Rosen 律師事務所提醒 Coinbase Global, Inc. 證券的購買者註意重要的證券集體訴訟首席原告截止日期為 2024 年 11 月 12 日

紐約，2024 年11 月3 日（環球通訊社）—原因：全球投資者權利律師事務所Rosen Law Firm 提醒投資者在2021 年4 月14 日至7 月25 日期間購買Coinbase Global, Inc.（納史達克股票代碼：COIN）的證券2024 年，包括這兩個日期（「集體訴訟期間」），是公司首次提起的證券集體訴訟中主要原告的重要截止日期 2024 年 11 月 12 日。

A securities class action lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of purchasers of Coinbase Global, Inc. (NASDAQ: COIN) securities, against the Company, certain of its officers, and the underwriters of the Company’s April 2021 initial public offering, alleging violations of the Securities Act of 1933. If you suffered a loss on your Coinbase securities, you have until November 12, 2024 to apply to be appointed lead plaintiff.

代表 Coinbase Global, Inc.（納斯達克股票代碼：COIN）證券購買者向美國紐約南區地方法院提起針對該公司、其某些管理人員和承銷商的證券集體訴訟該公司2021 年4 月首次公開募股，指控違反1933 年《證券法》。

According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) in 2020, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) had deemed efforts by Coinbase’s British unit, CB Payments Limited (“CBPL”), to prevent criminals from using its platform, to be inadequate; (2) as a result, the FCA reached an agreement with CBPL, which put requirements in place that were designed to prevent high risk customers from using CBPL’s platform; (3) CBPL then breached that agreement, which resulted in 13,416 high risk individuals receiving services; (4) the foregoing resulted in an undisclosed heightened regulatory risk; and (5) as a result, defendants statements about its business, operations and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

根據該訴訟，被告在整個集體訴訟期間做出了重大虛假和/或誤導性陳述和/或未能披露：(1) 2020 年，英國金融行為監管局（“FCA”）認為Coinbase 英國子公司所所做的努力CB Payments Limited（「CBPL」）在防止犯罪者利用其平台方面力度不夠； (2) 因此，FCA 與 CBPL 達成協議，提出了旨在防止高風險客戶使用 CBPL 平台的要求； (3) CBPL隨後違反了該協議，導致13,416名高風險個人接受了服務； (4) 上述導致未揭露的監理風險加大； (5) 因此，被告關於其業務、營運和前景的陳述在所有相關時間均存在重大虛假和誤導性和/或缺乏合理依據。當真實的細節進入市場後，訴訟稱投資者蒙受了損失。

The complaint alleges that the Offering Documents were materially false and misleading and omitted to state material facts necessary in order to make the statements not misleading because they failed to disclose, among other things, that:

訴狀稱，發行文件存在重大虛假和誤導性，並且省略了陳述必要的重要事實，以使這些陳述不具有誤導性，因為除其他外，它們未能披露以下內容：

Coinbase’s British unit, CB Payments Limited (“CBPL”), had not taken adequate steps to prevent criminals from using its platform, prompting the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) to impose restrictions on CBPL in 2020. Specifically, the FCA required CBPL to take steps to prevent “high-risk” customers from using its platform. However, CBPL breached the agreement with the FCA, which resulted in 13,416 high-risk individuals receiving services from CBPL in violation of the agreement.

Coinbase 的英國子公司CB Payments Limited（「CBPL」）並未採取足夠的措施來防止犯罪者使用其平台，促使金融行為監理局（「FCA」）在2020 年對CBPL 施加限制。 CBPL採取措施防止「高風險」客戶使用其平台。然而，CBPL 違反了與 FCA 的協議，導致 13,416 名高風險個人違反協議接受了 CBPL 的服務。

The foregoing caused Coinbase to face heightened regulatory risk, which was not disclosed to investors.

上述情況導致 Coinbase 面臨更高的監管風險，但此風險並未向投資者揭露。

As a result, the Offering Documents’ statements about Coinbase’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, Coinbase investors suffered damages.

因此，發行文件中有關 Coinbase 業務、營運和前景的陳述在所有相關時間均存在重大虛假和誤導性和/或缺乏合理依據。當真實的細節進入市場時，Coinbase 投資者遭受了損失。

To join the Coinbase class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=28116 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email case@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action.

若要加入 Coinbase 集體訴訟，請造訪 https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=28116 或致電 Phillip Kim 先生。有關集體訴訟的信息，請撥打免費電話 866-767-3653 或發送電子郵件至 case@rosenlegal.com。

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than November 12, 2024. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

集體訴訟已經提起。如果您希望擔任主要原告，您必須在 2024 年 11 月 12 日之前向法院提出動議。

WHY ROSEN LAW? We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation.

為什麼選擇羅森法？我們鼓勵投資者選擇具有領導角色成功記錄的合格律師。通常，發出通知的公司沒有類似的經驗、資源或任何有意義的同儕認可。其中許多公司實際上並未提起證券集體訴訟，而只是推薦客戶或與實際提起訴訟的律師事務所合作的中間人。明智地選擇顧問。羅森律師事務所代表全球投資者，專注於證券集體訴訟和股東派生訴訟。

Rosen Law Firm has achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors.

羅森律師事務所針對中國公司達成了有史以來規模最大的證券集體訴訟和解協議。羅森律師事務所在ISS 證券集體訴訟服務公司2017 年證券集體訴訟和解數量排名中名列第一。美元。光是 2019 年，該公司就為投資者籌集了超過 4.38 億美元的資金。

In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs’ Bar. Many of the firm’s attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

2020 年，創始合夥人勞倫斯羅森 (Laurence Rosen) 被 law360 評為「原告律師協會泰坦」。本所多位律師均獲得Lawdragon和Super Lawyers的認可。

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) in 2020, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) had deemed efforts by Coinbase’s British unit, CB Payments Limited (“CBPL”), to prevent criminals from using its platform, to be inadequate; (2) as a result, the FCA reached an agreement with CBPL, which put requirements in place that were designed to prevent high risk customers from using CBPL’s platform; (3) CBPL then breached that

案件詳情：根據訴訟，被告在整個集體訴訟期間做出了重大虛假和/或誤導性陳述和/或未能披露：(1) 2020 年，英國金融行為監管局 (“FCA”) 認為Coinbase 的英國子公司CB Payments Limited（「CBPL」）為防止犯罪者使用其平台所做的努力不夠充分； (2) 因此，FCA 與 CBPL 達成協議，提出了旨在防止高風險客戶使用 CBPL 平台的要求； (3) CBPL 隨後違反了