以太坊聯合創始人Vitalik Buterin認為是應用層，而不是基礎設施層，該項目需要“良好的社會哲學”

該應用程序層是開發人員在以太坊的基礎基礎架構之上構建分散應用程序的地方，以及他們對這些程序的運作方式做出決定。

In a comment on the social media platform Warpcast, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin argued that it’s Ethereum’s application layer, not its infrastructure layer, that needs “good social philosophy” the most.

以太坊聯合創始人維塔克·布特林（Vitalik Buterin）在對社交媒體平台戰線的評論中說，最需要“良好的社會哲學”的以太坊的應用層，而不是其基礎設施層。

The app layer is where developers build decentralized applications on top of Ethereum’s base infrastructure and where they make decisions about how these programs operate. These programs are then used by the broader crypto community.

該應用程序層是開發人員在以太坊的基礎基礎架構之上構建分散應用程序的地方，以及他們對這些程序的運作方式做出決定。然後，更廣泛的加密社區使用這些程序。

In an April 12 post on the social media platform Warpcast, Buterin was responding to a user’s argument that Ethereum needs a new generation of developers to be brought in and infused with the spirit of the founders to renew itself. He argued that it’s the app layer that needs this more.

在4月12日的社交媒體平台Warpcast上的一篇文章中，Buterin回應了用戶的論點，即以太坊需要新一代的開發人員被帶入並註入創始人的精神才能續簽本身。他認為，更多需要的是應用程序層。

“Apps are 80% special purpose. What apps we have depends heavily on what ideas people had of what Ethereum apps, and Ethereum as a whole, are there to do for the world. And so having good ideas on this topic out there becomes crucially important,” Buterin said.

“應用程序是80％的特殊用途。我們在很大程度上取決於人們對以太坊應用程序和整個以太坊的想法，為世界做了什麼。因此，對這個話題有好主意變得至關重要，” Buterin說。

In comparison, Buterin says a programming language like C++ may not be as influenced by the creator’s ideology, as it is a general-purpose tool that doesn’t have much surface to be made worse or improved by social philosophy.

相比之下，布特林說，像C ++這樣的編程語言可能不會受到創造者意識形態的影響，因為它是一種通用工具，沒有太多的表面可以使社會哲學變得更糟或改善。

“Imagine that C++ had been made by a totalitarian racist fascist. Would it be a worse language? Probably not. It would still be a useful tool, and people could use it for good or bad purposes in about equal measure. But if it had been made worse, it would be because of the totalitarian racist fascist’s incompetence, not his malice.

“想像一下，C ++是由極權主義的種族主義法西斯主義者製造的。這是一種更糟糕的語言嗎？可能不是。它仍然是一個有用的工具，人們可以在同樣的情況下將其用於好或壞的目的。但是，如果變得更糟，那將是因為極權種族主義的法西斯主義者的無能，而不是他的惡意。

Ethereum’s layer 1 is similar to an extent, argued Buterin, although it is more exposed to philosophical influence, citing its move to proof-of-stake (PoS) and supporting light clients as examples.

Buterin認為，以太坊的第1層與某種程度相似，儘管它更受哲學影響，理由是它的舉動轉向了驗證（POS），並支持輕客戶作為例子。

“Someone who doesn’t believe in decentralization would not add light clients, or good forms of account abstraction. Someone who doesn’t mind energy waste would not spend half a decade moving to PoS, but the Ethereum Virtual Machine opcodes might have been roughly the same either way. So Ethereum is perhaps 50% general-purpose.

“一個不相信權力下放的人不會增加光明的客戶或良好的帳戶抽象形式。不介意能源浪費的人不會花五年的時間搬到POS，但是以太坊虛擬機opcodes可能以大致相同。因此，以太坊可能是50％的通用通用。

Apps with good social philosophy vs bad

具有良好社會哲學與壞的應用程序

In a follow-up post, Buterin told a user that in his opinion, crypto privacy protocol Railgun, Web3 social protocol Farcaster, decentralized prediction market Polymarket and messenger app Signal are examples of apps that have a good social philosophy.

在後續文章中，布特林告訴用戶，他認為，加密隱私協議Railgun，Web3社交協議Farcaster，分散的預測市場PolyMarket和Messenger App Signal是具有良好社會理念的應用程序的示例。

“You build apps that do the right thing behind the scenes by default. Signal is a reasonably good example of this, although it has significant flaws of its own. Farcaster is also a good example of this.

“您構建默認情況下在幕後做正確的應用程序的應用程序。信號是一個相當好的例子，儘管它具有其自身的重大缺陷。Farcaster也是一個很好的例子。

On the other hand, Buterin said that the memecoin platform Pump.fun, the collapsed crypto ecosystem Terra, its native token LUNA, and the collapsed crypto exchange FTX are examples of bad social philosophy.

另一方面，Buterin表示，Memecoin Platform泵。 FUN，倒塌的加密生態系統Terra，其原始的令牌Luna和倒塌的Crypto Exchange FTX是不良社會哲學的例子。

“The differences in what the app does stem from differences in beliefs in developers’ heads about what they are here to accomplish.

“該應用程序所做的事情的差異源於開發人員對他們在這裡完成的工作的看法的差異。