流氓演員從以太坊錢包“ borntoolate.eth”進行的流氓演員對烏瑪進行了治理攻擊

一位從以太坊錢包“ Borntoolate.eth”運營的流氓演員對Polymarket使用的決策Oracle進行了治理攻擊，以攻擊以烏克蘭為主題合同的結果，成為UMA代幣的最大持有人之一。

A rogue actor operating from an Ethereum wallet 'BornTooLate.Eth' has engaged in a governance attack on UMA, a decision-making oracle used by Polymarket, to impact the outcome of a Ukraine-themed contract by becoming one of the largest holders of UMA tokens.

一位從以太坊錢包“ borntoolate.eth”運營的流氓演員對Polymarket使用的決策Oracle進行了治理攻擊，以影響烏克蘭主題合同的結果，以成為UMA代幣的最大持有人之一。

UMA is a decentralized “optimistic” oracle protocol that resolves disputes in prediction markets by allowing UMA token holders to vote on contentious outcomes. It has faced its share of controversy for resolving disputed markets, such as Barron Trump's involvement in a Presidential meme coin, the nature of 'finding' the OceanGate submarine, and Venezuela's contested election, drawing criticism due to subjective decisions that frustrated certain market participants.

烏瑪（Uma）是一個分散的“樂觀”甲骨文協議，通過允許烏馬令牌持有者對有爭議的結果進行投票，可以在預測市場中解決爭議。它在解決有爭議的市場方面面臨著爭議，例如巴倫·特朗普（Barron Trump）參與總統模因硬幣，“尋找”海門潛艇的性質，以及委內瑞拉的有爭議的選舉，由於主觀的批評而引起了批評，這使某些市場參與者感到沮喪。

On-chain data shows that BornTooLate.eth has approximately 1.3 million UMA tokens, making them a top-5 governance staker and giving them significant sway over the resolution of UMA disputes.

鏈上的數據表明，BornToolate.ETH擁有約130萬個UMA令牌，使其成為前5名的治理Staker，並在UMA爭端的決議方面具有重大影響。

In the case of this Ukraine-themed market that was attacked, the contract asked bettors to speculate on the possibility of a deal being signed by the end of March that would grant the U.S. access to the country's rare earth resources.

如果遭到襲擊的烏克蘭主題市場，該合同要求投注者推測在3月底之前簽署的交易可能使美國獲得該國稀有地球資源的可能性。

A deal is in the works, reports say, but nothing has been signed. And yet on Polymarket, it resolved to 'yes' after BornTooLate.Eth used his staked UMA tokens to vote 'yes' on the resolution.

報導說，這筆交易正在進行中，但沒有簽署。然而，在Polymarket上，它在Borntoolate之後決定“是”。 Eth用他固定的UMA代幣對該決議投票“是”。

A Very Unprofitable Trading Strategy

一個非常無利可圖的交易策略

Curiously, this attack doesn't seem to have netted a large payday for any of the participants.

奇怪的是，這次攻擊似乎並沒有為任何參與者帶來巨大的發薪日。

Market data from on-chain curator Polymarket Analytics shows that the largest winner from the contract took home just over $55,000.

來自鏈策展人Polmoarket Analytics的市場數據表明，合同中最大的贏家賺了55,000美元以上。

Likewise, the losses were quite moderate compared to other closely-watched Polymarket contracts with the biggest loser forfeiting around $73,000.

同樣，與其他觀看的多頭市場合同相比，最大的失敗者被沒收約73,000美元，損失也非常適度。

An etherscan page for BornTooLate.Eth shows that the actor began accumulating UMA tokens over a year ago. Given his holdings of over 1.3 million tokens, building that sort of treasury for the attack would have cost over $2 million.

Ethertoolate.ETH的Etherscan頁面表明，演員一年多以前開始積累UMA令牌。鑑於他擁有超過130萬個代幣的持有，為這次襲擊而建造這種財政部將耗資超過200萬美元。

For its part, Polymarket says no refunds will be issued because this isn't a "market failure" and said in a statement on Discord it is working with the UMA oracle team to prevent it from happening again.

Polymarket表示，將不退款，因為這不是“市場失敗”，並在與Uncord的一份聲明中說，它正在與Uma Oracle團隊合作，以防止它再次發生。

"This market resolved against the expectations of our users and our clarification," a spokesperson posted on Discord. "We’re committed to building the future of prediction markets, which requires building resilient systems in which everyone can trust."

一位發言人在Discord上發布了一位發言人：“這個市場與我們的用戶的期望和澄清有關。” “我們致力於建立預測市場的未來，這需要建立每個人都可以信任的彈性系統。”

Polymarket founder Shayne Coplan didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

Polymarket創始人Shayne Coplan沒有立即回應置評請求。