果冻清算事件过后，超液体面对大量流出

根据区块链分析公司PARSEC的数据，在果冻清算事件发生后，Hyproliquid在果冻清算事件发生后面临着大量的外流。

Hyperliquid, a decentralized exchange, has seen significant outflows following a massive liquidation event that unfolded on February 26. According to blockchain analytics firm Parsec, Hyperliquid’s USDC reserves have decreased from a high of $2.58 billion over the past 30 days to $2.02 billion within hours of the controversy.

在2月26日举行的大规模清算事件发生后，Hyperliquid是一种分散的交换。根据区块链分析公司Parsec的说法，Hyplliquid的USDC储量从过去30天的高点减少到争议的数小时内的25.8亿美元。

This coincides with a Bitcoin whale liquidation that triggered $300 million in outflows. The impact of these losses has put Hyperliquid under intense scrutiny, raising concerns about its risk management strategies.

这与比特币鲸清算触发了3亿美元的外流相吻合。这些损失的影响使超流动性受到严格的审查，引起了人们对其风险管理策略的担忧。

The incident began when Hyperliquid’s treasury took a $5 million short position in JELLY. However, an unexpected spike in the token’s price from $0.0095 to $0.012 after the market opened on February 26 turned this into a major issue. The unrealized loss quickly ballooned to $10.63 million. If JELLY had reached $0.17, Hyperliquid’s treasury could have faced a catastrophic $240 million loss.

该事件始于超流动的财政部在果冻中占据500万美元的短职位。但是，在2月26日开放市场后，令牌价格从0.0095美元到0.012美元的出乎意料的高峰将其变成了一个重大问题。未实现的损失迅速激增至1063万美元。如果果冻达到0.17美元，Hyperliquid的财政部可能会面临灾难性的2.4亿美元亏损。

This price movement appears to have been manipulated. A wallet identified as 0xde95 opened a 430 million JELLY short position on HyperliquidX and swiftly removed its margin, leading to a cascade of liquidations. Another wallet, 0x20e8, simultaneously opened a large long position in the token, further driving the price up.

这种价格变动似乎已被操纵。一个被识别为0xde95的钱包在超液体上打开了4.3亿个果冻短位置，并迅速删除了其边缘，导致了一系列清算。另一个钱包0x20E8同时在代币中开了一个巨大的长位置，进一步推动了价格。

In an attempt to control the damage, Hyperliquid’s validator committee delisted JELLY and force-settled it at $0.0095. The platform stated that short positions would be settled at their initial entry price, with the Hyper Foundation covering any losses.

为了控制损害，Hyperliquid的验证者委员会将Jelly授予了果冻，并将其定为0.0095美元。该平台指出，短职位将以其初始入口价格解决，超级基础涵盖了任何损失。

The response to Hyperliquid’s handling of the incident has been mixed. While some praised the platform’s quick action, others criticized its handling of the situation. Notably, Bitget CEO Gary Chen slammed Hyperliquid’s platform as “immature, unethical, and unprofessional.” Chen also pointed out that Hyperliquid is operating as an unregulated offshore exchange rather than a decentralized finance (DeFi) platform, further fueling criticism.

对超流动性处理事件的处理的反应已混合在一起。尽管有些人称赞该平台的快速行动，但其他人则批评其处理情况。值得注意的是，Bitget首席执行官Gary Chen将超流动性的平台猛烈抨击为“不成熟，不道德和不专业”。陈还指出，Hyperliquid是作为不受监管的离岸交易所而不是分散的金融（DEFI）平台运行的，进一步加剧了批评。

The incident also led to a drop in Hyperliquid’s native token, HYPE. In the past 24 hours, HYPE has decreased by 10%, despite an increase in volume by 443% to $466 million. Despite the decline, HYPE is still 284% above its all-time low and 58% below its all-time high of $34.96.

该事件还导致超流动物的天然令牌炒作下降。在过去的24小时内，炒作减少了10％，尽管数量增加了443％，达到4.66亿美元。尽管有所下降，但炒作仍然比历史最低低的284％，低于其34.96美元的历史高处58％。

Moreover, the total value locked (TVL) in Hyperliquid’s Hyperliquidity Provider Vault has decreased significantly from a peak of $540 million on February 10 to $195 million as of March 27, according to DefiLlama data. This decrease highlights a lack of confidence in the platform’s ability to manage liquidity effectively.

此外，根据Defillama数据，截至3月27日，Hyplliquid超流动性提供商保管库中的总价值锁定（TVL）已从2月10日的5.4亿美元达到1.95亿美元。这减少了，这突显了对平台有效管理流动性能力的信心。

The incident has had a lasting impact on Hyperliquid, which is now facing financial and reputational damage. As the industry watches closely, Hyperliquid’s next steps will be crucial in determining its long-term stability and credibility.

该事件对超流动性产生了持久的影响，这现在正面临财务和声誉损失。随着行业的密切关注，Hyplliquid的下一步对确定其长期稳定性和信誉至关重要。