機器人破壞了PI Network的社區情緒嗎？

PI Network對CoinMarketCap的社區情感民意測驗今天大幅下降，導致了機器人活動的指控。負票蜂擁而至該網站的民意調查

Pi Network’s community sentiment poll on CoinMarketCap has fallen dramatically today, leading to allegations of bot activity. Negative votes swarmed the site’s poll, while other community ratings stayed positive.

PI Network關於CoinMarketCap的社區情感民意調查今天已經大大減少，導致了機器人活動的指控。負票蜂擁而至該網站的民意調查，而其他社區收視率保持積極。

However, there is no clear proof either for or against these claims. Pi Network has suffered criticism and price setbacks recently, and its supporters have swayed polls, votes, and ratings on multiple occasions.

但是，對這些主張或反對這些主張都沒有明確的證據。 PI Network最近受到了批評和價格挫折，其支持者多次浪費了民意調查，投票和評分。

Did Bots Sabotage Pi Network’s Community Sentiment?

機器人破壞了PI Network的社區情緒嗎？

Since its launch on February 20, Pi Network has seen more than its share of controversies. Critics have attacked its accessibility, governance, transparency, and more, and multiple governments have called it a scam.

自2月20日推出以來，PI Network的爭議超出了它的爭議。批評家攻擊了其可及性，治理，透明度等，多個政府稱其為騙局。

Today, however, Pi supporters raised concerns about bot activity on CoinMarketCap after the token’s community sentiment plummeted:

但是，如今，PI支持者對CoinMarketCap的機器人活動提出了擔憂，因為令牌社區情緒暴跌：

“It looks like somebody is using bots to vote against PI. I am 99% sure this is not an organic poll. Over 1.94 Million votes is even bigger than the BTC vote. 77% of the PI community is bullish on CoinGecko. Why is it so different on CoinMarketCap?” a Pioneer asked on social media.

“看來有人在使用機器人對PI投票。我99％的人確定這不是有機民意調查。超過194萬票甚至比BTC投票更大。77％的PI社區對Coingecko看漲。為什麼在CoinmarketCap上如此不同？”社交媒體上問的先鋒。

Specifically, this user noted that Pi’s community sentiment plunged 90% in less than a day and that this poll had more participants than Bitcoin’s.

具體而言，該用戶指出，PI的社區情緒在不到一天的時間內就跌落了90％，並且該民意調查的參與者比比特幣更多。

Other platforms with a similar voting mechanism kept Pi’s rating steady, leading him to conclude that bot activity was involved.

具有類似投票機制的其他平台使PI的評級保持穩定，這使他得出結論，涉及機器人活動。

It’s very difficult to assess the veracity of these Pi Network bot allegations for several reasons. First of all, the token’s price has suffered dramatically this week.

由於幾個原因，很難評估這些PI網絡機器人指控的真實性。首先，代幣的價格本周遭受了巨大的影響。

Many users lost huge sums of Pi tokens after the KYC migration deadline, and massive investor sell-offs have triggered a price rout. Some of this negative sentiment may be genuine.

在KYC遷移截止日期之後，許多用戶損失了大量的PI代幣，大量投資者拋售引發了價格潰敗。這種負面情緒中的一些可能是真實的。

Additionally, it’s interesting that CoinMarketCap is the only platform involved in the Pi Network bot voting allegations. The firm refused to acknowledge Pi as one of the largest tokens by market cap, but it eventually relented.

此外，有趣的是，CoinMarketCap是PI網絡機器人投票指控的唯一平台。該公司拒絕承認PI是按市值計算的最大的代幣之一，但最終卻放棄了。

Either the platform or its community could bear resentment towards Pi after these setbacks.

在這些挫折之後，平台或其社區都可以對PI抱有怨恨。

Furthermore, the community does have a reputation for vote brigading. Bybit’s CEO has repeatedly criticized Pi, and the token’s supporters review-bombed the Bybit app in response. They did a similar practice with Binance after the exchange delayed a Pi listing.

此外，社區確實以投票符號而聞名。拜比特（Bybit）的首席執行官反复批評了PI，而代幣的支持者對Bybit App的評論作了回應。在交易所推遲了PI上市後，他們以Binance進行了類似的練習。

Ultimately, it seems very unlikely that disgruntled Pi supporters or committed haters spiked this poll without any bot activity. The negative votes came in absurdly fast, were isolated to one platform, and exceeded the votes for even the largest cryptoassets.

歸根結底，心懷不滿的PI支持者或承諾的仇恨似乎不太可能在沒有任何機器人活動的情況下刺激了這項民意調查。消極的選票迅速荒謬，被隔離到一個平台上，甚至超過了最大的加密貨物的選票。

As of now, it remains challenging to find definitive proof either way.

截至目前，找到確定的證據仍然很具有挑戰性。