top 3 holders had 47% of the supply (sold a lot)> Jesse defends it> Posts 2 more tokens> "This is culture" > Rugs 2500 holders (potentially new base users) https://t.co/95o03E9K9v

让我直截了当>基本推文在他们的主帐户上的代币>前三名持有人的供应量的47％（卖了很多）> Jesse辩护>>“这就是文化”>“这就是文化”> Rugs 2500个持有人（可能是新的基本用户）

A Base representative confirmed that the token wasn't official, directing users to a disclaimer on the Zora page.

一位基本代表确认，令牌不是官方的，将用户指示ZORA页面上的免责声明。

The disclaimer stated that the token was "not an official ... token for Base, Coinbase, or any other related product or service" and was intended "solely for artistic and cultural purposes."

免责声明说，令牌“不是官方的……用于基础，共同基础或任何其他相关产品或服务的代币”，并且旨在“仅出于艺术和文化目的”。

These "content coins" are generated on Zora, where anyone can post content like images, videos, or articles, and the post will automatically mint an ERC-20 token.

这些“内容硬币”是在Zora上生成的，任何人都可以在其中发布图像，视频或文章之类的内容，并且该帖子将自动铸造ERC-20令牌。

The tokens are meant to be a way to collect value for creators and a standard for onchain culture.

代币是一种收集创作者价值的一种方式，也是OnChain文化的标准。

Base founder Jesse Pollak later explained these “content coins.” He described them as directly representing the content, stating, “The coin is the content and the content is the coin.”

基础创始人杰西·波拉克（Jesse Pollak）后来解释了这些“内容硬币”。他将它们描述为直接代表内容，并指出：“硬币是内容，内容是硬币。”

According to Pollak, market speculation is what drives the vast swings in the coin’s price, not the coin’s artistic purpose or cultural meaning.

根据Pollak的说法，市场投机是推动硬币价格巨大波动的原因，而不是硬币的艺术目的或文化意义。