隨著投資者撤回上訴，馬斯克的狗狗幣法律戰結束

該案尋求 2580 億美元的賠償，於 2024 年 8 月被駁回，美國地區法官阿爾文·海勒斯坦 (Alvin Hellerstein) 裁定馬斯克的推文和公開聲明過於模糊，不構成證券欺詐。

A federal lawsuit accusing Elon Musk of manipulating the price of Dogecoin has ended after investors withdrew their appeal.

在投資者撤回上訴後，一項指控馬斯克操縱狗狗幣價格的聯邦訴訟已經結束。

The case, which sought $258 billion in damages, was dismissed in August 2024, with U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein ruling that Musk’s tweet and public statements were too vague to constitute securities fraud.

該案尋求 2580 億美元的賠償，於 2024 年 8 月被駁回，美國地區法官阿爾文·海勒斯坦 (Alvin Hellerstein) 裁定馬斯克的推文和公開聲明過於模糊，不構成證券欺詐。

Investors alleged that Musk’s actions, including his appearance on “Saturday Night Live,” were timed to benefit his financial interests at their expense.

投資人聲稱，馬斯克的行為，包括他出現在《週六夜現場》中，都是為了自己的經濟利益而犧牲自己的經濟利益。

🚨 BREAKING: Lawsuit accusing Elon Musk of rigging $DOGE ends as investors drop their appeal and legal motions. pic.twitter.com/zpMa2foJQ5

🚨 突發事件：隨著投資者放棄上訴和法律動議，指控埃隆馬斯克操縱 $DOGE 的訴訟結束。 pic.twitter.com/zpMa2foJQ5

— Cointelegraph (@Cointelegraph) November 15, 2024

- Cointelegraph (@Cointelegraph) 2024 年 11 月 15 日

Investors initially accused Musk of market manipulation and securities fraud. They claimed that his appearance on “Saturday Night Live” and other public statements led to significant financial losses for them.

投資者最初指責馬斯克操縱市場和證券詐欺。他們聲稱他出現在“週六夜現場”和其他公開聲明中給他們帶來了重大的經濟損失。

As the case progressed, investors shifted their focus to insider trading and deliberate price manipulation. They alleged that Musk’s social media activity directly influenced Dogecoin’s market fluctuations and that he used his status to artificially inflate the price for personal gain.

隨著案件的進展，投資者將注意力轉向內線交易和故意操縱價格。他們聲稱，馬斯克的社群媒體活動直接影響了狗狗幣的市場波動，並且他利用自己的地位人為抬高價格以謀取個人利益。

Both parties filed a stipulation on November 15, 2024, to drop their respective appeals and legal motions in federal court, effectively ending the dispute. This decision follows the judge’s earlier dismissal of the investors’ claims and their attempts to sanction Musk’s legal team for alleged interference during the appeal process.

雙方於 2024 年 11 月 15 日提交協議，放棄各自向聯邦法院提出的上訴和法律動議，從而有效結束了糾紛。在此決定之前，法官早些時候駁回了投資者的索賠，並試圖制裁馬斯克的法律團隊，指控其在上訴過程中乾涉。

Musk’s legal representative maintained that the lawsuit was based on inconsistent theories and was an attempt to extort a quick payout.

馬斯克的法律代表堅稱，該訴訟是基於不一致的理論，是為了快速敲詐勒索。

The conclusion of this litigation coincides with Musk’s new role as co-chair of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an initiative launched by President-elect Donald Trump.

該訴訟的結束恰逢馬斯克擔任政府效率部（DOGE）聯合主席的新職務，該部門是候任總統唐納德·川普發起的一項倡議。

This outcome highlights the complexities surrounding cryptocurrency regulation and the challenges faced by investors when alleging fraud in volatile markets like Dogecoin.

這一結果凸顯了加密貨幣監管的複雜性以及投資者在指控狗狗幣等波動市場中的詐欺行為時所面臨的挑戰。

Also Read: Dogecoin Whales Pump Coin With $56 Million Purchase, New ATH loading?

另請閱讀：狗狗幣鯨魚以 5600 萬美元購買硬幣，新的 ATH 加載？