 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Cryptocurrency News Articles
What was the voting result of Solana Community SIMD-0228 Proposal? Why did it fail?
Mar 14, 2025 at 02:49 pm
Solana's SIMD-0228 proposal, aiming to dynamically adjust SOL inflation based on staking participation, failed to pass with only 43.6% approval, raising concerns about market predictability and potential negative impacts on investor behavior.
On March 14, the Solana community ushered in the end of Epoch 755, and the highly anticipated voting results of the SIMD-0228 proposal were settled. The proposal, on reducing SOL pledge inflation, eventually received only 43.6% of votes in favor, 27.4% opposed, and 3.3% abstained, declaring its failure to pass in a result of less than half of the support, despite the total turnout rate reaching 74%.
SIMD-0228 proposal proposes major adjustments to the Solana blockchain token issuance model. It intends to transform the SOL token inflation model from the current fixed rate to a dynamic market mechanism linked to the staking participation rate. Its core goal is to optimize Solana's monetary policy based on the dynamic changes in the SOL pledge ratio by using inflation rates, thereby improving the flexibility and efficiency of the network economy.
From the perspective of the supporter, this dynamic mechanism can better adapt to market volatility. When the pledge participation rate is high, the inflation rate is appropriately reduced and the token oversupply is reduced; conversely, when the pledge participation rate is low, the inflation rate is increased, and more people are encouraged to participate in pledge, and network security and stability are maintained.
However, opponents also have many considerations. Some participants are concerned that dynamic mechanisms may lead to unstable market expectations. At the past fixed rates, investors had clear predictions about inflation. After changing to dynamic, the pledge ratio changes at any time, and the inflation rate is difficult to predict, which will increase the difficulty of investment decisions.
There are also views that the implementation of the proposal may trigger a series of chain reactions. For example, under the new mechanism, the calculation of pledge income is more complex, which may affect investors' enthusiasm for participating in pledges, and may even lead to some funds flowing out of the Solana ecosystem, which is not conducive to ecological development.
From the perspective of abstainers, some people are on the wait-and-see attitude towards the innovation of the proposal itself. On the one hand, we recognize the necessity of optimizing monetary policy, and on the other hand, we are worried that the new mechanism will bring unknown risks, so we choose to abstain from the pros and cons when we cannot weigh the pros and cons.
In addition, the Solana community has a complex ecology and different interest groups have different demands. There may be differences in the positions of large pledge institutions and small investors. Large institutions have strong funds, strong tolerance for market volatility, and pay more attention to long-term ecological development; small investors pay more attention to short-term returns stability and are more sensitive to proposals.
During the voting process, information dissemination and understanding may also affect the results. Some voters may not have a thorough understanding of the details and influence of the proposal, which will affect the voting tendency. For example, many people may have little understanding of the specific calculation method of inflation under dynamic mechanisms.
Furthermore, Solana's past market performance and community atmosphere will also vote in a voting manner. If the network was stable and the market was developing well before, people might be conservative about change; on the contrary, if they face many problems, the proposal for change will be more acceptable.
Although the SIMD-0228 proposal failed to pass this time, the community discussion it triggered is of far-reaching significance to the development of Solana's ecological development. In the future, the community may optimize and improve similar proposals based on this experience to better balance the interests of all parties and promote the sustained progress of the Solana network economy.
Disclaimer:info@kdj.com
The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research！
If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.
Other articles published on Mar 15, 2025
-
- What was the voting result of Solana Community SIMD-0228 Proposal? Why did it fail?
- Mar 14, 2025 at 02:49 pm
- Solana's SIMD-0228 proposal, aiming to dynamically adjust SOL inflation based on staking participation, failed to pass with only 43.6% approval, raising concerns about market predictability and potential negative impacts on investor behavior.
-
-
- The Trump family is negotiating with Binance.US: A new change in the cryptocurrency market?
- Mar 14, 2025 at 02:39 pm
- The Wall Street Journal reported negotiations between the Trump family and Binance.US for a potential investment, sparking debate in the crypto community. While Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao denied the report, the rumor highlights Binance.US's efforts to navigate US regulatory challenges and the Trump family's interest in cryptocurrency.
-
- Changpeng Zhao denies Trump family’s investment in Binance.US. What is the truth behind this?
- Mar 14, 2025 at 02:37 pm
- The Wall Street Journal reported negotiations between the Trump family and Binance.US, sparking BNB price fluctuations and intense debate, though CZ later denied the report, attributing it to attacks on the crypto industry and lingering anti-crypto sentiment.
-
- Rumors of Trump family investing in Binance.US: Is it true or just a rumor?
- Mar 14, 2025 at 02:34 pm
- The Wall Street Journal reported Trump family negotiations to invest in Binance.US, causing BNB price fluctuations and sparking debate within the crypto community, though Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao denied the report.
-
- When will the Hoodi test network launched by Ethereum Foundation developers be launched?
- Mar 14, 2025 at 09:52 am
- Ethereum's upcoming Hoodi testnet, launching March 17th, will rigorously test the Pectra upgrade before its anticipated April 25th mainnet activation, aiming to enhance scalability and usability.
-
- Why was the Ethereum Pectra activation schedule delayed?
- Mar 14, 2025 at 09:49 am
- Sepolia and Holesky Ethereum testnets experienced significant setbacks during Pectra upgrade testing due to configuration errors, delaying the mainnet launch and highlighting the complexities of large-scale ecosystem coordination.
-
- The 2025 Bitcoin Act adds new provisions for coordinating Bitcoin purchases with the ESF. What is the ESF?
- Mar 13, 2025 at 12:00 pm
- The 2025 Bitcoin bill's inclusion of the Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF) for coordinated Bitcoin purchases has sparked debate, as the ESF's traditional role in stabilizing financial markets now extends to the cryptocurrency realm.
-
- What strict changes will the purchase plan have in the 2025 version of the US Bitcoin Act compared to the 2024 version?
- Mar 13, 2025 at 11:58 am
- The 2025 Bitcoin bill strengthens the US government's Bitcoin acquisition strategy, mandating annual purchases of 200,000 coins, stricter holding requirements, and clearer funding mechanisms, ensuring greater stability and predictability than its 2024 predecessor.
