|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
這位以太坊聯合創始人對 Michael Saylor 在接受採訪時建議的加密貨幣用戶應該使用大型銀行機構來託管比特幣做出了回應。
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has reacted to comments made by Michael Saylor, the co-founder of Microstrategy, suggesting that crypto users should use large banking institutions to hold custody over Bitcoin.
以太坊聯合創始人 Vitalik Buterin 對 Microstrategy 聯合創始人 Michael Saylor 的評論做出了回應,建議加密貨幣用戶應該使用大型銀行機構來託管比特幣。
Buterin took to Twitter on Monday to express his disagreement with Saylor’s suggestion, calling it “batshit insane.” He pointed out that regulated public entities are already invested in Bitcoin, and their role in the crypto story shouldn’t expand beyond that.
布特林周一在推特上表達了他對塞勒建議的不同意見,稱其「簡直是瘋了」。他指出,受監管的公共實體已經投資了比特幣,它們在加密貨幣故事中的作用不應超出這一範圍。
“I’ll happily say that I think @saylor‘s comments are batshit insane,” Buterin tweeted.
「我會很高興地說,我認為 @saylor 的評論簡直是瘋了,」Buterin 在推特上寫道。
“He seems to be explicitly arguing for a regulatory capture approach to protecting crypto (‘When you have regulated public entities like Blackrock and Fidelity and … holding the asset, all the lawmakers and law enforcement arms are invested in those entities’). There’s plenty of precedent for how this strategy can fail, and for me, it’s not what crypto is about.”
「他似乎明確主張採用監管捕獲方法來保護加密貨幣(『當你對貝萊德和富達等公共實體進行監管並......持有資產時,所有立法者和執法部門都會投資於這些實體')。這種策略可能會失敗的先例有很多,對我來說,這不是加密貨幣的意義所在。
Buterin’s argument counters the idea of regulatory capture, which suggests that regulated public entities should hold digital assets so regulators and law enforcement might be more inclined to invest in them.
Buterin 的論點反駁了監管捕獲的觀點,即受監管的公共實體應該持有數位資產,因此監管機構和執法部門可能更傾向於投資這些資產。
Buterin believes this approach might eventually lead to these public entities taking over Bitcoin, which goes against the decentralization that Bitcoin stands for.
Buterin 認為這種做法最終可能會導致這些公共實體接管比特幣,這違反了比特幣所代表的去中心化原則。
Other notable crypto figures, such as Bitcoin custody firm Casa’s chief security officer Jameson Lopp and ShapeShift founder Erik Voorhees, agreed with Buterin’s stance against public entities expanding their role in the Bitcoin space by acting as third-party custodians.
其他著名的加密貨幣人物,例如比特幣託管公司 Casa 的首席安全官 Jameson Lopp 和 ShapeShift 創始人 Erik Voorhees,都同意 Buterin 反對公共實體通過充當第三方託管人來擴大其在比特幣領域的作用的立場。
They believe the practice could set a bad precedent and goes against the decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies, which is their biggest appeal.
他們認為這種做法可能會開創一個不好的先例,並且違背了加密貨幣的去中心化本質,而這正是他們最大的吸引力。
“Bitcoin self-custody isn’t just about being a paranoid mountain man,” Lopp tweeted.
「比特幣自我託管不僅僅是成為一個偏執的山人,」洛普在推特上寫道。
“There are many long-term negative ramifications to convincing people to trust third-party custodians.
「說服人們信任第三方託管機構會產生許多長期的負面影響。
“Centralizing coins into a few hands increases the systemic risk of loss and seizure.
「將硬幣集中到少數人手中會增加丟失和扣押的系統性風險。
“Fork choice activities get shifted away from Bitcoiners, who are disenfranchised from participating in governance activities like running nodes or trading forks.
「分叉選擇活動不再由比特幣持有者轉移,他們被剝奪了參與運行節點或交易分叉等治理活動的權利。
“Self-custody is not merely important to individual Bitcoin holders. It’s important for the continued strengthening and improvement of the entire network.”
「自我託管不僅對個人比特幣持有者很重要。這對於整個網路的持續加強和改進非常重要。
Saylor’s argument is built on the notion that crypto could become a safer space if traditional financial institutions play the custodian role in it, which is a line of thinking that was countered by Buterin.
Saylor 的論點建立在這樣的理念之上:如果傳統金融機構在其中扮演託管人的角色,加密貨幣可能會成為一個更安全的空間,但 Buterin 反駁了這個觀點。
免責聲明:info@kdj.com
所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!
如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。
-
- 比特幣在 UPTOBER 中爆炸意味著是時候購買更多比特幣或再見了
- 2024-10-24 00:30:02
- 貼文的內容和時機表明清崎認為,發稿時的低迷實際上是一個「逢低買入」的機會
-
- Mantra Chain主網上線,將現實世界資產帶入區塊鏈技術
- 2024-10-24 00:25:13
- Mantra 推出了 MANTRA Chain 主網,距離傳統金融與區塊鏈技術融合的目標又更近了一步。