Hawk Tuah 女孩团队因其 Memecoin 项目被起诉

这是近几个月来最离奇的加密货币故事之一，Hawk Tuah 女孩团队因其 memecoin 项目而被起诉。

Haliey Welch's foray into the world of memecoins has taken an unexpected turn, with her team being hit with a lawsuit over the venture.

哈莉·韦尔奇 (Haliey Welch) 进军模因币世界的举动发生了意想不到的转变，她的团队因该合资企业遭到了诉讼。

The legal action stems from the launch of $HAWK, a Solana-based memecoin that was promoted by Welch and her team.

此次法律诉讼源于 $HAWK 的推出，这是一种由 Welch 及其团队推广的基于 Solana 的 memecoin。

According to a document filed to court on Wednesday, the lawsuit 'arises from the unlawful promotion and sale of the Hawk Tuah cryptocurrency memecoin, known as the "$HAWK" token (the "Token" or "$HAWK"), which Defendants offered and sold to the public without proper registration'.

根据周三提交给法庭的一份文件，该诉讼“源于非法推广和销售 Hawk Tuah 加密货币 memecoin，即所谓的“$HAWK”代币（“Token”或“$HAWK”），被告提供了该代币并在未经适当注册的情况下向公众出售”。

Among those named in the lawsuit are Tuah The Moon Foundation, which oversaw the memecoin's finances, OverHere Ltd, which created the coin, and Clinton So, an executive at OverHere.

诉讼中提到的人士包括负责监督 memecoin 财务的 Tuah The Moon 基金会、创建该货币的 OverHere Ltd 以及 OverHere 的高管 Clinton So。

The lawsuit also names Alex Larson Schultz, the coin's promoter, as a defendant.

该诉讼还将代币发起人亚历克斯·拉尔森·舒尔茨 (Alex Larson Schultz) 列为被告。

However, Welch herself was not named in the complaint, which alleges that the defendants used her social media following to market the coin to 'emphasize community engagement, inclusivity, and bridge mainstream culture with the cryptocurrency world'.

然而，起诉书中没有提到韦尔奇本人的名字，指控被告利用她的社交媒体粉丝来营销该代币，以“强调社区参与、包容性，并将主流文化与加密货币世界联系起来”。

The lawsuit comes after Welch's team faced accusations of a 'rug pull' - a term used to describe a scenario where cryptocurrency developers quickly sell their tokens and leave investors with worthless coins.

在这起诉讼之前，韦尔奇的团队面临“地毯拉动”的指控，该术语用于描述加密货币开发商迅速出售其代币并给投资者留下毫无价值的代币的情况。

Welch's team has denied these accusations, with the Solana Girl herself taking to Twitter to address the controversy.

韦尔奇的团队否认了这些指控，索拉纳女孩本人也在推特上回应了这一争议。

"Hawkanomics: Team hasn’t sold one token and not 1 KOL was given 1 free token," she tweeted in a copy and pasted message.

“Hawkanomics：团队尚未出售任何代币，也没有向 1 位 KOL 提供 1 个免费代币，”她在推文中复制并粘贴了消息。

"We tried to stop snipers as best we could through high fee’s in the start of launch on @MeteoraAG. Fee’s have now been dropped."

“在 @MeteoraAG 上发布之初，我们试图通过高额费用来尽最大努力阻止狙击手。现在费用已被降低。”

But readers added their own context to the tweet claiming her team had sold.

但读者在推文中添加了自己的背景，声称她的团队已经出售。

It read: "The 'team' and insiders have actually been selling their token since launch.

它写道：“自推出以来，‘团队’和内部人士实际上一直在出售他们的代币。

"A majority have never purchased anything and have only sold the tokens they were given.

“大多数人从未购买过任何东西，只出售了他们收到的代币。

"Haliey is lying and will likely have to 'talk tuah' judge about this."

“哈利在撒谎，很可能不得不就此事与法官‘交谈’。”

Following the launch of $HAWK, its value reportedly plummeted from as much as $490 million to just $41 million. Some news outlets reckoned it lost more than 95 percent of its value.

据报道，$HAWK 推出后，其价值从 4.9 亿美元暴跌至 4100 万美元。一些新闻媒体估计它的价值损失了 95% 以上。

After the dust settled, OverHere - the official platform for Welch's $HAWK token - issued a statement about the matter.

尘埃落定后，韦尔奇 $HAWK 代币的官方平台 OverHere 就此事发表了声明。

The team revealed the so-called 'truth' about what happened.

该团队揭露了所发生事件的所谓“真相”。

On the memecoin, they said: "Hailey Welch—a literal meme—launching a meme coin felt like synchronicity.

关于模因币，他们说：“海莉·韦尔奇（Hailey Welch）——一个真正的模因——推出模因币感觉就像是同步性的。

"Our goal was simple: bring Web2 fans into Web3 seamlessly. A way to bring Web2 into crypto through culture, not just speculation."

“我们的目标很简单：将 Web2 粉丝无缝带入 Web3。通过文化而不仅仅是投机将 Web2 带入加密货币的一种方式。”

As to how things unravelled, overHere says that 'community sentiment shifted'.

至于事情是如何解决的，overHere 表示“社区情绪发生了变化”。

"As desperation kicked in, participation conditions were progressively watered down," the team said.

该团队表示：“随着绝望的到来，参与条件逐渐被淡化。”

"What started with plans for a lock-up eventually ended with none."

“一开始的锁定计划最终以无果而终。”

It went on to place blame on an individual who goes by Doc Hollywood, who apparently 'controlled all token decisions, fees, treasury'.

它接着将责任归咎于一个被称为“好莱坞博士”的人，他显然“控制了所有象征性的决定、费用和财务”。

Then, overHere further insisted that it made zero revenue from the whole debacle and that Doc Hollywood allegedly charged 15 percent trading fees.

然后，overHere 进一步坚称，它从整个灾难中获得的收入为零，并且据称 Doc Hollywood 收取 15% 的交易费。

These allegations were denied by Alexander Larson Shultz, the team member nicknamed 'Doc Hollywood', as reported by IBT.

据 IBT 报道，绰号“好莱坞医生”的团队成员亚历山大·拉尔森·舒尔茨否认了这些指控。