果凍清算事件過後，超液體面對大量流出

根據區塊鏈分析公司PARSEC的數據，在果凍清算事件發生後，Hyproliquid在果凍清算事件發生後面臨著大量的外流。

Hyperliquid, a decentralized exchange, has seen significant outflows following a massive liquidation event that unfolded on February 26. According to blockchain analytics firm Parsec, Hyperliquid’s USDC reserves have decreased from a high of $2.58 billion over the past 30 days to $2.02 billion within hours of the controversy.

在2月26日舉行的大規模清算事件發生後，Hyperliquid是一種分散的交換。根據區塊鏈分析公司Parsec的說法，Hyplliquid的USDC儲量從過去30天的高點減少到爭議的數小時內的25.8億美元。

This coincides with a Bitcoin whale liquidation that triggered $300 million in outflows. The impact of these losses has put Hyperliquid under intense scrutiny, raising concerns about its risk management strategies.

這與比特幣鯨清算觸發了3億美元的外流相吻合。這些損失的影響使超流動性受到嚴格的審查，引起了人們對其風險管理策略的擔憂。

The incident began when Hyperliquid’s treasury took a $5 million short position in JELLY. However, an unexpected spike in the token’s price from $0.0095 to $0.012 after the market opened on February 26 turned this into a major issue. The unrealized loss quickly ballooned to $10.63 million. If JELLY had reached $0.17, Hyperliquid’s treasury could have faced a catastrophic $240 million loss.

該事件始於超流動的財政部在果凍中佔據500萬美元的短職位。但是，在2月26日開放市場後，令牌價格從0.0095美元到0.012美元的出乎意料的高峰將其變成了一個重大問題。未實現的損失迅速激增至1063萬美元。如果果凍達到0.17美元，Hyperliquid的財政部可能會面臨災難性的2.4億美元虧損。

This price movement appears to have been manipulated. A wallet identified as 0xde95 opened a 430 million JELLY short position on HyperliquidX and swiftly removed its margin, leading to a cascade of liquidations. Another wallet, 0x20e8, simultaneously opened a large long position in the token, further driving the price up.

這種價格變動似乎已被操縱。一個被識別為0xde95的錢包在超液體上打開了4.3億個果凍短位置，並迅速刪除了其邊緣，導致了一系列清算。另一個錢包0x20E8同時在代幣中開了一個巨大的長位置，進一步推動了價格。

In an attempt to control the damage, Hyperliquid’s validator committee delisted JELLY and force-settled it at $0.0095. The platform stated that short positions would be settled at their initial entry price, with the Hyper Foundation covering any losses.

為了控制損害，Hyperliquid的驗證者委員會將Jelly授予了果凍，並將其定為0.0095美元。該平台指出，短職位將以其初始入口價格解決，超級基礎涵蓋了任何損失。

The response to Hyperliquid’s handling of the incident has been mixed. While some praised the platform’s quick action, others criticized its handling of the situation. Notably, Bitget CEO Gary Chen slammed Hyperliquid’s platform as “immature, unethical, and unprofessional.” Chen also pointed out that Hyperliquid is operating as an unregulated offshore exchange rather than a decentralized finance (DeFi) platform, further fueling criticism.

對超流動性處理事件的處理的反應已混合在一起。儘管有些人稱讚該平台的快速行動，但其他人則批評其處理情況。值得注意的是，Bitget首席執行官Gary Chen將超流動性的平台猛烈抨擊為“不成熟，不道德和不專業”。陳還指出，Hyperliquid是作為不受監管的離岸交易所而不是分散的金融（DEFI）平台運行的，進一步加劇了批評。

The incident also led to a drop in Hyperliquid’s native token, HYPE. In the past 24 hours, HYPE has decreased by 10%, despite an increase in volume by 443% to $466 million. Despite the decline, HYPE is still 284% above its all-time low and 58% below its all-time high of $34.96.

該事件還導致超流動物的天然令牌炒作下降。在過去的24小時內，炒作減少了10％，儘管數量增加了443％，達到4.66億美元。儘管有所下降，但炒作仍然比歷史最低低的284％，低於其34.96美元的歷史高處58％。

Moreover, the total value locked (TVL) in Hyperliquid’s Hyperliquidity Provider Vault has decreased significantly from a peak of $540 million on February 10 to $195 million as of March 27, according to DefiLlama data. This decrease highlights a lack of confidence in the platform’s ability to manage liquidity effectively.

此外，根據Defillama數據，截至3月27日，Hyplliquid超流動性提供商保管庫中的總價值鎖定（TVL）已從2月10日的5.4億美元達到1.95億美元。這減少了，這突顯了對平台有效管理流動性能力的信心。

The incident has had a lasting impact on Hyperliquid, which is now facing financial and reputational damage. As the industry watches closely, Hyperliquid’s next steps will be crucial in determining its long-term stability and credibility.

該事件對超流動性產生了持久的影響，這現在正面臨財務和聲譽損失。隨著行業的密切關注，Hyplliquid的下一步對確定其長期穩定性和信譽至關重要。