模因硬幣是主流的

像19世紀的野生石油繁榮一樣，模因硬幣將數字交易者變成了現代的投機者。

Like the wild oil booms of the 19th century, meme coins have turned digital traders into modern-day speculators. Previously, prospectors poured fortunes into unproven wells hoping to strike it rich, only to end up bankrupt when the land was dry. Similarly, meme coin purchasers are risking thousands of dollars hoping they will turn into millions.

像19世紀的野生石油繁榮一樣，模因硬幣將數字交易者變成了現代的投機者。以前，探礦者將命運倒入未經證實的井中，希望能夠富裕，直到土地干燥時最終破產。同樣，模因硬幣購買者冒著數千美元的風險，希望他們能變成數百萬美元。

These cryptocurrencies are created mostly as jokes, parodies, or to capitalize on internet and pop culture, now known as memes. Unlike traditional cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Ether, which assert intrinsic value or utility, meme coins are often launched without any real purpose or long-term vision. A meme coin will rely on humor, viral trends, or the popularity of internet figures to gain attention. Most are launched with nothing more than a silly name and a hyped-up narrative, yet they manage to attract billions of dollars from speculative traders. What many fail to realize, however, is that the game is often rigged before they even place their bets.

這些加密貨幣主要是作為笑話，模仿或利用互聯網和流行文化（現在稱為模因的笑話）創建的。與傳統的加密貨幣（如比特幣或以太幣）那樣，它主張內在的價值或效用，Meme硬幣通常是沒有任何實際目的或長期願景的。模因硬幣將依靠幽默，病毒趨勢或互聯網數字的普及來引起關注。大多數人的推出只不過是一個愚蠢的名字和炒作的敘述，但他們設法吸引了投機性交易者數十億美元。但是，許多人沒有意識到的是，遊戲甚至在下注之前就經常被操縱。

For many, the $TRUMP token was their first introduction to memecoins and likely to cryptocurrencies in general, but these speculative assets have been around almost as long as Bitcoin itself. The first wave emerged in 2013 with Dogecoin ($DOGE), which began as a joke but quickly gained traction as an internet phenomenon. The cycle of speculation has remained consistent: a meme coin goes viral, early adopters and insiders profit from the hype, and latecomers are often left holding worthless tokens after the inevitable crash. The $TRUMP token’s explosive rise and steep decline in January 2025 followed this well-worn pattern, demonstrating once again how meme coins thrive on hype-driven volatility.

對於許多人來說，特朗普的代幣是他們首次對模因的介紹，並且一般來說是加密貨幣，但是這些投機性資產幾乎與比特幣本身一樣長。第一波在2013年出現了Dogecoin（$ Doge），這是一個開玩笑，但迅速成為互聯網現象。投機的周期一直保持一致：模因硬幣傳播開來，早期採用者和內部人士從炒作中獲利，而後來的人在不可避免的崩潰後通常會保留毫無價值的代幣。 $特朗普令牌在2025年1月的爆炸性上升和急劇下降之後，這種破壞的模式遵循了這種破舊的模式，這再次表明了模因如何在炒作驅動的波動性上蓬勃發展。

Unlike the crypto ICO craze of 2017-18, meme coins don’t provide any real utility and aren’t tokenized Securities. However, the one similar feature is allowing early investment before public release by a select few with connections and inside knowledge. Unlike traditional cryptocurrencies, the predictable nature of a meme coin, rapidly increasing in value over short periods of time before crashing, lures many speculators to try to “sell the top”. In the end, the only clear winners tend to be the ones close to the coin’s creator.

與2017-18的加密ICO熱潮不同，Meme硬幣沒有提供任何真正的效用，也不提供令牌化證券。但是，一個類似的功能是允許少數具有連接和內部知識的少數人在公開發布之前進行早期投資。與傳統的加密貨幣不同，模因硬幣的可預測性質，在崩潰之前的短時間內迅速增加價值，引誘許多投機者試圖“賣出頂部”。最後，唯一明確的贏家往往是靠近硬幣的創造者的贏家。

Meme coin popularity manages to thrive off the backs of many who didn’t sell fast enough. Many of these tokens are designed to benefit their creators the most, with developers and insiders secretly holding a large share of the total supply. Once enough investors buy in, these insiders cash out, causing the price to crash. Most liquidity pools are controlled by the creators, so they can pull out the funds at any time, further destabilizing that market.

模因硬幣的受歡迎程度設法擺脫了許多賣得不夠快的人的背部。這些代幣中的許多旨在使創作者受益最大，開發人員和內部人員秘密地佔據了總供應量的份額。一旦有足夠的投資者購買，這些內部人員就會兌現，導致價格崩潰。大多數流動性池都由創作者控制，因此他們可以隨時撤出資金，從而進一步破壞該市場的穩定。

What is most interesting, perhaps, is the seeming indifference that exists for what is essentially a rigged game. “Rug-pulling”, a term to describe the abandonment of the project by its creators, refers to "pulling the rug out from under" their investments. While there is no law on the books specifically concerning rug-pulling, most successful rug-pull ventures involve fraud, conspiracy, or other criminal acts. But the enforcement against such practices is vastly disproportionate to the volume of meme coins minted every day, especially when the creators are based in a different country than the investors. This is a widespread issue where sheer project volume and founder anonymity can facilitate such fraudulent activities within and across borders. The waters only get murkier when the very creator is a person of influence.

也許最有趣的是，對於本質上是一款操縱的遊戲而言，似乎存在漠不關心。描述其創作者放棄該項目的術語“地毯”是指“將地毯從下面拉出”他們的投資。雖然這些書中沒有專門針對地毯的法律，但大多數成功的地毯企業涉及欺詐，陰謀或其他犯罪行為。但是，針對這種做法的執法與每天鑄造的模因硬幣的數量非常不成比例，尤其是當創作者與投資者不同的國家不同時。這是一個普遍存在的問題，純粹的項目量和創始人匿名可以促進在邊界內部和跨境中的欺詐活動。水域只有在創造者是一個有影響力的人時才會變得更加模糊。

(Node: 3)

（節點：3）

iOS 18.3.2: Apple's Surprise iPhone Update Fixes 1 Bug, Adds 1 Frustration

iOS 18.3.2：蘋果的驚喜iPhone更新修復了1個錯誤，增加了1個挫敗感

A small-but-important iPhone update has arrived.

出現了小但重要的iPhone更新。

Apple released iOS 18.3.2 on Wednesday, a follow-up to the major iOS 18.3 update that arrived last month. As the numbering suggests, this is a minor update, focusing on fixing one bug and introducing one change that some users might find frustrating.

蘋果週三發布了iOS 18.3.2，這是上個月到來的主要iOS 18.3更新的後續。正如編號所暗示的那樣，這是一個較小的更新，重點是修復一個錯誤，並引入一些用戶可能會感到沮喪的更改。

The bug fix concerns an issue that could prevent iPhone users from receiving iMessages. According to Apple's release notes, this bug mainly affected iPhone SE (3rd generation) devices.

該錯誤修復涉及一個可以阻止iPhone用戶接收iMessages的問題。根據蘋果的發行說明，該錯誤主要影響iPhone SE（第三代）設備。

If you're an iPhone SE (3rd generation) user who was having trouble receiving iMessages, installing iOS 18.3.2 should hopefully resolve the issue.

如果您是iPhone SE（第三代）用戶，他在接收iMessages時遇到困難，則希望安裝iOS 18.3.2應該解決該問題。

Apple also noted that the update brings "improved system performance" and that it "includes additional bug fixes and stability improvements."

蘋果還指出，該更新帶來了“改進的系統性能”，並且“包括其他錯誤修復和穩定性改進”。

However, the one change in this update might be viewed negatively by some iPhone users.

但是，某些iPhone用戶可能會對此更新中的一個更改負面看法。

Apple has removed the option to disable setting a passcode on your iPhone. Previously, users could choose to have no passcode at all and rely solely on Face ID or Touch ID for device security.

Apple已刪除了禁用在iPhone上設置密碼的選項。以前，用戶可以選擇完全沒有密碼，而僅依靠面部ID或觸摸ID來進行設備安全。

Now, setting a passcode is mandatory, and users can only choose the time after which the passcode will be required.

現在，設置密碼是強制性的，用戶只能選擇需要密碼的時間。

This change likely comes in response to new regulations in certain regions, which mandate minimum security standards for devices used

這種變化可能是響應某些地區的新法規的響應，該法規要求使用的設備最低安全標準