著名的XRP社區人物wrathofkahneman最近解決了回扣功能的問題

該聲明強調了XRP的分散性質和法規彈性。討論是在對數字資產和合規機制進行持續審查之後

Renowned XRP community figure WrathofKahneman recently addressed the issue of clawback functionality on the XRP Ledger (XRPL), clarifying a distinction between XRP and other issued tokens, including RLUSD.

著名的XRP社區人物wrathofkahneman最近在XRP Ledger（XRPL）上解決了回扣功能的問題，闡明了XRP與包括RLUSD在內的其他標記之間的區別。

In a post on X, he stated, “Remember, XRP cannot be clawed back. Other tokens issued on the XRPL can include clawback functionality, but it’s not mandatory. For example, RLUSD requires clawback capability to comply with regulations, but never XRP.”

他在X上的一篇文章中說：“請記住，XRP不能被撤回。 XRPL上發出的其他代幣可能包括回扣功能，但這不是強制性的。例如，RLUSD需要回扣能力才能遵守法規，但從未遵守XRP。”

This statement underscores XRP’s decentralized nature and regulatory resilience. The discussion follows ongoing scrutiny of digital assets and compliance mechanisms in the evolving regulatory landscape.

該聲明強調了XRP的分散性質和法規彈性。討論是在不斷發展的監管格局中對數字資產和合規機制的持續審查之後。

XRP and Clawback Functionality

XRP和回扣功能

The term “clawback” refers to a feature that allows issuers to reclaim tokens under certain conditions, typically to comply with regulatory requirements. While this function is an option for assets issued on the XRPL, it does not apply to XRP itself.

“回扣”一詞是指允許發行人在某些條件下收回令牌的功能，通常以符合法規要求。儘管此功能是XRPL上發出的資產的選項，但它不適用於XRP本身。

One prominent example is Ripple’s stablecoin, RLUSD, which, according to WrathofKahneman, includes the clawback feature for regulatory compliance. This aligns with Ripple’s broader focus on institutional-grade solutions and adherence to legal frameworks.

一個突出的例子是Ripple的Stablecoin Rlusd，根據Wrathofkahneman的說法，它包括調節符合性的回扣功能。這與Ripple更加關注機構級解決方案和遵守法律框架相吻合。

Community members reacted to this clarification, with X user Mentallect@X369 emphasizing the legal expertise behind Ripple’s operations. He noted, “Ripple’s legal compliance team is world-class. XRP being the ‘banker’s coin’ isn’t an insult. RLUSD is the most compliant, audited, collateral-backed & audited stablecoin on Earth. When the Great Crypto Purge happens, XRP & RLUSD will be viewed as safe haven digital assets.”

社區成員對此澄清做出了反應，X用戶Mentallect@x369強調了Ripple運營背後的法律專業知識。他指出：“ Ripple的法律合規團隊是世界一流的。 XRP是“銀行家的硬幣”並不是侮辱。 RLUSD是地球上最合規，審計，背包支持和審計的Stablecoin。當出現大加密貨幣清除時，XRP和RLUSD將被視為避風港數字資產。”

This perspective highlights the perception that XRP and RLUSD could emerge as secure options amid potential regulatory crackdowns on non-compliant digital assets.

這種觀點強調了XRP和RLUSD在不合規數字資產上的潛在監管鎮壓中，XRP和RLUSD可能會出現的看法。

Commodity Status and Decentralization

商品地位和權力下放

Another user, aixrp, echoed WrathofKahneman’s sentiments, adding, “correct. xrp is a commodity with no issuer, making clawbacks impossible. rlusd, as a stablecoin, needs clawback for regulatory compliance. xrp remains clawback-free, ensuring its unique utility and decentralization.”

另一個用戶AIXRP回應了Wrathofkahneman的觀點，並補充說：“正確。 XRP是沒有發行人的商品，使回扣不可能。 Rlusd作為一個穩定的人，需要奪回法規合規性。 XRP仍然沒有回扣，確保了其獨特的實用性和權力下放。”

This statement reinforces the notion that XRP’s classification as a commodity distinguishes it from issued tokens like RLUSD. Without an issuer, there is no central authority with the power to reclaim XRP from holders, strengthening its decentralization.

該聲明加強了XRP將其分類為商品的觀念將其與像RLUSD這樣的發行代幣區分開來。沒有發行人，就沒有中央權力，有權從持有人那里奪回XRP，從而加強其權力下放。

Broader Implications for XRP Holders

對XRP持有人的更廣泛影響

The discussion reflects the XRP community’s awareness of the asset’s positioning in regulatory discourse. The inability to claw back XRP adds to its appeal as a digital asset independent of centralized control.

討論反映了XRP社區對資產在監管話語中的定位的認識。無法抓住XRP的縮減增加了其獨立於集中控制的數字資產的吸引力。

Meanwhile, RLUSD’s compliance measures position it as a stablecoin that aligns with regulatory standards, making it a potential option for institutions seeking a compliant digital asset.

同時，RLUSD的合規性將其定位為與監管標准保持一致的Stablecoin，這使其成為尋求合規數字資產的機構的潛在選擇。

The distinction between XRP and issued tokens on the XRPL becomes crucial as the cryptocurrency industry navigates increasing oversight. The community’s response highlights the legal safeguards built into RLUSD and the fundamental characteristics that maintain XRP’s decentralization.

隨著加密貨幣行業導航監督的增加，XRP與XRPL上發行的代幣之間的區別變得至關重要。該社區的回應突出了RLUSD內置的法律保障措施以及維持XRP權力下放的基本特徵。