羅斯·烏爾布里希特（Ross Ulbricht

羅斯·烏爾布里希特（Ross Ulbricht）或有接觸錢包的人只是意外地削減了派遣給他的普通幣的價格，同時試圖在Raydium上提供流動性。

A series of technical errors in cryptocurrency trading led to a $12 million loss for wallets linked to former Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht, according to Arkham Intelligence.

根據Arkham Intelligence的說法，與前絲綢之路創始人羅斯·烏爾布里希特（Ross Ulbricht）有關的錢包的一系列技術錯誤導致了1200萬美元的損失。

The wallets, which were verified by the crypto analysis firm as being listed on the FreeRoss.org donation site, initially held 50% of the total supply of ROSS tokens.

該錢包已由加密分析公司（Crypto Analysis）驗證為在Freeross.org捐贈現場上市，最初佔Ross令牌總供應量的50％。

These tokens were created as a show of support for Ulbricht following his release from prison, where he had served 11 years for money laundering and drug trafficking conspiracies.

這些令牌是為了支持Ulbricht從監獄獲釋後的支持，在那裡他因洗錢和販毒的陰謀而服役11年。

The first error occurred when the wallet controller attempted to provide liquidity on the Raydium platform. Instead of creating a Concentrated Liquidity Market Maker (CLMM) pool, which allows traders to set specific prices, they mistakenly set up a Constant-Product Market Maker (CPMM) pool.

當錢包控制器試圖在Raydium平台上提供流動性時，就會發生第一個錯誤。他們沒有創建集中的流動性營銷商（CLMM）池，該池允許交易者設定特定的價格，而是錯誤地建立了恆定產品的營銷商（CPMM）池。

This initial mistake resulted in approximately 5% of the ROSS token supply being made available at prices far below market value. A Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) bot quickly identified the opportunity and purchased 398.6 million tokens, worth about $1.5 million at regular market prices, for just $556.

最初的錯誤導致大約5％的羅斯令牌供應以遠低於市場價值的價格提供。最大的可提取價值（MEV）機器人迅速確定了這一機會，併購買了3.986億個代幣，價值約150萬美元，以常規市場價格為150萬美元，僅為556美元。

The situation worsened when the wallet controller made a second attempt to add single-sided liquidity. This subsequent error led to roughly 35% more of the total ROSS supply being sold at unfavorable prices. The same MEV bot capitalized on this mistake, selling the acquired tokens for 2,669 SOL (approximately $643,000).

當錢包控制器第二次嘗試增加單面流動性時，情況惡化了。隨後的錯誤導致以不利的價格出售的Ross總供應量大約增加了35％。同樣的MEV機器人在此錯誤上大寫了，以2,669 SOL（約合643,000美元）出售了被收購的令牌。

The combined errors resulted in a dramatic 90% price drop for the ROSS token, with values falling from $0.039 SOL to $0.0036 SOL per token within just two hours.

合併的錯誤導致羅斯令牌的價格下降了90％，價值從0.039美元的SOL下降到每種令牌的0.0036元溶膠。

The trading volume for ROSS tokens showed increased activity following the incident, reaching $508,270 after a 24% surge in trading activity. This suggests ongoing market interest despite the price volatility.

事件發生後，羅斯令牌的交易量顯示出活動的增加，在交易活動激增24％後達到508,270美元。這表明儘管價格波動，但仍在進行市場興趣。

Currently, the Ulbricht-linked wallets retain approximately 10% of the total ROSS token supply, valued at around $200,000. This represents a substantial decrease from their initial 50% holding.

目前，與Ulbricht相關的錢包保留了大約10％的Ross令牌供應量，價值約20萬美元。這與最初的50％持有相比大幅下降。

The ROSS token has shown remarkable recovery since the incident. Within 24 hours of the price crash, the token experienced a 735% increase in value, reaching a trading price of $0.0104.

自事件發生以來，羅斯令牌已顯示出了顯著的康復。在價格崩潰後的24小時內，令牌價值增加了​​735％，達到了0.0104美元的交易價格。

The trading volume has also expanded considerably, reaching $14.8 million as investors responded to the market movement.

交易量也大大增加了，隨著投資者對市場的反應，交易量達到1480萬美元。

The MEV bot’s successful exploitation of the situation demonstrates the automated nature of cryptocurrency markets, where programs constantly scan for trading opportunities and can execute transactions instantly when they identify pricing discrepancies.

MEV機器人對這種情況的成功開發表明了加密貨幣市場的自動性質，該計劃不斷掃描交易機會，並在確定定價差異時可以立即執行交易。

This incident highlights the technical complexities involved in cryptocurrency trading, particularly in managing liquidity pools and understanding different market-making mechanisms.

該事件突出了加密貨幣交易所涉及的技術複雜性，尤其是在管理流動性池和了解不同的營銷機制方面。

The error occurred specifically on the Raydium platform, a decentralized exchange operating on the Solana blockchain, which offers different types of liquidity pools for traders.

該錯誤發生在Raydium Platform上，Raydium Platform是在Solana區塊鏈上運行的分散交換，該交易鍊為交易者提供了不同類型的流動性池。

The mistake shows how critical it is to understand the distinction between different types of liquidity pools – CPMM and CLMM – as they operate under different pricing mechanisms and can lead to vastly different trading outcomes.

錯誤表明，了解不同類型的流動性池（CPMM和CLMM）之間的區別是多麼關鍵，因為它們在不同的定價機制下運行，並可能導致截然不同的交易成果。

The incident has drawn attention from the cryptocurrency community, serving as a reminder of the importance of technical knowledge in digital asset trading.

該事件引起了加密貨幣社區的關注，這提醒了技術知識在數字資產交易中的重要性。