加密貨幣大亨Changpeng Zhao（CZ）面對分散的交流障礙，同時為Meme Coin受害者率先為社區驅動的救濟工作

CZ的DEX鬥爭Binance創始人CZ最近承認，他的新手與分散交流（DEX）的鬥爭引發了有關用戶可訪問性的辯論。

Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) has opened up about his struggles with decentralised exchanges (DEX), sparking discussions about user accessibility and prompting him to spearhead a community-driven relief effort for victims of collapsed meme coins.

Binance創始人Changpeng Zhao（CZ）已經公開了他與分散交流（DEX）的鬥爭，引發了有關用戶可訪問性的討論，並促使他為崩潰的模因硬幣的受害者帶頭救濟。

CZ's DEX Ordeal

CZ的DEX折磨

Recently, CZ shared his firsthand experience with DEX, highlighting challenges that retail investors often encounter. Despite being an industry veteran, CZ encountered difficulties while attempting a basic transaction in a liquidity pool. He noted that the error messages were unclear and that bots were front-running his trades.

最近，CZ與DEX分享了他的第一手經驗，強調了散戶投資者經常遇到的挑戰。儘管是行業退伍軍人，但CZ在嘗試在流動性庫中進行基本交易時遇到了困難。他指出，錯誤消息尚不清楚，並且機器人是他的交易。

"Everyone can see your moves in real time," he said, raising concerns about privacy. Meanwhile, his initiative to donate $1 million to victims of failed meme coins Test (TST) and BROCCOLI gained steam, underscoring the tension between crypto innovation and user protection.

他說：“每個人都可以實時看到您的舉動。”同時，他為失敗的模因硬幣測試（TST）和西蘭花的受害者捐款100萬美元的倡議獲得了Steam，這強調了加密創新與用戶保護之間的緊張關係。

Shifting away from centralised platforms, CZ acknowledged the steep learning curve involved in using DEX. "DEX experiences need improvement," he asserted, urging developers to simplify interfaces. His candidness reflects broader frustrations among retail investors who have been swept up in the volatility of meme coins.

CZ從集中式平台移開，承認使用DEX涉及的陡峭學習曲線。他斷言：“ DEX體驗需要改進，”敦促開發人員簡化界面。他的坦率反映了在模因硬幣的波動中席捲的零售投資者中的更廣泛的挫敗感。

$1 Million Donation Plan

100萬美元捐贈計劃

Following a university student's philanthropic drive that inspired CZ's initial $100,000 contribution, community feedback is now guiding his pledge to donate $1 million (157 BNB) to meme coin victims.

在一名大學生的慈善活動激發了CZ最初的100,000美元捐款之後，社區反饋現在指導他承諾向Meme Coin受害者捐款100萬美元（157 BNB）。

Quickly dismissing direct payouts to individuals due to the difficulty in verifying identities, he said, "Focus on community-wide actions," redirecting the conversation toward scalable solutions.

他說，由於難以驗證身份的困難，迅速將直接支付給個人，他說：“專注於社區範圍的行動”，將對話重定向到可擴展的解決方案。

Meanwhile, suggestions poured in on social media, with proposals ranging from partnerships with non-profits to token burns or investments in liquidity pools. Throughout the discussions, CZ has emphasised the importance of transparency, demanding that recipient organisations adopt blockchain-trackable disbursement methods. "Funds must reach end beneficiaries visibly," he insisted, aligning with his recent trends in crypto-backed charity.

同時，建議在社交媒體上湧入，提議從與非營利組織的合作夥伴關係到代幣的燒傷或對流動性池的投資。在整個討論中，CZ都強調了透明度的重要性，要求接受者組織採用可區塊鏈跟踪的支付方法。他堅持說：“資金必須明顯地達到最終的受益人。”

Transparency Demands in Charity Discussions

慈善討論中的透明度要求

CZ's criteria for beneficiaries prioritise accountability, narrowing the options to crypto-enabled non-profits. "Tracking mechanisms are non-negotiable," he stated, echoing calls for auditable fund flows. While some supporters advocate token burns to boost asset values, others champion liquidity pools, a method CZ personally tested.

CZ對受益人的標準優先考慮問責制，從而縮小了支持加密的非營利組織的選項。他說：“跟踪機制是不可談判的。”儘管一些支持者主張代幣燃燒以提高資產價值，而另一些支持者則支持流動性庫，但CZ親自測試了一種方法。

However, scepticism persists. Critics argue that token burns offer only fleeting value, while liquidity pools carry the risk of being used for market manipulation. On the other hand, donations to non-profits face logistical challenges, including the need for regulatory compliance. Undeterred, CZ hinted at a possible hybrid model. "Portions could go to vetted charities; others might fuel liquidity," he said, blending idealism with pragmatism.

但是，懷疑主義仍然存在。評論家認為，令牌燃燒只提供短暫的價值，而流動性池則具有用於市場操縱的風險。另一方面，向非營利組織的捐款面臨後勤挑戰，包括需要進行監管合規性。 CZ未經避免，暗示了可能的混合模型。他說：“部分可能會流向審查的慈善機構；其他人可能會助長流動性。”他將理想主義與實用主義融合在一起。

Liquidity Pool Tests

流動性池測試

Experiments with liquidity pools have influenced CZ's stance on fund deployment. After an initial clumsy attempt, he came to appreciate their potential. "Liquidity pools indirectly reward communities," he said, downplaying any profit motives. Yet technical barriers remain.

使用流動性池的實驗影響了CZ對基金部署的立場。經過最初的笨拙嘗試，他開始欣賞他們的潛力。他說：“流動性池間接獎勵社區。”然而，技術障礙仍然存在。

Wallet operators flagged the complexities of airdrops, anticipating disputes over eligibility if tokens were to be distributed broadly.

錢包操作員標記了空調的複雜性，如果要大規模分發令牌，則預計有資格的爭議。

CZ agreed, calling airdrops a "steep mountain" due to the gaps in verification. Instead, he suggested liquidity injections or strategic burns as alternatives to avoid logistical nightmares. Notably, he confirmed that the donated BNB would not remain in his possession, assuring stakeholders of an impartial execution.

CZ同意，由於驗證的差距，AirDrops稱AirDrops為“陡峭的山”。取而代之的是，他建議注射流動性或戰略性燃燒作為避免後勤噩夢的替代方法。值得注意的是，他確認捐贈的BNB不會保留在他的財產中，從而確保利益相關者公正地處決。

Meme Coin Fallout

模因硬幣輻射

CZ's ordeal highlights a pressing dilemma: crypto's promise of decentralisation often clashes with usability. Beginners must navigate opaque systems, while the whimsical volatility of meme coins leaves investors vulnerable. His donation initiative, while remedial, spotlights the industry's need for safeguards.

CZ的磨難突出了一個緊迫的困境：加密貨幣的權力下放的承諾通常與可用性發生衝突。初學者必須瀏覽不透明的系統，而模因硬幣的異想天開的波動使投資者脆弱。他的捐款倡議雖然得到補救，但仍關注該行業對保障措施的需求。

Meanwhile, developers face mounting pressure to enhance DEX designs. "Error messages must clarify, not confuse," CZ urged, advocating intuitive upgrades. As the debates rage, one truth emerges: crypto's growth hinges on balancing innovation with empathy. For now, CZ's $1 million plan offers a blueprint for community-centric crisis response, if executed transparently.

同時，開發人員面臨著增強DEX設計的不斷增長的壓力。 CZ敦促說：“錯誤消息必須澄清而不是混淆。”提倡直觀的升級。隨著辯論的憤怒，一個真理的出現：加密貨幣的成長取決於平衡創新與同理心的平衡。目前，如果透明執行，CZ的100萬美元計劃為以社區為中心的危機響應提供了藍圖。

As Binance's founder navigates the meme coin chaos, his dual role as industry leader and accidental DEX novice reminds stakeholders: even experts grapple with crypto's complexities.

當Binance的創始人駕駛Meme Coin Chaos時，他作為行業領導者的雙重角色和偶然的DEX新手提醒利益相關者：甚至專家也努力應對加密貨幣的複雜性。