|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JAN3 執行長 Samson Mow 在最近接受 MicroStrategy 創辦人 Michael Saylor 採訪時表示,後者表示他不相信
JAN3 CEO Samson Mow has commented on a recent interview with MicroStrategy founder Michael Saylor, where Saylor expressed his doubts that the US government could confiscate BTC.
JAN3 執行長 Samson Mow 對 MicroStrategy 創辦人 Michael Saylor 最近接受的訪談發表了評論,其中 Saylor 表達了他對美國政府可能沒收 BTC 的懷疑。
Saylor also criticized OG Bitcoiners and those who prefer to hold their private keys to Bitcoin wallets, arguing that their concerns about BTC being confiscated from public custodians one day, like gold was in the 1930s, are unfounded.
Saylor 也批評了OG 比特幣持有者和那些更願意持有比特幣錢包私鑰的人,認為他們對BTC 有一天會像20 世紀30 年代的黃金一樣被公共託管人沒收的擔憂是沒有根據的。
Gold was confiscated in 1933 "voluntarily"
1933年黃金被「自願」沒收
Mow pointed to executive order 6102, which was issued by US President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933 to limit private gold ownership in the country. At the time, the dollar was still pegged to gold. US citizens were given the option to voluntarily turn in their gold or face a fine of $10,000 or ten years in prison (or both).
繆指出,美國總統富蘭克林·羅斯福於 1933 年頒布了第 6102 號行政命令,旨在限制該國私人黃金所有權。當時,美元仍與黃金掛鉤。美國公民可以選擇自願交出黃金,否則將面臨 10,000 美元的罰款或十年監禁(或兩者兼而有之)。
People brought in their gold and were paid $20.37 per ounce. This was done to help the Federal Reserve print more dollars during the Great Depression as it had more gold to back them with. However, the official reason was to stop people from hoarding gold.
人們帶入黃金並獲得每盎司 20.37 美元的報酬。這樣做是為了幫助聯準會在大蕭條期間印製更多美元,因為它有更多的黃金來支持它們。然而,官方的原因是為了阻止人們囤積黃金。
In a recent interview, Michael Saylor argued that gold was not confiscated and that people turned it in of their own free will. He said that when the gold was collected, Roosevelt changed the value of gold in terms of USD, making one ounce now worth $35 rather than the $20.37 it had been before.
在最近的一次採訪中,邁克爾·塞勒 (Michael Saylor) 辯稱,黃金並沒有被沒收,而是人們自願上繳的。他說,當黃金被收集起來時,羅斯福改變了以美元計價的黃金價值,使一盎司現在價值 35 美元,而不是之前的 20.37 美元。
Paranoid crypto anarchists shall inherit the Earth.
偏執的加密無政府主義者將繼承地球。
Saylor went on to say that the fears of many OG Bitcoiners about the US government confiscating BTC in the future from public custodians are groundless as, back in 1933, the US was on the gold standard and now it is not on the Bitcoin standard. He called these Bitcoiners “paranoid crypto anarchists”, who are against governments and taxes.
Saylor 繼續表示,許多OG 比特幣愛好者對美國政府未來從公共託管人手中沒收BTC 的擔憂是毫無根據的,因為早在1933 年,美國就實行金本位制,而現在卻不再實行比特幣本位制。他稱這些比特幣支持者為“偏執的加密無政府主義者”,他們反對政府和稅收。
Executive Order 6102 for Bitcoin: Samson Mow
針對比特幣的第 6102 號行政命令:Samson Mow
However, Samson Mow countered that history may still repeat itself and the government does not necessarily have to confiscate Bitcoin physically. It can just “lock custodial BTC into approved custodians forever,” he said, “and call it ‘institutional Bitcoin’”.
然而,Samson Mow 反駁說,歷史可能仍會重演,政府不一定要沒收實體比特幣。他說,它可以「將託管比特幣永遠鎖定在批准的託管人手中,並稱之為『機構比特幣』」。
“And then it can drive the price of that Bitcoin lower by decreasing its utility,” Mow added. He said that while the US is not technically backed by Bitcoin, the government still has an incentive “to degrade and attack Bitcoin” because they can print dollars forever and BTC with its limited supply goes against this.
「然後它可以透過降低比特幣的效用來壓低比特幣的價格,」Mow 補充道。他表示,雖然美國在技術上沒有比特幣的支持,但政府仍然有「貶低和攻擊比特幣」的動機,因為他們可以永遠印製美元,而供應有限的比特幣則與此背道而馳。
Executive Order 6102 didn't "confiscate" gold in the same way "no one was forced to get the mRNA shot."
6102 號行政命令並沒有像「沒有人被迫接受 mRNA 注射」那樣「沒收」黃金。
A government doesn't need to physically confiscate your #Bitcoin. It can just lock custodial BTC into approved custodians forever, aka "Institutional Bitcoin." And then it can…
政府不需要沒收你的#Bitcoin。它可以將託管 BTC 永遠鎖定在經過批准的託管人手中,即「機構比特幣」。然後它可以…
免責聲明:info@kdj.com
所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!
如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。
-
- 人們被敦促仔細檢查他們的零錢,尋找一枚罕見的 2 英鎊硬幣,上面有古希臘神話和傳說中的標誌性場景
- 2024-10-22 22:30:01
- 有相當多「著名」的稀有英國硬幣,現在很多人都知道它們價值不菲
-
- 民主黨能否擊敗共和黨在佛羅裡達州眾議院的絕對多數?
- 2024-10-22 22:30:01
- 這是黨團會議必須實現的目標,否則將面臨在塔拉哈西荒野中再待兩年的風險。