|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
这位以太坊联合创始人对 Michael Saylor 在接受采访时建议的加密货币用户应该使用大型银行机构来托管比特币做出了回应。
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has reacted to comments made by Michael Saylor, the co-founder of Microstrategy, suggesting that crypto users should use large banking institutions to hold custody over Bitcoin.
以太坊联合创始人 Vitalik Buterin 对 Microstrategy 联合创始人 Michael Saylor 的评论做出了回应,建议加密货币用户应该使用大型银行机构来托管比特币。
Buterin took to Twitter on Monday to express his disagreement with Saylor’s suggestion, calling it “batshit insane.” He pointed out that regulated public entities are already invested in Bitcoin, and their role in the crypto story shouldn’t expand beyond that.
布特林周一在推特上表达了他对塞勒建议的不同意见,称其“简直是疯了”。他指出,受监管的公共实体已经投资了比特币,它们在加密货币故事中的作用不应超出这一范围。
“I’ll happily say that I think @saylor‘s comments are batshit insane,” Buterin tweeted.
“我会很高兴地说,我认为 @saylor 的评论简直是疯了,”Buterin 发推文说。
“He seems to be explicitly arguing for a regulatory capture approach to protecting crypto (‘When you have regulated public entities like Blackrock and Fidelity and … holding the asset, all the lawmakers and law enforcement arms are invested in those entities’). There’s plenty of precedent for how this strategy can fail, and for me, it’s not what crypto is about.”
“他似乎明确主张采用监管捕获方法来保护加密货币(‘当你对贝莱德和富达等公共实体进行监管并......持有资产时,所有立法者和执法部门都会投资于这些实体’)。这种策略可能会失败的先例有很多,对我来说,这不是加密货币的意义所在。”
Buterin’s argument counters the idea of regulatory capture, which suggests that regulated public entities should hold digital assets so regulators and law enforcement might be more inclined to invest in them.
Buterin 的论点反驳了监管俘获的观点,即受监管的公共实体应该持有数字资产,这样监管机构和执法部门可能更倾向于投资这些资产。
Buterin believes this approach might eventually lead to these public entities taking over Bitcoin, which goes against the decentralization that Bitcoin stands for.
Buterin 认为这种做法最终可能会导致这些公共实体接管比特币,这违背了比特币所代表的去中心化原则。
Other notable crypto figures, such as Bitcoin custody firm Casa’s chief security officer Jameson Lopp and ShapeShift founder Erik Voorhees, agreed with Buterin’s stance against public entities expanding their role in the Bitcoin space by acting as third-party custodians.
其他著名的加密货币人物,例如比特币托管公司 Casa 的首席安全官 Jameson Lopp 和 ShapeShift 创始人 Erik Voorhees,都同意 Buterin 反对公共实体通过充当第三方托管人来扩大其在比特币领域的作用的立场。
They believe the practice could set a bad precedent and goes against the decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies, which is their biggest appeal.
他们认为这种做法可能会开创一个不好的先例,并且违背了加密货币的去中心化本质,而这正是他们最大的吸引力。
“Bitcoin self-custody isn’t just about being a paranoid mountain man,” Lopp tweeted.
洛普在推特上写道:“比特币的自我托管不仅仅是成为一个偏执的山人。”
“There are many long-term negative ramifications to convincing people to trust third-party custodians.
“说服人们信任第三方托管机构会产生许多长期的负面影响。
“Centralizing coins into a few hands increases the systemic risk of loss and seizure.
“将硬币集中到少数人手中会增加丢失和扣押的系统性风险。
“Fork choice activities get shifted away from Bitcoiners, who are disenfranchised from participating in governance activities like running nodes or trading forks.
“分叉选择活动不再由比特币持有者转移,他们被剥夺了参与运行节点或交易分叉等治理活动的权利。
“Self-custody is not merely important to individual Bitcoin holders. It’s important for the continued strengthening and improvement of the entire network.”
“自我托管不仅对个人比特币持有者很重要。这对于整个网络的持续加强和改进非常重要。”
Saylor’s argument is built on the notion that crypto could become a safer space if traditional financial institutions play the custodian role in it, which is a line of thinking that was countered by Buterin.
Saylor 的论点建立在这样的理念之上:如果传统金融机构在其中扮演托管人的角色,加密货币可能会成为一个更安全的空间,但 Buterin 反驳了这一观点。
免责声明:info@kdj.com
所提供的信息并非交易建议。根据本文提供的信息进行的任何投资,kdj.com不承担任何责任。加密货币具有高波动性,强烈建议您深入研究后,谨慎投资!
如您认为本网站上使用的内容侵犯了您的版权,请立即联系我们(info@kdj.com),我们将及时删除。
-
- 比特币在 UPTOBER 中爆炸意味着是时候购买更多比特币或再见了
- 2024-10-24 00:30:02
- 帖子的内容和时机表明清崎认为,发稿时的低迷实际上是一个“逢低买入”的机会
-
- Mantra Chain主网上线,将现实世界资产带入区块链技术
- 2024-10-24 00:25:13
- Mantra 推出了 MANTRA Chain 主网,距离传统金融与区块链技术融合的目标又近了一步。