韓國評論未註冊的加密平台的訪問限制

韓國當局正在審查未註冊加密平台的訪問限制。

South Korea's Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) is reviewing access restrictions for unregistered crypto platforms, Hankyung reported on March 21. The report came as the agency is inspecting exchanges that did not file as Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) under local law.

Hankyung於3月21日報導說，韓國金融情報部門（FIU）正在審查未註冊的加密平台的訪問限制。該報告是由該機構根據當地法律進行的，該報告檢查未作為虛擬資產服務提供商（VASP）提交的交易所。

Exchanges must register under the Specified Financial Information Act. Without this, they are classified as unregistered crypto exchanges and can face criminal and administrative penalties. The FIU is working with related agencies to identify platforms operating without approval.

交易所必鬚根據規定的財務信息法註冊。沒有這個，他們將被歸類為未註冊的加密交易所，並可能面臨犯罪和行政處罰。 FIU正在與相關機構合作，以識別未經批准的平台。

These actions expand on South Korea’s crypto regulations in recent years. The FIU is working with the Korea Communications Standards Commission to determine how to block access to unregistered exchanges.

近年來，這些行動對韓國的加密法規進行了擴展。 FIU正在與韓國通信標準委員會合作，以確定如何阻止對未註冊交流的訪問。

KuCoin South Korea Named in Compliance Probe

Kucoin韓國以合規調查命名

The FIU is focusing on exchanges providing services to South Korean users despite not registering as VASPs. The platforms offered Korean-language support and ran local marketing activities, which would place them under the VASP requirements.

FIU儘管沒有註冊為VASP，但仍在著重於為韓國用戶提供服務的交流。這些平台提供了韓語支持並進行了本地營銷活動，這將使它們符合VASP的要求。

KuCoin South Korea was named by Hankyung as one of the platforms being inspected by the FIU. A KuCoin representative told CoinChapter.com that the exchange is closely monitoring regulatory developments in all jurisdictions, including Korea.

Kucoin韓國被Hankyung命名為FIU檢查的平台之一。 Kucoin代表告訴Coinchapter.com，該交易所正在密切監視包括韓國在內的所有司法管轄區的監管發展。

“At KuCoin, we believe that compliance is essential for the healthy and sustainable growth of the crypto industry—this has always been our stance and will continue to guide us as we move forward. We remain committed to supporting the industry’s long-term development through proactive and responsible practices.”

“在Kucoin，我們認為合規性對於加密行業的健康和可持續增長至關重要 - 這一直是我們的立場，並將繼續指導我們，隨著我們的前進，我們仍然致力於通過積極主動和負責任的實踐來支持該行業的長期發展。”

The statement did not confirm whether KuCoin South Korea had filed any documentation with local regulators. The FIU is still considering further actions, including access blocks.

該聲明沒有確認韓國是否已向當地監管機構提交任何文件。 FIU仍在考慮進一步的操作，包括訪問塊。

Unregistered Crypto Exchanges Face Legal Consequences

未註冊的加密交換面臨法律後果

Under current South Korean crypto regulations, companies involved in crypto trading, custody, or management must report to the FIU. If exchanges fail to meet these requirements, authorities classify them as unregistered and impose legal consequences.

根據目前的韓國加密法規，參與加密貨幣，監護或管理層的公司必須向FIU報告。如果交易所無法滿足這些要求，當局將將其歸類為未註冊並施加法律後果。

An FIU official confirmed that consultations are ongoing. The Korea Communications Standards Commission is assessing the process for limiting access to platforms on the FIU’s list.

FIU官員確認正在進行諮詢。韓國通信標準委員會正在評估限制FIU列表中對平台的訪問的過程。

The list of exchanges has not been disclosed yet. However, local sources say that multiple platforms, including large global exchanges, are being inspected.

交流清單尚未披露。但是，當地消息人士稱，正在檢查包括大型全球交流在內的多個平台。

Bithumb Investigation Highlights Scrutiny of Local Exchanges

Bithumb調查突出了當地交流的審查

On March 20, prosecutors launched an investigation into Bithumb after suspecting that its former CEO Kim Dae-sik misused company funds to buy an apartment in Seoul. Authorities are checking for any violations of financial laws.

3月20日，檢察官懷疑其前首席執行官Kim Dae-Sik濫用公司資金在首爾購買公寓後，對Bithumb進行了調查。當局正在檢查是否違反財務法。

Bithumb stated that Kim repaid the amount using a personal loan. The investigation is ongoing, and no charges have been filed yet.

Bithumb表示，Kim使用個人貸款償還了這筆款項。調查正在進行中，尚未提出任何指控。

Additionally, questions were raised about listing fees. Anonymous sources also told Wu Blockchain that some projects paid large sums to secure listings on Upbit and Bithumb. These claims mentioned intermediaries allegedly collecting millions of dollars from projects for these listings.

此外，提出了有關上市費用的問題。匿名消息人士還告訴WU區塊鏈，有些項目付了大筆款項，以確保Upbit和Bithumb上的清單。這些主張提到中介機構據稱從這些列表中收集了數百萬美元。

Following these reports, Upbit responded to the assertions and asked Wu Blockchain to disclose the names of the digital assets involved in the alleged listing fee payments. Upbit stated that it has never collected any funds from projects for listing their tokens on its exchange.

在這些報告之後，Upbit回應了主張，並要求Wu區塊鏈披露所謂的上市費用涉及的數字資產的名稱。 Upbit表示，它從未從項目中收集任何資金來列出其在交易所上的令牌。

The company also noted that it does not have any plans to take legal action regarding the report.

該公司還指出，它沒有任何就報告採取法律行動的計劃。