Kangana Ranaut 的爭議主張：Subhash Chandra Bose 是印度第一位總理嗎？

在一次有爭議的採訪中，寶萊塢女演員坎加娜·拉瑙特聲稱印度第一任總理是蘇巴斯·錢德拉·博斯，而不是賈瓦哈拉爾·尼赫魯，引發了爭論。雖然拉瑙特承認尼赫魯是印度 1947 年獨立後的首任總理，但她認為博斯在二戰期間在日本建立了臨時政府，因此應該被視為首任總理。然而歷史學家指出，博斯的臨時政府並沒有得到英國政府或其他國家的承認，戰後他也沒有返回印度。

Kangana's Controversial Assertion: Subhash Chandra Bose as India's First Prime Minister

康加納有爭議的主張：蘇巴斯·錢德拉·鮑斯擔任印度第一任總理

Kangana Ranaut, known for her audacious statements, has once again sparked a public uproar with her recent remarks regarding India's history and the role of Subhash Chandra Bose. While campaigning for the upcoming Lok Sabha elections as a BJP candidate, Ranaut asserted that Bose was India's first Prime Minister, a claim contradicted by historical facts.

以其大膽言論而聞名的坎加納·拉瑙特（Kangana Ranaut）最近有關印度歷史和蘇巴什·錢德拉·鮑斯（Subhash Chandra Bose）角色的言論再次引發公眾軒然大波。在以印度人民黨候選人競選即將舉行的人民院選舉時，拉瑙特聲稱博斯是印度第一任總理，這一說法與歷史事實相矛盾。

In an interview with Navika Kumar at the Times Now summit, Ranaut defended her assertion by referring to Bose's leadership of the Azad Hind Fauj and the establishment of the provisional Azad Hind government in Japan during World War II. However, she incorrectly claimed that Bose was denied entry into India and verhindert from assuming the role of Prime Minister after Independence.

在Times Now 峰會上接受納維卡·庫馬爾(Navika Kumar) 採訪時，拉瑙特為自己的主張辯護，提到了博斯(Bose) 對Azad Hind Fauj 的領導以及二戰期間日本臨時Azad Hind 政府的建立。然而，她錯誤地聲稱博斯被拒絕進入印度，維欣德特在獨立後無法擔任總理。

Ranaut's statement has drawn widespread criticism and scrutiny from historians and political commentators. It is a well-documented fact that Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru was elected as India's first Prime Minister after Independence in 1947, and that Bose died in a plane crash in 1945.

拉瑙特的言論引起了歷史學家和政治評論家的廣泛批評和審視。有據可查的事實是，潘迪特·賈瓦哈拉爾·尼赫魯(Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru) 於1947 年當選為印度獨立後的首任總理，博斯(Bose) 於1945 年死於飛機失事。

Bose's legacy as a freedom fighter and nationalist is widely recognized, but his role in the Indian independence movement is distinct from that of Nehru and the Indian National Congress. Bose's Azad Hind Fauj fought alongside the Japanese Imperial Army against British rule, while Nehru and the Congress pursued constitutional and non-violent means to achieve Independence.

博斯作為自由鬥士和民族主義者的遺產得到了廣泛認可，但他在印度獨立運動中的作用與尼赫魯和印度國大黨的作用截然不同。博斯的阿札德·欣德·福吉與日本皇軍並肩作戰，反抗英國的統治，而尼赫魯和國會則尋求憲法和非暴力手段來實現獨立。

Ranaut's attempt to rewrite history and undermine the contributions of Nehru and the Congress has been met with skepticism and outrage. Critics have accused her of distorting facts and using historical inaccuracies to support her political agenda.

拉瑙特試圖改寫歷史並破壞尼赫魯和國大黨的貢獻，遭到了懷疑和憤怒。批評者指責她歪曲事實並利用歷史錯誤來支持她的政治議程。

The Indian Youth Congress, a youth wing of the Congress party, has called Ranaut's statement a "gaffe" and demanded an apology. Srinivas BV, the National President of the Indian Youth Congress, shared a clip of Ranaut's interview on Twitter, highlighting her erroneous claim about Bose being India's first Prime Minister.

國大黨的青年派別印度青年大會稱拉瑙特的言論是“失態”，並要求其道歉。印度青年大會全國主席斯里尼瓦斯·BV在推特上分享了拉瑙特的採訪片段，強調了她關於博斯是印度首任總理的錯誤說法。

Ranaut's remarks have also raised concerns about the spread of misinformation and the erosion of historical knowledge in India. Critics argue that her statements could confuse and mislead the younger generation, who may not be familiar with the intricacies of India's independence movement.

拉瑙特的言論也引發了人們對印度錯誤訊息傳播和歷史知識侵蝕的擔憂。批評者認為，她的言論可能會混淆和誤導年輕一代，他們可能不熟悉印度獨立運動的複雜性。

Moreover, Ranaut's comments have reignited debates about the role of historical figures in modern India and the need for accuracy in public discourse. Some commentators have questioned whether Ranaut's deliberate distortion of history is a dangerous trend that could undermine national unity and trust in public institutions.

此外，拉瑙特的言論重新引發了關於歷史人物在現代印度的作用以及公共話語準確性的必要性的爭論。一些評論家質疑拉瑙特故意扭曲歷史是否是一種危險趨勢，可能會破壞國家團結和對公共機構的信任。

As a political candidate seeking public office, Ranaut has a responsibility to present accurate information and engage in informed discussions. Her unsubstantiated claims and historical inaccuracies have damaged her credibility and raised questions about her fitness for public service.

作為一個尋求公職的政治候選人，拉瑙特有責任提供準確的資訊並參與知情的討論。她未經證實的說法和歷史錯誤損害了她的可信度，並引發了人們對她是否適合擔任公共服務的質疑。

The public backlash against Ranaut's statement serves as a reminder of the importance of historical accuracy and the need for responsible public discourse. It is essential that politicians, media personalities, and public figures exercise due diligence in their statements and avoid spreading misinformation or distorting historical facts for political gain.

公眾對拉瑙特聲明的強烈反對提醒人們歷史準確性的重要性以及負責任的公共話語的必要性。政治家、媒體人士和公眾人物在其言論中應盡職盡責，避免為了政治利益而散佈錯誤訊息或歪曲歷史事實，這一點至關重要。