机器人破坏了PI Network的社区情绪吗？

PI Network对CoinMarketCap的社区情感民意测验今天大幅下降，导致了机器人活动的指控。负票蜂拥而至该网站的民意调查

Pi Network’s community sentiment poll on CoinMarketCap has fallen dramatically today, leading to allegations of bot activity. Negative votes swarmed the site’s poll, while other community ratings stayed positive.

PI Network关于CoinMarketCap的社区情感民意调查今天已经大大减少，导致了机器人活动的指控。负票蜂拥而至该网站的民意调查，而其他社区收视率保持积极。

However, there is no clear proof either for or against these claims. Pi Network has suffered criticism and price setbacks recently, and its supporters have swayed polls, votes, and ratings on multiple occasions.

但是，对这些主张或反对这些主张都没有明确的证据。 PI Network最近受到了批评和价格挫折，其支持者多次浪费了民意调查，投票和评分。

Did Bots Sabotage Pi Network’s Community Sentiment?

机器人破坏了PI Network的社区情绪吗？

Since its launch on February 20, Pi Network has seen more than its share of controversies. Critics have attacked its accessibility, governance, transparency, and more, and multiple governments have called it a scam.

自2月20日推出以来，PI Network的争议超出了它的争议。批评家攻击了其可及性，治理，透明度等，多个政府称其为骗局。

Today, however, Pi supporters raised concerns about bot activity on CoinMarketCap after the token’s community sentiment plummeted:

但是，如今，PI支持者对CoinMarketCap的机器人活动提出了担忧，因为令牌社区情绪暴跌：

“It looks like somebody is using bots to vote against PI. I am 99% sure this is not an organic poll. Over 1.94 Million votes is even bigger than the BTC vote. 77% of the PI community is bullish on CoinGecko. Why is it so different on CoinMarketCap?” a Pioneer asked on social media.

“看来有人在使用机器人对PI投票。我99％的人确定这不是有机民意调查。超过194万票甚至比BTC投票更大。77％的PI社区对Coingecko看涨。为什么在CoinmarketCap上如此不同？”社交媒体上问的先锋。

Specifically, this user noted that Pi’s community sentiment plunged 90% in less than a day and that this poll had more participants than Bitcoin’s.

具体而言，该用户指出，PI的社区情绪在不到一天的时间内就跌落了90％，并且该民意调查的参与者比比特币更多。

Other platforms with a similar voting mechanism kept Pi’s rating steady, leading him to conclude that bot activity was involved.

具有类似投票机制的其他平台使PI的评级保持稳定，这使他得出结论，涉及机器人活动。

It’s very difficult to assess the veracity of these Pi Network bot allegations for several reasons. First of all, the token’s price has suffered dramatically this week.

由于几个原因，很难评估这些PI网络机器人指控的真实性。首先，代币的价格本周遭受了巨大的影响。

Many users lost huge sums of Pi tokens after the KYC migration deadline, and massive investor sell-offs have triggered a price rout. Some of this negative sentiment may be genuine.

在KYC迁移截止日期之后，许多用户损失了大量的PI代币，大量投资者抛售引发了价格溃败。这种负面情绪中的一些可能是真实的。

Additionally, it’s interesting that CoinMarketCap is the only platform involved in the Pi Network bot voting allegations. The firm refused to acknowledge Pi as one of the largest tokens by market cap, but it eventually relented.

此外，有趣的是，CoinMarketCap是PI网络机器人投票指控的唯一平台。该公司拒绝承认PI是按市值计算的最大的代币之一，但最终却放弃了。

Either the platform or its community could bear resentment towards Pi after these setbacks.

在这些挫折之后，平台或其社区都可以对PI抱有怨恨。

Furthermore, the community does have a reputation for vote brigading. Bybit’s CEO has repeatedly criticized Pi, and the token’s supporters review-bombed the Bybit app in response. They did a similar practice with Binance after the exchange delayed a Pi listing.

此外，社区确实以投票符号而闻名。拜比特（Bybit）的首席执行官反复批评了PI，而代币的支持者对Bybit App的评论作了回应。在交易所推迟了PI上市后，他们以Binance进行了类似的练习。

Ultimately, it seems very unlikely that disgruntled Pi supporters or committed haters spiked this poll without any bot activity. The negative votes came in absurdly fast, were isolated to one platform, and exceeded the votes for even the largest cryptoassets.

归根结底，心怀不满的PI支持者或承诺的仇恨似乎不太可能在没有任何机器人活动的情况下刺激了这项民意调查。负票的速度非常快，被隔离到一个平台上，甚至超过了最大的加密货币选票。

As of now, it remains challenging to find definitive proof either way.

截至目前，找到确定的证据仍然很具有挑战性。