Morpho記錄以太坊DAPP中每週最高的交易量

根據Dappradar在4月22日發布的數據，Morpho在以太坊分散應用程序（DAPPS）中記錄了每週交易量最高。

According to data released by DappRadar on April 22, Morpho has recorded the highest weekly transaction volume among Ethereum decentralized applications (DApps). Over the seven days, the lending protocol handled $39.57 billion, edging out Uniswap V3, which posted $36.72 billion.

根據Dappradar在4月22日發布的數據，Morpho在以太坊分散應用程序（DAPPS）中記錄了每週交易量最高。在七天內，貸款協議處理了395.7億美元，並淘汰了Unistwap V3，該V3的票價為367.2億美元。

TOP #ETHEREUM DAPPS BY WEEKLY VOLUME #Morpho #UniswapV3 #Sky #Balancer #CoWSwap #UniswapV4 #1inch #Curve #UniswapV2 #Pendle pic.twitter.com/RvLviq5Jtl

最佳#Ethereum dapps按每週卷#morpho＃uniswapv3 #sky #sky #balancer #cowswap＃uniswapv4＃1inch #curve＃uniswapv2 #pendle pic.twitter.com/rvlviq5jtl

With just 1,770 unique active wallets (UAW) and a total balance of $1.05 billion, Morpho’s output reflects a high activity concentration among a limited number of participants. In contrast, Uniswap V3 reported 33,000 UAW and held a larger balance of $1.51 billion. This gap in wallet activity and liquidity emphasizes the efficiency of Morpho’s usage and suggests heightened borrowing or lending activity within the platform.

Morpho的產出僅為1,770個獨特的活動錢包（UAW），總餘額為10.5億美元，反映了有限數量的參與者的活動濃度。相比之下，UNISWAP V3報告了33,000 UAW，並擁有15.1億美元的餘額。錢包活動和流動性的這種差距強調了morpho用法的效率，並建議在平台內提高借貸或貸款活動。

Sky Leads in Liquidity But Trails in Volume

天空引發流動性，但體積卻落後

Sky, a lesser-known project within the Ethereum DApp ecosystem, claimed the highest total balance among all ranked platforms at $3.55 billion. However, it placed third in weekly transaction volume, processing $2.97 billion. Sky’s active wallet count was also among the lowest, with just 486 wallets interacting with the protocol over the week. The disparity between its liquidity and usage volume indicates utilized capital or low-frequency high-value transactions.

Sky是Ethereum Dapp生態系統中鮮為人知的項目，在所有排名平台的總餘額中，Sky是35.5億美元的總餘額。但是，它在每週交易量中排名第三，處理29.7億美元。 Sky的主動錢包數量也是最低的，一周內只有486個錢包與協議相互作用。其流動性和使用量之間的差異表明利用資本或低頻高價值交易。

Balancer followed closely with $2.88 billion in volume, while CoW Swap posted $2.44 billion. Both protocols maintained moderate balances and active wallet figures, signaling use than top-ranking DApps.

Balancer緊隨其後的是28.8億美元的數量，而Cow交換的價格為24.4億美元。兩種協議都保持中等餘額和有效的錢包數字，而不是頂級DAPP的信號使用。

Uniswap V4 Sees Highest Wallet Activity

UNISWAP V4看到最高的錢包活動

Uniswap V4, a recent iteration of the Uniswap protocol, demonstrated strong user engagement. It recorded the highest active wallets across all listed DApps, reaching 53,350 during the week.

UNISWAP V4是UNISWAP協議的最新迭代，證明了強大的用戶參與度。它記錄了所有列出的DAPP中最高的活動錢包，在一周中達到53,350。

While Uniswap V4 occupies the top in the number of wallets, the platform occupied the 6th place in terms of the total volume of transactions, which reached $ 1.15 billion. It shows relatively many users, presumably for checking or infrequent orders, but it hardly rivals prior protocol versions’ peak introduction rates.

雖然Uniswap V4在錢包數量中佔最高，但該平台在交易總量上排名第六，達到11.5億美元。它顯示了相對較多的用戶，大概是用於檢查或不頻繁的訂單，但幾乎與先前協議版本的峰值介紹率相關。

1inch, another Ethereum-based DApp, posted $884.52 million in weekly volume while engaging 29,470 unique wallets. Both metrics’ numbers are in the mid-range, indicating consistent activity among decentralized exchange users and aggregators.

1英寸的另一個基於以太坊的DAPP的每週售價為8.8452億美元，同時吸引了29,470個獨特的錢包。這兩個指標的數字都處於中間距離，表明分散的交換用戶和聚合器之間的活動一致。

Curve, Uniswap V2, and Pendle closed out the top ten rankings, each reporting less than $300 million in transaction volume. Curve stood out with the lowest wallet count of all listed protocols, at 392, even though its balance neared $300 million. Uniswap V2 and Pendle also displayed low engagement and throughput compared to newer or more actively used alternatives.

Curve，Uniswap V2和Pendle結束了前十名，每個排名都不到3億美元的交易量。曲線在所有列出的協議中的錢包數量最低，即392，儘管其餘額接近3億美元。與更新或更積極使用的替代方案相比，Uniswap V2和Pendle的參與度和吞吐量也很低。

It emerged that there were some protocols with little wallet count handling billions in volume while others with vast wallets got little or low activity. They indicate shifting consumer tendencies in decentralized finance where fewer protection groups could potentially complete larger worths and efficiency might compensate for scarce or no interaction.

出現的是，有些方案很少，錢包數量很少，而其他錢包龐大或低的活動則進行了數十億美元的處理。它們表明在分散的金融中改變了消費者的趨勢，更少的保護小組可能可以完成更大的價值，效率可能會彌補稀缺或沒有互動。

The ranks remain focused on how significant differences in the performance of decentralized finance protocols can be found even within the same network. Though Morpho took total volume, Uniswap V4’s wallet activity and Sky speak of one kind of dominance in each measure.

這些等級仍集中在分散融資協議的性能上如何在同一網絡中找到分散的財務協議的顯著差異。儘管Morpho的總卷為單位，但Uniswap V4的錢包活動和天空在每種措施中都說一種主導地位。