美國的證券交易委員會（SEC）最近撤回了針對Coinbase的訴訟，標誌著加密貨幣世界的重要時刻。

這一事件提出了重要的問題：它代表了加密貨幣監管的轉折點，還是僅僅是政治捐贈的結果？

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has recently withdrawn its lawsuit against Coinbase, marking a significant moment for the world of cryptocurrencies.

美國證券交易委員會（SEC）最近撤回了針對Coinbase的訴訟，標誌著加密貨幣世界的重要時刻。

This event raises important questions: does it represent a turning point in the regulation of cryptocurrencies, or is it simply the result of political donations?

這一事件提出了重要的問題：它代表了加密貨幣監管的轉折點，還是僅僅是政治捐贈的結果？

Details of the SEC decision regarding the Coinbase crypto case

SEC關於Coinbase Crypto案的決定的詳細信息

The SEC has closed its case against Coinbase and has also completed investigations into Robinhood Crypto and Uniswap Labs.

SEC已關閉了針對Coinbase的案件，還完成了對Robinhood Crypto和Uniswap Labs的調查。

This series of withdrawals occurred in a market decline context, with Bitcoin experiencing a 20% reduction in its value, dropping from a peak of $109,114 to $87,000.

這一系列提款發生在市場下降的情況下，比特幣的價值降低了20％，從109,114美元的峰值下降到87,000美元。

The decision of the SEC comes at a time of uncertainty, where investors show a clear preference for stability and greater market predictability.

SEC的決定是在不確定性的時候出現的，在這種情況下，投資者對穩定性和更大的市場可預測性表現出明顯的偏愛。

Pod Presidentsko Trumpov, which saw significant returns from the cryptocurrency community in the form of donations, the question arises whether these SEC actions are motivated by a genuine willingness to embrace cryptocurrency.

POD總統特朗普夫（Pod Trumpov）以捐贈的形式獲得了加密貨幣社區的大量回報，問題是這些SEC行動是否是出於真正願意接受加密貨幣的動機而引起的。

Or if they are influenced by political compensations. Coinbase, Robinhood, and Uniswap have contributed to a crypto super PAC, called Fairshake, with a value of $116 million, raising doubts about the impartiality of regulatory decisions.

或者，如果它們受到政治賠償的影響。 Coinbase，Robinhood和Uniswap為一個名為Fairshake的加密超級PAC做出了貢獻，價值為1.16億美元，對監管決策的公正性產生了疑問。

Designation by the CFTC or change of position by the SEC

CFTC指定或SEC的位置更改

The position of the SEC on tokens as securities has been a point of friction, indicating the possible classification of most tokens as securities.

SEC在令牌上作為證券的位置是摩擦的點，表明大多數令牌可能將大多數令牌分類為證券。

This scenario could change with a possible intervention by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which might take on a less aggressive and more collaborative role, thus favoring the industry.

這種情況可能會隨著商品期貨交易委員會（CFTC）的干預而改變，該委員會可能會扮演不那麼積極和更合作的角色，從而有利於該行業。

The adoption of stablecoins could drive the growth of crypto payments, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (PMI).

採用Stablecoins可以推動加密支付的增長，特別是對於中小型企業（PMI）。

It is essential that there exists a clear legislative framework that recognizes stablecoin as a legitimate means of payment, thus increasing trust and opportunities for US companies in the bull and bear cryptocurrency sector.

至關重要的是，存在一個明確的立法框架，將斯塔布爾幣視為合法的付款方式，從而增加了公牛和熊加密貨幣部門的信任和機會。

The challenges that crypto companies face in opening bank accounts are significant, often due to the perception of high money laundering risks.

加密公司在開放銀行帳戶中面臨的挑戰通常是由於人們對大量洗錢風險的看法。

An intervention by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) could change this perception, facilitating access to banking services for entities linked to cryptocurrencies.

金融犯罪執法網絡（FINCEN）的干預可能會改變這種看法，從而促進與加密貨幣相關的實體獲得銀行服務的訪問。

Towards the Future of Cryptocurrencies in the USA

緻美國加密貨幣的未來

In other words, the path of cryptocurrencies in the United States remains uncertain.

換句話說，美國的加密貨幣道路仍然不確定。

By monitoring the actions of the CFTC and FinCEN, as well as any positive changes in cryptocurrency regulation, one can gain a clearer view of the Trump administration’s attitude towards this sector.

通過監視CFTC和Fincen的行動，以及加密貨幣監管的任何積極變化，人們可以更清楚地了解特朗普政府對該部門的態度。

The answer to these questions could reveal the true intentions of the Trump presidency regarding the regulation of cryptocurrencies in the country.

這些問題的答案可以揭示特朗普總統關於該國加密貨幣的規定的真正意圖。

In conclusion, while the decision of the SEC to drop the case against Coinbase might seem like a victory for the cryptocurrency sector, it is essential to remain vigilant and consider all the political and regulatory implications that this action might entail.

總之，儘管SEC決定對Coinbase進行案件的決定似乎是加密貨幣部門的勝利，但必須保持警惕並考慮這一行動可能需要的所有政治和監管意義。