Bitget首席執行官Gracy Chen批評Hypliquid對果凍代幣事件的處理

Hyperliquid對果凍代幣事件的處理引起了Bitget首席執行官Gracy Chen的批評。

Gracy Chen, the chief executive officer of Bitget, has sharply criticized Hyperliquid’s handling of the JELLY token incident.

Bitget的首席執行官Gracy Chen嚴厲批評了Hyplliquid對果凍代幣事件的處理。

After Hyperliquid (HYPE) removed JELLY amid an estimated $10.6 million loss and a looming liquidation threat to its treasury, Chen labeled the decentralized exchange’s actions as “immature, unethical, and unprofessional.”

在超流動性（Hype）去除果凍之後，據估計損失了1,060萬美元的損失和對財政部的迫在眉睫的清算威脅，陳將分散交易所的行為標記為“不成熟，不道德和不專業”。

Hyperliquid delisted the token with a promise to compensate impacted users. However, Chen argued that the losses and how the situation was handled raise questions about the exchange’s integrity.

超級流動性使代幣脫穎而出，並承諾補償受影響的用戶。但是，陳認為，損失以及如何處理局勢提出了有關交易所完整性的問題。

The Bitget chief executive criticized the team for operating the DEX “like an offshore centralized exchange with no know-your-customer or anti-money-laundering checks.”

BITGET首席執行官批評該團隊操作DEX，“就像沒有知識客戶或反罰款支票的海上集中式交流。”

She pointed this out in a post on X, adding:

她在X上的帖子中指出了這一點，並補充說：

“Despite presenting itself as an innovative decentralized exchange with a bold vision, Hyperliquid operates more like an offshore CEX with no KYC/AML, enabling illicit flows and bad actors.”

“儘管以大膽的願景表現為一種創新的分散交流，但Hyperliqu的運作更像是一個沒有KYC/AML的離岸CEX，可以使非法流動和不良演員。”

As such, Chen opined that Hyperliquid’s behavior may point towards an “FTX 2.0”, a reference of the collapsed crypto exchange FTX, which imploded in 2022 with millions of users impacted.

因此，Chen認為超流動性的行為可能指向“ FTX 2.0”，這是倒塌的加密交易所FTX的引用，該引用於2022年爆炸，數百萬用戶受到影響。

Arthus Hayes, the founder and former CEO of derivatives exchange BitMEX, also shared similar take via X.

衍生物交換Bitmex的創始人兼前首席執行官Arthus Hayes也通過X共享了類似的用處。

$HYPE can’t handle the $JELLYLet’s stop pretending hyperliquid is decentralised And then stop pretending traders actually give a fuck Bet you $HYPE is back where is started in short order cause degens gonna degen

$ hype無法處理$ jellylet的停止假裝超流動性被分散了，然後停止假裝交易者實際上給你打個bet你$ hype $ hype又回來了

Hyperliquid halted the jellyjelly market after a $5 million short bet by a trader got liquidated, throwing the platform into controversy amid a seemingly coordinated pump scheme.

在交易員被清算了500萬美元的短期下注之後，Hypliquid停止了果膠市場，這使該平台在看似協調的泵計劃中引起了爭議。

The sharp surge in JELLY price, saw a 230% rally within an hour, which left the Hyperliquid liquidity pool with a $10.6 million loss. A further spike would have exploded this to over $240 million. Hyperliquid’s validator set chose to delist the token before this, citing “suspicious market activity.”

果凍價格的急劇增長，在一個小時內就達到了230％的集會，這使超稀疏的流動性池虧損了1,060萬美元。進一步的尖峰將爆炸到超過2.4億美元。 Hyperliquid的驗證器套裝選擇在此之前將其貼上象徵性，理由是“可疑的市場活動”。

Chen commented:

陳評論：

“The decision to close the $JELLY market and force-settle open positions at a favorable price sets a dangerous precedent. Trust—not capital—is the foundation of any exchange (CEX and DEX alike), and once lost, it’s nearly impossible to recover.”

“決定以有利的價格關閉$果凍市場和力量開放式職位，這是一個危險的先例。信託而不是資本是任何交易所的基礎（CEX和DEX都一樣），一旦丟失，幾乎不可能恢復。”

Rather than criticizing the delisting, Chen went on to highlight what she called “alarming flaws” in the DEX’s design. Among these are systemic risk to users as a result of mixed vaults, and unmixed vault positions, and also unrestricted position sizes, which she said has opened it up to manipulation.

Chen並沒有批評Deasting，而是繼續強調了她在Dex設計中所謂的“令人震驚的缺陷”。其中，由於混合的保險庫，未混合的金庫位置以及不受限制的位置大小，對用戶的系統風險是全身風險，她說這已經為操縱而開放。

“Unless these issues are addressed,” she noted, “more altcoins may be weaponized against Hyperliquid—putting it at risk of becoming the next catastrophic failure in crypto.”

她指出：“除非解決這些問題，否則可以將更多的山寨幣武器武器化，以防止過度流動性，以使其有可能成為加密貨幣中下一次災難性失敗的風險。”

Earlier this month, blockchain sleuth ZachXBT disclosed that a Hyperliquid whale who made huge high-leverage short bets on the DEX was indeed a cybercriminal who was using stolen funds.

本月初，區塊鏈Sleuth Zachxbt透露，在DEX上進行了巨大的高槓桿短賭注的一條高液鯨確實是一個使用被盜資金的網絡犯罪分子。

The HYPE token plunged double digits in the aftermath of the incident.

在事件發生後，炒作象徵下降了雙位。