加密货币大亨Changpeng Zhao（CZ）面对分散的交流障碍，同时为Meme Coin受害者率先为社区驱动的救济工作

CZ的DEX斗争Binance创始人CZ最近承认，他的新手与分散交流（DEX）的斗争引发了有关用户可访问性的辩论。

Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) has opened up about his struggles with decentralised exchanges (DEX), sparking discussions about user accessibility and prompting him to spearhead a community-driven relief effort for victims of collapsed meme coins.

Binance创始人Changpeng Zhao（CZ）已经公开了他与分散交流（DEX）的斗争，引发了有关用户可访问性的讨论，并促使他为崩溃的模因硬币的受害者带头救济。

CZ's DEX Ordeal

CZ的DEX折磨

Recently, CZ shared his firsthand experience with DEX, highlighting challenges that retail investors often encounter. Despite being an industry veteran, CZ encountered difficulties while attempting a basic transaction in a liquidity pool. He noted that the error messages were unclear and that bots were front-running his trades.

最近，CZ与DEX分享了他的第一手经验，强调了散户投资者经常遇到的挑战。尽管是行业退伍军人，但CZ在尝试在流动性库中进行基本交易时遇到了困难。他指出，错误消息尚不清楚，并且机器人是他的交易。

"Everyone can see your moves in real time," he said, raising concerns about privacy. Meanwhile, his initiative to donate $1 million to victims of failed meme coins Test (TST) and BROCCOLI gained steam, underscoring the tension between crypto innovation and user protection.

他说：“每个人都可以实时看到您的举动。”同时，他为失败的模因硬币测试（TST）和西兰花的受害者捐款100万美元的倡议获得了Steam，这强调了加密创新与用户保护之间的紧张关系。

Shifting away from centralised platforms, CZ acknowledged the steep learning curve involved in using DEX. "DEX experiences need improvement," he asserted, urging developers to simplify interfaces. His candidness reflects broader frustrations among retail investors who have been swept up in the volatility of meme coins.

CZ从集中式平台移开，承认使用DEX涉及的陡峭学习曲线。他断言：“ DEX体验需要改进，”敦促开发人员简化界面。他的坦率反映了在模因硬币的波动中席卷的零售投资者中的更广泛的挫败感。

$1 Million Donation Plan

100万美元捐赠计划

Following a university student's philanthropic drive that inspired CZ's initial $100,000 contribution, community feedback is now guiding his pledge to donate $1 million (157 BNB) to meme coin victims.

在一名大学生的慈善活动激发了CZ最初的100,000美元捐款之后，社区反馈现在指导他承诺向Meme Coin受害者捐款100万美元（157 BNB）。

Quickly dismissing direct payouts to individuals due to the difficulty in verifying identities, he said, "Focus on community-wide actions," redirecting the conversation toward scalable solutions.

他说，由于难以验证身份的困难，迅速将直接支付给个人，他说：“专注于社区范围的行动”，将对话重定向到可扩展的解决方案。

Meanwhile, suggestions poured in on social media, with proposals ranging from partnerships with non-profits to token burns or investments in liquidity pools. Throughout the discussions, CZ has emphasised the importance of transparency, demanding that recipient organisations adopt blockchain-trackable disbursement methods. "Funds must reach end beneficiaries visibly," he insisted, aligning with his recent trends in crypto-backed charity.

同时，建议在社交媒体上涌入，提议从与非营利组织的合作伙伴关系到代币的烧伤或对流动性池的投资。在整个讨论中，CZ都强调了透明度的重要性，要求接受者组织采用可区块链跟踪的支付方法。他坚持说：“资金必须明显地达到最终的受益人。”

Transparency Demands in Charity Discussions

慈善讨论中的透明度要求

CZ's criteria for beneficiaries prioritise accountability, narrowing the options to crypto-enabled non-profits. "Tracking mechanisms are non-negotiable," he stated, echoing calls for auditable fund flows. While some supporters advocate token burns to boost asset values, others champion liquidity pools, a method CZ personally tested.

CZ对受益人的标准优先考虑问责制，从而缩小了支持加密的非营利组织的选项。他说：“跟踪机制是不可谈判的。”尽管一些支持者主张代币燃烧以提高资产价值，而另一些支持者则支持流动性库，但CZ亲自测试了一种方法。

However, scepticism persists. Critics argue that token burns offer only fleeting value, while liquidity pools carry the risk of being used for market manipulation. On the other hand, donations to non-profits face logistical challenges, including the need for regulatory compliance. Undeterred, CZ hinted at a possible hybrid model. "Portions could go to vetted charities; others might fuel liquidity," he said, blending idealism with pragmatism.

但是，怀疑主义仍然存在。评论家认为，令牌燃烧只提供短暂的价值，而流动性池则具有用于市场操纵的风险。另一方面，向非营利组织的捐款面临后勤挑战，包括需要进行监管合规性。 CZ未经避免，暗示了可能的混合模型。他说：“部分可能会流向审查的慈善机构；其他人可能会助长流动性。”他将理想主义与实用主义融合在一起。

Liquidity Pool Tests

流动性池测试

Experiments with liquidity pools have influenced CZ's stance on fund deployment. After an initial clumsy attempt, he came to appreciate their potential. "Liquidity pools indirectly reward communities," he said, downplaying any profit motives. Yet technical barriers remain.

使用流动性池的实验影响了CZ对基金部署的立场。经过最初的笨拙尝试，他开始欣赏他们的潜力。他说：“流动性池间接奖励社区。”然而，技术障碍仍然存在。

Wallet operators flagged the complexities of airdrops, anticipating disputes over eligibility if tokens were to be distributed broadly.

钱包操作员标记了空调的复杂性，如果要大规模分发令牌，则预计有资格的争议。

CZ agreed, calling airdrops a "steep mountain" due to the gaps in verification. Instead, he suggested liquidity injections or strategic burns as alternatives to avoid logistical nightmares. Notably, he confirmed that the donated BNB would not remain in his possession, assuring stakeholders of an impartial execution.

CZ同意，由于验证的差距，AirDrops称AirDrops为“陡峭的山”。取而代之的是，他建议注射流动性或战略性燃烧作为避免后勤噩梦的替代方法。值得注意的是，他确认捐赠的BNB不会保留在他的财产中，从而确保利益相关者公正地处决。

Meme Coin Fallout

模因硬币辐射

CZ's ordeal highlights a pressing dilemma: crypto's promise of decentralisation often clashes with usability. Beginners must navigate opaque systems, while the whimsical volatility of meme coins leaves investors vulnerable. His donation initiative, while remedial, spotlights the industry's need for safeguards.

CZ的磨难突出了一个紧迫的困境：加密货币的权力下放的承诺通常与可用性发生冲突。初学者必须浏览不透明的系统，而模因硬币的异想天开的波动使投资者脆弱。他的捐款倡议虽然得到补救，但仍关注该行业对保障措施的需求。

Meanwhile, developers face mounting pressure to enhance DEX designs. "Error messages must clarify, not confuse," CZ urged, advocating intuitive upgrades. As the debates rage, one truth emerges: crypto's growth hinges on balancing innovation with empathy. For now, CZ's $1 million plan offers a blueprint for community-centric crisis response, if executed transparently.

同时，开发人员面临着增强DEX设计的不断增长的压力。 CZ敦促说：“错误消息必须澄清而不是混淆。”提倡直观的升级。随着辩论的愤怒，一个真理的出现：加密货币的成长取决于平衡创新与同理心的平衡。目前，如果透明执行，CZ的100万美元计划为以社区为中心的危机响应提供了蓝图。

As Binance's founder navigates the meme coin chaos, his dual role as industry leader and accidental DEX novice reminds stakeholders: even experts grapple with crypto's complexities.

当Binance的创始人驾驶Meme Coin Chaos时，他作为行业领导者的双重角色和偶然的DEX新手提醒利益相关者：甚至专家也努力应对加密货币的复杂性。