为什么瑞波稳定币（RLUSD）今年不会全面投入运营

XRP 社区目前充斥着关于 Ripple 稳定币 RLUSD 即将发布的猜测。与广泛流传的谣言相反

XRPL validator Vet has clarified that the Ripple stablecoin (RLUSD) will not be fully operational on the XRP Ledger (XRPL) this year, owing to technical constraints.

XRPL 验证器 Vet 澄清，由于技术限制，Ripple 稳定币（RLUSD）今年不会在 XRP Ledger（XRPL）上全面运行。

Vet, who is also the co-founder of the leading NFT marketplace on the XRPL, explained in a post on X that the RLUSD will either launch only on the Ethereum network this year or be launched on the XRPL without the ability to be used in the Automated Market Maker (AMM) initially.

Vet 也是 XRPL 上领先的 NFT 市场的联合创始人，他在 X 上的一篇文章中解释说，RLUSD 今年要么只在以太坊网络上推出，要么在 XRPL 上推出，但无法在其他地方使用。最初是自动做市商（AMM）。

“I expect, or rather hope, for the latter,” Vet said.

“我期待，或者更确切地说希望是后者，”维特说。

The technical constraint stems from the ‘clawback’ feature enabled on the RLUSD, which is not currently supported by the XRPL for assets that can be used in the AMM.

技术限制源于 RLUSD 上启用的“回拨”功能，对于可在 AMM 中使用的资产，XRPL 目前不支持该功能。

“RLUSD is a stablecoin with clawback settings enabled. Tokens with this setting are denied by the XRP Ledger to be used in the AMM. There are amendments in the works to help solving this,” Vet added.

“RLUSD 是一种启用了回拨设置的稳定币。具有此设置的代币将被 XRP Ledger 拒绝在 AMM 中使用。正在制定一些修正案来帮助解决这个问题。”Vet 补充道。

Specifically, Vet mentioned XLS-73 AMM Clawback and XLS-77, which aim to provide more control over trustlines and restrict the transferability of RLUSD under certain conditions. XLS-73 aims to modify the AMM system to accommodate assets with clawback features, while XLS-77 is intended to allow for a deeper freeze of Trustlines further securing the network against misuse by blacklisted accounts.

具体来说，Vet 提到了 XLS-73 AMM Clawback 和 XLS-77，它们旨在提供对信任线的更多控制，并在某些条件下限制 RLUSD 的可转移性。 XLS-73 旨在修改 AMM 系统，以适应具有回拨功能的资产，而 XLS-77 旨在允许更深入地冻结 Trustlines，进一步保护网络免受黑名单帐户的滥用。

“In other words, because the XRPL is decentralized these amendments are impossible to predict when they will come, especially given the fatigue I observed. I love seeing people be excited about things happening on chain via the tracker I made, educating themselves on trustlines and IOUs on the XRPL is exactly where I want attention to go to, as opposed to screenshots of articles, partnerships and secret committee hot air talk,” Vet concluded.

“换句话来说，由于 XRPL 是去中心化的，因此无法预测这些修正案何时会到来，特别是考虑到我观察到的疲劳。我喜欢看到人们通过我制作的跟踪器对链上发生的事情感到兴奋，在 XRPL 上的信任线和欠条上进行自我教育，这正是我想要关注的地方，而不是文章的屏幕截图、合作伙伴关系和秘密委员会的空谈，”兽医总结道。

Meanwhile, Ripple CTO David “JoelKatz” Schwartz commented on Vet's explanation, specifically on the role of XLS-77 in freezing assets, in a separate commentary on X.

与此同时，Ripple 首席技术官 David “JoelKatz” Schwartz 在 X 的另一篇评论中评论了 Vet 的解释，特别是 XLS-77 在冻结资产中的作用。

“ FWIW, I’m not sure I like the description of XLS-77 as a ‘deeper’ freeze. If anything, it’s less deep. Unless I’m missing something, in any case where XLS-77 makes a difference, an asset that would have been frozen is, instead, not frozen,” Schwartz said.

“ FWIW，我不确定我是否喜欢将 XLS-77 描述为“更深”的冻结。如果有的话，那就是深度没那么深了。除非我遗漏了什么，否则在任何情况下，XLS-77 都会发挥作用，本应被冻结的资产实际上并没有被冻结，”Schwartz 说道。

Vet responded to Schwartz's critique by acknowledging the complexity of the terms and their implications across the XRPL infrastructure.

Vet 通过承认术语的复杂性及其对 XRPL 基础设施的影响来回应 Schwartz 的批评。

“Good point…hmmm…in my mind it made sense because the freeze goes beyond the trustline, it includes the payment engine and dex – maybe that's why ‘deep',” Vet said.

“好点......嗯......在我看来这是有道理的，因为冻结超出了信任线，它包括支付引擎和 dex - 也许这就是为什么'深度'，”Vet 说。

Another XRPL community member, Daniel Keller, sought further clarification on whether the core statement about the Ripple stablecoin is pure speculation or a fact, to which Vet replied that it is confirmed by the XRPL that it's not possible.

另一位 XRPL 社区成员 Daniel Keller 寻求进一步澄清有关 Ripple 稳定币的核心声明是纯粹的猜测还是事实，Vet 回复称，XRPL 已证实这是不可能的。