Market Cap: $2.6921T 0.410%
Volume(24h): $44.9049B 0.590%
  • Market Cap: $2.6921T 0.410%
  • Volume(24h): $44.9049B 0.590%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $2.6921T 0.410%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top News
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$85171.299126 USD

0.35%

ethereum
ethereum

$1612.789637 USD

1.03%

tether
tether

$0.999873 USD

0.02%

xrp
xrp

$2.084254 USD

0.12%

bnb
bnb

$592.810248 USD

0.23%

solana
solana

$141.017729 USD

2.10%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999872 USD

0.01%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.158015 USD

-0.65%

tron
tron

$0.244474 USD

1.36%

cardano
cardano

$0.631781 USD

-0.24%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.321500 USD

1.05%

chainlink
chainlink

$12.957466 USD

1.77%

avalanche
avalanche

$19.895856 USD

3.15%

stellar
stellar

$0.246525 USD

1.41%

toncoin
toncoin

$2.976633 USD

-0.79%

Cryptocurrency News Articles

Base Responds to Accusations of Encouraging Risky Behavior by Saying They Did Not Create or Launch the Token

Apr 17, 2025 at 07:30 pm

While some traders blamed Base and Coinbase for encouraging risky behavior, Base responded by saying they did not create, launch, or profit from the token.

Base Responds to Accusations of Encouraging Risky Behavior by Saying They Did Not Create or Launch the Token

While some traders placed blame on Base and Coinbase for encouraging risky behavior, Base responded by stating they did not create, launch, or profit from the token.

The token was automatically minted by Zora’s platform when a post was made — not something Base intentionally built or backed. The token’s Zora page even included warnings: it was not affiliated with Base or Coinbase, and buyers should expect no profit or returns. Instead, the coin was positioned as part of a broader experiment in content monetization — the first of several “contentcoins” designed to explore on-chain creative engagement.

But despite the disclaimers, blockchain analysis shows suspicious activity: three wallets purchased large volumes of the token before Base’s public post and made over $666,000 in profits — sparking accusations of insider trading.

What’s the Bigger Picture?

The controversy speaks to the growing tension between innovation and responsibility in crypto. On one hand, Base’s attempt to tokenize digital content via “contentcoins” is a bold step toward a new kind of interaction in the on-chain world. But on the other, poor execution, lack of pre-communication, and perceived official endorsement created real financial consequences for retail users.

AP Collective’s Abhishek Pawa criticized the execution as “disastrous,” noting that traders were left confused, expectations were misaligned, and responses from Base leadership felt “dismissive.” His assessment reflects the broader sentiment that Base underestimated the power and risk of its influence in a market where perception drives price.

Why Did the Token Recover?

Interestingly, after the crash, the token rebounded to around $17.4 million — a sign that speculators are still drawn to Base's high-profile association and the novelty of contentcoin experiments. It also reveals how speculative and sentiment-driven the memecoin space remains.

What’s Next for Base and Contentcoins?

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Other articles published on Apr 20, 2025